Started By
Message

re: New Toyota Tundras only have V6 engines now? Tacomas only have 4 cyclinders?

Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:25 am to
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144463 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

magnetic grey
I call it confederate grey
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
33906 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Debatable. The truck is heavy and if put under stress, the durability of this particular motor likely will not endure the test of time. The 5.7 was/is bulletproof. Why didn’t they introduce a diesel like the rest of the pla


That’s a different conversation and I’m sure you’re correct that the turbo will not last as long as the naturally aspirated v8.

The issue I was referring to was metal shavings being left in the cylinders causing catastrophic engine failure. Toyota has issued a safety recall and is replacing about 100,000 engines for Tundras built between 21 and 22. It’s a safety recall so it doesn’t expire which means you could drive your affected tundra for 200k miles and 10 years without issue and then go have a new engine put in and drive it another 10 years with the replaced engine.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25947 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:44 am to
quote:

The issue I was referring to was metal shavings being left in the cylinders causing catastrophic engine failure. Toyota has issued a safety recall and is replacing about 100,000 engines for Tundras built between 21 and 22.


There are a lot of reports of 2023 and 2024 models with engine failure BTW.

I think Toyota still uses the same old buzzy 2.5L 4 cylinder hybrid for the Camry, Lexus ES hybrid, and the new Crown. Those are likely still very "Toyota-like" in terms of reliability. I'd buy them if I needed a vehicle like that. The Crown Insignia in particular is a legitimately good vehicle with no real direct competitors too.

But I don't think I'd get the new Toyota turbo motors unless I happened to live very close to a dealership that can service it and got an extended warranty. That's especially the case with anything that uses the 3.4L twin turbo because they have a horrible reputation and are designed in a way that makes them more difficult to service than the other turbocharged Toyota motors.

I'm 20 minutes from the Toyota dealer, which isn't a problem for my 2021 4Runner because it's very old school and is very unlikely to break. But my location probably means that the next car I get won't be a Toyota...unless they figure how to return to what made them Toyota in the first place. I'm 5 minutes from a GMC and a Ford dealer - both of which are farther along in dealing with their "compliance" related design issues and both can be serviced very close to home.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 9:51 am
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
33906 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

There are a lot of reports of 2023 and 2024 models with engine failure BTW.


They may be included in the recall as well. I might be mistaken that it was only 21-22.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25947 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

They may be included in the recall as well. I might be mistaken that it was only 21-22.



Not sure of the details of the recall, but it's a big pain point that not all trucks with engine failures are subject to the recall. The recalled ones get a new engine (basically a factory Toyota engine with turbos and everything already on there). The dealers swap out the motors pretty quickly and all is good. The owners get a brand new engine built to factory specs and are really only out of a truck for a day or two. Toyota's reputation is tarnished but likely not broken in the eyes of the owners whose trucks were recalled - especially if the new engine never has a failure.

The ones that fail but are were NOT subject to the recall (there are many of them) get a short block and the Toyota dealerships have to reinstall all the old parts around it - and they may or may not be very experienced in doing that kind of work very well or very quickly. These are the ones that clog up the Toyota service bays for days or even weeks at a time. These are also the ones that turn up again later with leaky gaskets and other flaws that were created when a tech made a mistake in the rebuild. These are also probably the cases most likely to result in a furious truck owner that leaves the brand forever.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
33906 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:03 am to
quote:

The ones that fail but are were NOT subject to the recall (there are many of them) get a short block and the Toyota dealerships have to reinstall all the old parts around it - and they may or may not be very experienced in doing that kind of work very well or very quickly. These are the ones that clog up the Toyota service bays for days or even weeks at a time. These are also the ones that turn up again later with leaky gaskets and other flaws that were created when a tech made a mistake in the rebuild. These are also probably the cases most likely to result in a furious truck owner that leaves the brand forever.


Yeah that’s bullshite! And I would be outraged. Odd that Toyota would be taking care of some issues but fricking people on others.


Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25947 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I doubt you would want to pay me what I want for it. It's a 21 4x4 crewcab limited, magnetic grey with nightshade. Just passed 16K miles.



Nice! That's very low mileage too. My 2021 4Runner TRD Off Road Premium is Magnetic Grey. Mine has 42,000 miles though because of a few cross country trips. I've already flushed the transmission because we used it for towing quite a bit. I'm probably going to have to get new tires within the next year for it too.

If I get a new Tundra (years and years from now at this rate), I'll probably get white or grey. The 1794 ones look very nice. It's too bad the new ones are just a huge fumble on Toyota's part. Maybe they'll redesign it next year.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
14520 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Lamborghini killed the V10, switched to V8s


Get it while you can.
Lambo Dallas
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
16792 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:37 am to
quote:

A 21 Land Cruiser with 60k miles is going for more than those new V4 land cruisers.


And 21 Tundras that don’t have 200k miles are hard to come by too.
Posted by White Bear
Yonnygo
Member since Jul 2014
16300 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:39 am to
Who thought turbos would save us from climate oblivion.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
130116 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Not sure of the details of the recall, but it's a big pain point that not all trucks with engine failures are subject to the recall.


That recall has to get expanded. 24's are having that issue as well, and they didn't recall the ones with the hybrid engine, which I think is only because they still have motive power if the engine barfs. I expect there will be more, but at least they are reacting to it.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
130116 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Nice! That's very low mileage too.


I work from home, so there are some weeks it never leaves the garage, but I love driving it.
quote:

Maybe they'll redesign it next year.

This is Toyota, so this design is likely to be around for 6-8 more years before a complete redesign. A refresh probably next year, but then again, because of these issues, they might try to speed up a redesign to put this version behind them sooner.

They should have offered the V8 as an option.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
80092 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 11:48 am to
I have a 2016 Tundra that is tight and rattle free as the day I bought it. 143k miles and no issues except from catalytic converter thieves.

Every few months I get the urge to go truck shopping. I like the Raptors and the new Ram RHO looks awesome. But does anyone have real faith that these new trucks with their technology will last 10 years without hassle? I’m sure some will, but for these prices, I want to be confident my truck won’t be having problems. Having a trouble-free vehicle is one of those things in life you take for granted if you have one.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
130116 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 11:52 am to
quote:

But does anyone have real faith that these new trucks with their technology will last 10 years without hassle?


No

But I have learned, and truck companies have figured out that people want bells and whistles and reliability is not a concern. They also learned they can add a feature that costs them $100 and sell it for $4000, so that is why all you see on lots now are $60K+ trucks.
Posted by DerkaDerka
Member since Jul 2016
1184 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Truck bros are the new ricers. Quit bothering everyone with your shitty exhausts.


Them and harleys. What once was cool is now lame and gay.
Posted by TigerRoyale
Zwolle
Member since Oct 2023
676 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 12:34 pm to
Long term durability is the question. You're absolutely correct.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
60737 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 12:48 pm to
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
2412 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

That's especially the case with anything that uses the 3.4L twin turbo because they have a horrible reputation


This is so misinformed. The 3.4L twin turbo has been around since 2017 and has been used since then on Lexus’s flagship LS500 with no problems. Aa mentioned earlier in this thread, the Tundra had machining debris issues from a specific line.
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10299 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

This generation has ruined cars.


The Federal Government has ruined cars with the excessive safety/emissions regulations.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that the automakers supported it, though, since it gives them a steady stream of buyers---they aren't going to last nearly as long as they used to.

Y'all see the other day that they're going to require seatbelt detectors in the back seats now? You know that's not free, right? Just two (or 3?) more sensors piled upon probably a hundred others that you now have to pay for. And we struggle to undertstand how cars got so expensive.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 1:44 pm
Posted by JEC119
Member since Apr 2024
1218 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 2:18 pm to
I once had a 1978 F-150 Ranger Explore (Said all that on the truck)

This thread is reminding what a Dumbass I was to get rid of it.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram