Started By
Message

re: New 2027 Silverado possibly leaked via patent drawings

Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by Ping Pong
LSU and UVA alum
Member since Aug 2014
6250 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Did they fix the shitty engines and shittier transmissions?


Its still made by GM, so that would no
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8864 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:14 pm to
what year truck?
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
102681 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:17 pm to
I like it
Posted by poppa1254
Moody, AL
Member since Jan 2019
580 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

what year truck


2018 5.3
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 12:46 pm
Posted by Nome tiger
Member since Nov 2014
188 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 2:15 pm to
I’ve had 10 different new GM trucks since 2005. I put 70k-120k miles on each of them. 5-5.3’s, 3-6.0’s, 1-3.0dm and 1-6.6dm

I may be the luckiest guy on earth but over the past 21 years I’ve had 2 of them in the shop for repairs other than recall work. The 07 1/2 ton need front wheel bearings replaced at 40k and the 22 3.0 had the oil pan replaced twice due to leaks. All the GM hate on here surprises me. (Except for the seat complaints, I’d love to jam a hot fire poker up the arse of whomever designed the 07-13 seats)
Posted by carhartt
Member since Feb 2013
8350 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 2:20 pm to
Work trim starting at a low $55,600!
Posted by 3deadtrolls
lafayette
Member since Jan 2014
6904 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

replacing the 5.3 is a huge mistake


Replacing the LS 5.3 was a huge mistake. Replacing the DFM 5.3 mess we have now is fine.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2939 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

3deadtrolls


Underrated username
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
139399 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:27 pm to
Looks good, won't last
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
15271 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:27 pm to
Not buying any Government Motors shite. Should’ve been allowed to go bankrupt 17 years ago. But no - we got to prop up the boomer union members pension plans among other bullshite business decisions.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12677 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

The keep getting boxier and boxier


Next thing you know they are going to dust off this design.

Posted by HarryBalzack
Member since Oct 2012
16357 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 4:59 pm to
Still hecho'd in Mexico?
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84704 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

And when it comes to turbo motors….long term an inline design with a single turbo just has fewer failure points.


Ram has an inline 6 turbo engine that sounds pretty cool
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
16266 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Hopefully they fix the damn uncomfortable seats. I had a 23 Silverado for a year and that seat destroyed my back.


I’ve had 2018, 2021, and 2025 LTZ’s, I put ~50k miles a year on it, and I find the seats plenty comfortable.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Still hecho'd in Mexico?



3 plants make the Silverado and Sierra. They are located in Michigan, Indiana, and Mexico.

I think they are expanding the Flint, MI plant to skirt tariffs.

The 90 year old Tonawanda, New York plant will be handling most of the gasoline engine production. Interesting thing about this is that they are handling the crankshaft with cracked caps of the new engines. Currently they do this for the 5.3L V8s but the crank and bearings of the 6.2L were are shipped in from Mexico. I suspect this move is because of quality problems from Mexico, but I wonder if the new 5.7L V8 engine they are building starting next year will have a cast iron crankshaft and not a forged steel crank.

The 2.7L Turbo will continue production in Indiana, so that's definitely going to remain an engine option for the new full sized GM trucks. Some folks think this could be paired with a hybrid electric motor.

Flint Engine Operations is still going to be producing the 3.0L 6 cylinder turbodiesel well into 2030 (union contracts tell that story), so that's going to be an engine option on at least some of the new full sized trucks too. This one is a favorite of mine. Hopefully the next generation Suburban and Yukon keep this motor as an option.

Supposedly the 6.6L gas V8 and 6.6L turbodiesel will remain for the HDs, but a 6.6L next gen V8 will be used for the Corvette eventually. So they will have a pair of 6.6L V8 engines that are actually not related to each other in design - one for performance cars, one for heavier trucks.

Hard to figure out their transmission plans because so many different plants crank them out. But I'm guessing the trucks will get the next gen 10 speed, with the already new 8 speed carrying over from 2023+ model year base/entry level trucks.
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 7:37 pm
Posted by Mstate
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2009
10540 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

isnt there a plug and play way to get rid of that?


There are the range AFM disabler that you just plug in to the truck but I’ve read that to fully fix the issue you need to actually take the engine out and remove the lifters.
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
17445 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:37 pm to
All they change is the grill and taillights.

All trucks look the same.

Except the Cybertruck which is very ugly. .
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
55975 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

I dk why they’d put the 6.6 in a half ton.


Because they know I'll buy it
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

It would definitely help the reliability


True, but the updated oil pump in the L84 has resolved a lot of the lifter issues people have complained about.

The sightly older L83 (and even the current 6.2L L87 motor) use a variable displacement pump. I'm convinced the issues with lifters is actually caused by oil starvation, and not a defect with the actual lifter itself. The lifter fails from inadequate oiling, and that seems to have been mostly resolved in the newer models with the static rate oil pumps (that also probably cause a little more fuel consumption).

quote:

but I’ve always found the 5.3 lacking in off idle/low rpm power.


They used to rip....then GM started putting in 3.08 and 3.23 Axle Ratios to save fuel. The trucks have also gotten much bigger/heavier as well. They seem to still have plenty of power if you can get one with 3.73 gears, but they are hard to find - they might not even make those anymore.

quote:

Bumping it to 5.7 or 6.6 would definitely help.
The 5.3 makes great power at an rpm range I rarely drive at.


I hope they keep the torque curve and that responsiveness. Just ramp up the output by about 15-20%.

I remember it was controversial when it came out, because the old 350 and 305ci V8s from the 1990s offered most of their torque at a lower, more accessible RPM.....but they also felt wheezy AF on the highway. People love those motors because they were powerful for their day. They became boat anchors the second the LM7 came out.

I'm honestly a huge fan of the L84 5.3L V8 in current full sized GM trucks. That's probably my favorite half ton engine right now. And I love that we could get one in the 2027+ trucks too and they aren't moving exclusively to small displacement turbos. I'm a fan of the responsiveness and the sound of those trucks. And the highest risk issue with them seems to be lifters.....which is cheap and fairly easy compared to replacing turbos (which requires a cab-off operation on the Tundra and some ecoboost Fords).

I also love the Ram's HEMI and the earlier Ford Coyotes (before they used the wet oil pump belt). But if I absolutely had to get a turbo motor, it would probably be the Ford 3.5 and Chevrolet/GMC 2.7. I would run away from the Toyota Tundra with the twin turbo 3.4L V6. Don't know much about the Ram Hurricane, but it looks pretty good.
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 7:53 pm
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
2939 posts
Posted on 12/19/25 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

There are the range AFM disabler that you just plug in to the truck


The new ones require install underneath the driver’s side wheel well liner.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram