- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Need AA Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Opinion
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:40 pm to slacker130
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:40 pm to slacker130
No doubt. Let the loons self-identify
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:41 pm to bdavids09
quote:
How in the hell does that not raise any red flags
The same as American assets in Japan telling the US intelligence apparatus, circa Nov 1941, that the entire Japanese fleet has put to sea and nobody knows where they are going.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:42 pm to Cajunhawk81
quote:This is what happened according to you "just cause"
They saw a cruise missle. It didn't hit the ground, it didn't skid. It didn't cartwheel.
No other reason, "just cause"
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:44 pm to Sao
That's the one I referenced. You can only see 150 feet or so out of the lawn.
Face it, if a "straight-ahead birds eye view" pic existed that shows what you claim it shows, you'd lead with that pic, and focus solely on that pic, as it would be irrefutable evidence.
But such a pic doesn't exist so you don't.
Face it, if a "straight-ahead birds eye view" pic existed that shows what you claim it shows, you'd lead with that pic, and focus solely on that pic, as it would be irrefutable evidence.
But such a pic doesn't exist so you don't.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:44 pm to Cajunhawk81
quote:Explain what happened to Flight 77 and its passengers.
You mean those up close staged pictures? Come on man. Do better.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:45 pm to Sao
I just don’t see evidence of a massive amount of aviation fuel having burned up in that hole. The sides of the hole in numerous pics like this one just don’t resemble anything close to the same aviation fuel explosion/fire that caused the twin towers to eventually collapse. Based on what we saw of the twin towers impacts/explosions, there should’ve been one hell of a larger explosion here upon impact & then a significant burn thereafter. It just doesn’t look right imo & for the record I don’t care about any of the inside job, etc. theories. The truth is all I’m interested in. The 2 towers & this just never looked anywhere near similar. Not to mention that D.C. was & is one of the most surveilled cities in the world. Surely we could put this this entire conversation to rest by presenting more video from that day from other cameras around the city…..? I don’t want to hear from “witnesses”. Just show me original footage from around D.C. that day or else explain to me how NY has 100’s+ videos of the 2 planes hitting the towers from that day yet there’s only 1 video from D.C.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:47 pm to PCRammer
quote:
Also all of the people who were sitting in DC traffic literally a tenth mile away on the freeway as the plane flew right above them.
Arlington* traffic.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:48 pm to GCTiger11
quote:Cajunhawk, what are your thoughts on this?
There are a dozen pictures easily accessible online from the Moussaoui trial that show plane debris, human remains, and charred bodies still in their seats
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:51 pm to SBGRosco
quote:Interesting. What are your credentials regarding fire forensics?
I just don’t see evidence of a massive amount of aviation fuel having burned up in that hole.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:52 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
I just don’t see evidence of a massive amount of aviation fuel having burned up in that hole.
Does it look like a Tomahawk hit it?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:55 pm to bdavids09
quote:
Yeah if I recall they asked the flight school to learn how to fly but not takeoff or land. How in the hell does that not raise any red flags especially when its young men of middle eastern descent?
I'm not sure if that was ever confirmed. But obviously Moussaoui was reported to the FBI, and the FBI was made aware of a suspiciously large number of middle eastern flight students prior to 9/11 I think.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 3:56 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
I just don’t see evidence of a massive amount of aviation fuel having burned up in that hole. The sides of the hole in numerous pics like this one just don’t resemble anything close to the same aviation fuel explosion/fire that caused the twin towers to eventually collapse. Based on what we saw of the twin towers impacts/explosions, there should’ve been one hell of a larger explosion here upon impact & then a significant burn thereafter. It just doesn’t look right imo & for the record I don’t care about any of the inside job, etc. theories. The truth is all I’m interested in. The 2 towers & this just never looked anywhere near similar. Not to mention that D.C. was & is one of the most surveilled cities in the world. Surely we could put this this entire conversation to rest by presenting more video from that day from other cameras around the city…..? I don’t want to hear from “witnesses”. Just show me original footage from around D.C. that day or else explain to me how NY has 100’s+ videos of the 2 planes hitting the towers from that day yet there’s only 1 video from D.C.
yes, yes. sure sure sure.
so what happened to flight 77?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:02 pm to SBGRosco
quote:Easy. Only 2 videos exist of the first plane hitting the north tower. 1 was because a French film crew happened to be filming a documentary on NYC firefighters and happened to capture the footage while luckily filming in the street with a view of the tower. The other video is someone filming while riding in a car and accidentally captured the impact. No other video exists. No surveillance. Nothing. In the most populated city in America. In 2001 nobody had cell phone cameras. And nobody anticipated the attack on the first tower just like nobody anticipated the pentagon would be hit. We have so many videos of the 2nd plane hitting the 2nd tower bc news stations and journalists were already filming the 1st tower on fire.
Just show me original footage from around D.C. that day or else explain to me how NY has 100’s+ videos of the 2 planes hitting the towers from that day yet there’s only 1 video from D.C.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:05 pm to spiderman
the conspiracy theorists seem to have piped down.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:06 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
the conspiracy theorists seem to have piped down.
an American Airlines B-757 hit the Pentagon as flight 77 on 9/11/2001
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:08 pm to SBGRosco
quote:Since you're 'just asking questions', I have one for you. If two different buildings, differing significantly in both design and material, were set on fire, should we expect the fire to behave exactly the same?
The 2 towers & this just never looked anywhere near similar.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:15 pm to broadhead
why are you linking that in response to my post
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:36 pm to northshorebamaman
I’m just Average Joe with a bit of critical thinking. The impact explosions at the 2 towers & the same @ the Pentagon look dramatically different based on all of the footage I’ve ever seen. Do I really have to be credentialed somehow to notice something that seems so obvious to the commoner?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 4:39 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
The impact explosions at the 2 towers & the same @ the Pentagon look dramatically different based on all of the footage I’ve ever seen.
Really?
Because the only explosion impact footage we have of the pentagon looks pretty damn similar to the WTC impact explosions.
What videos are you watching?
Popular
Back to top



0






