- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newly obtained texts suggest Fauci privately worried about vaccine and miscarriage risk
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:00 am to SallysHuman
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:00 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Because pregnant women are carrying children
Kind of a qualifier of being a pregnant woman....
There was no increased risk though. So again, why did it matter?
1
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:00 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Because pregnant women are carrying children
Kind of a qualifier of being a pregnant woman....
Tbh there are some people who would disagree with this statement in 2026
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:02 am to Ingeniero
quote:
there are some people who would disagree with this statement in 2026
I realized when I wrote it that a whole new can of worms was likely opened.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 8:57 am to fightin tigers
This is a US Senator being an absolute certified moron
This is his “Guam tipping over moment”
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This is his “Guam tipping over moment”
Posted on 8/11/26 at 9:00 am to lsupride87
quote:
Yes, I think he should be jailed
What should he be jailed for in your view? You just said "all studies show there is no increase risk for pregnant women"
Posted on 8/11/26 at 9:12 am to lsupride87
It’ll never cease to amaze me the absolute dumb frick morons that we willingly and enthusiastically elect to lead us and make the most important decisions in the world on a day to day basis.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 9:48 am to idlewatcher
quote:His lab leak hiding is his biggest crime, amongst many others on how he steered politicians towards lockdowns
What should he be jailed for in your view?
quote:This is true. And?
studies show there is no increase risk for pregnant women"
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:27 am to fightin tigers
No retard...I am asking how do you have sufficient evidence that it was or was not good for pregnant women when it was not even available for a full year of case studies. It never should have been given to pregnant women without actual testing and there is no way this rat could reverse course in one month based on data after privately stating it shows signs of miscarriage to then saying its totally safe for pregnant women.
Common sense would understand this, retards not so much.
Common sense would understand this, retards not so much.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:36 am to honeybadger07
quote:
when it was not even available for a full year of case studies
How long do you think a trimester is?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:41 am to fightin tigers
3 months
What are you even getting at? The retardation is real and very strong!
But I am impressed you know the lengths of pregnancy and how to divide it up into 3rds.
Sounds like you were a bit premature, probably born late 2nd trimester.
What are you even getting at? The retardation is real and very strong!
But I am impressed you know the lengths of pregnancy and how to divide it up into 3rds.
Sounds like you were a bit premature, probably born late 2nd trimester.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:50 am to Barbellthor
quote:
It's the lying about little things that made people trust nothing, even obviously true things. He destroyed trust in our institutions.
fricking this. It’s ok the be wrong. Science is about finding out the truth through testing hypothesis and theories. What you can not do is lie, omit, or cover up things to distort what facts and real results are telling you.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:52 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I don't understand why he's not in jail worried about his death sentence appeal.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:54 am to honeybadger07
quote:
3 months
What are you even getting at? The retardation is real and very strong
Why would the study eed to be a year long when the consequence would be known in 3-5 months?
Scared the mom's will miscarriage 18 months later?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:56 am to F1y0n7h3W4LL
quote:
I don't understand why he's not in jail worried about his death sentence appeal.
He was given a preemptive pardon for crimes he may or may not have committed or might commit for up to 10 years into the future.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:56 am to F1y0n7h3W4LL
quote:
I don't understand why he's not in jail worried about his death sentence appeal.
What specific law did he break that you would charge him for?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:57 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
People lost jobs, lives, the chance to be with dying loved ones, their chance at a decent education, etc because of this man.
frick him
frick him
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:03 pm to lsupride87
quote:
We missed you here earlier Strannix where you could have once again fell for a false report
Thats rich coming from a jabpimp
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:47 pm to fightin tigers
I am stating that the shot had been available for less than a year...
Therefore, there is a limited sample size of women who have been vaccinated for him to be of the opinion in private text there could be an issue with miscarriage's and then a month later state publicly there is no issues. He obviously saw there was data to potentially support a higher rate of miscarriage's and there would not have been enough data (less than a month) to show a divergence in that trend in that short amount of time.
How someone takes my initial statement and takes it as I dont understand how long a pregnancy last is pretty special person.
Honestly , its crazy this has to be explained. But I get it, some people are mentally challenged and lack the ability to read and comprehend.
Appears we found one of those people.
Therefore, there is a limited sample size of women who have been vaccinated for him to be of the opinion in private text there could be an issue with miscarriage's and then a month later state publicly there is no issues. He obviously saw there was data to potentially support a higher rate of miscarriage's and there would not have been enough data (less than a month) to show a divergence in that trend in that short amount of time.
How someone takes my initial statement and takes it as I dont understand how long a pregnancy last is pretty special person.
Honestly , its crazy this has to be explained. But I get it, some people are mentally challenged and lack the ability to read and comprehend.
Appears we found one of those people.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:57 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
here is a limited sample size of women
There it is.
So what was the sample size, because time doesn't really matter in all this? The vaccine existed for a year before it ever was used for the general public. So you got that part wrong.
Also, knowing what causes miscarriages is a huge piece of this. Nothing the vaccine did was attributed to causing miscarriages.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:02 pm to honeybadger07
quote:
for him to be of the opinion in private text there could be an issue with miscarriage's and then a month later state publicly there is no issues.
What do you think happened during that timeframe?
When were COVID vaccines actually recommended to pregnant women in the United States?
Page 6 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News