- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Need AA Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Opinion
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:20 pm to SBGRosco
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:20 pm to SBGRosco
quote:A lot do dive into here but first I want to make sure I'm understanding your questions correctly. As far as daily reports of discovering bodies and body parts, are you asking why it took longer to recover bodies from the rubble of the WTC wreckage than the Pentagon?
Why BBC weren’t there daily reports of finding more debris and body parts at the Pentagon as there were for Manhattan? Why was there so much more intact & unburned debris in the hole at the Pentagon than @ the twin towers?
As to your second question, are you asking why the debris in the Pentagon was relatively "intact" compared to that found in the rubble of two massive towers that collapsed and burned for days?
Honestly asking because I don't want to misrepresent your questions.
0
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:21 pm to Tyga Woods
quote:
I don’t have that rating, cap’n
back to Walmarks then!
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:35 pm to Cajunhawk81
"..It was a cruise missile, "
Cruise missiles require a large military platform to launch from: plane, sub or ship. Are you saying there was a contingent of military personnel who launched this against the Pentagon? Boy, those guys can forget anything about a promotion.
Cruise missiles require a large military platform to launch from: plane, sub or ship. Are you saying there was a contingent of military personnel who launched this against the Pentagon? Boy, those guys can forget anything about a promotion.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:35 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
then an explosion that doesn’t come close to resembling the impact/explosions of the twin towers
Explain. They look pretty similar. How are they different in appearance in your opinion?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:46 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
It doesn’t look like a commercial jet hit it imo.
So let me get this straight:
1. The gubment planned a multi-target attack on the US as a false flag
2. The gumbent took control of two planes out of Logan and crashed them into the towers
3. They took control of a flight out of Newark and lost control of the operation and it crashed in a field
4. They took control of a plane out of Dulles and disappeared it in order to fly a Tomahawk into the Pentagon and pretend it was AA 77.
5. They disappeared a 757 and the 64 on board to cover the use of a Tomahawk
6. They found and silenced what would have been thousands of people who noticed a sub-sonic cruise missile flying into DC.
7. They have kept the hundreds of people who would have to have been in on the operation quiet for over 20 years.
Say I believe all this, what would be the point in not using AA 77 and replacing it with a cruise missile? Further complicating the mission by having to disappear the plane. Further setting up a situation that would be unexplainable if the cruise missile failed in some way.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:51 pm to Obtuse1
I don’t care about any of that. Just show me real footage of a plane hitting the building. It’s gotta be available from somewhere.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:56 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
I don’t care about any of that. Just show me real footage of a plane hitting the building. It’s gotta be available from somewhere.
So if that footage doesn't exist, thats proof to you that all of it is a conspiracy and it was a cruise missile? And all of those very valid counterpoints that Obtuse posted are irrelevant? Your entire theory hinges SOLELY on there not being good video evidence?
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 5:59 pm
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:56 pm to northshorebamaman
Fed! ??
Posted on 9/6/23 at 5:59 pm to SBGRosco
Huh? I'm a fed because I don't consider your posts or observations to be proof of anything? 
Posted on 9/6/23 at 6:15 pm to Obtuse1
Yeah bruh. Duh.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:13 pm to Tyga Woods
I know someone that was on the ground at the Pentagon the following day. He has choice words for the conspiracy idiots.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:26 pm to SBGRosco
quote:Do you think we landed on the moon? Just asking because I'm curious given we had no wifi for the Nest cams back in the day.
Just show me real footage of a plane hitting the building. It’s gotta be available from somewhere.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:32 pm to Sayre
quote:
He has choice words for the conspiracy idiots.
I imagine it comes across as disrespectful to families of the victims.
This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 8:09 pm
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:34 pm to SBGRosco
quote:You can start with this thread.
Where do I find the original images of plane debris
quote:I did.
Why couldn’t I find them back then
quote:Completely different types of structures, perhaps?
Why was there so much more intact & unburned debris in the hole at the Pentagon than @ the twin towers?
quote:So what put the big hole in the building? Even if it were me missile, wouldn't this question still be valid? So I don't follow what point you think this is making.
As a matter of fact, my most vivid account of that day was a news coverage only hours after the impact that they showed the “hole” & there was a clean desk with a book full of clean white pages flipping back n forth from the wind or helicopters
quote:You don't see a difference between one fire with no attempts to contain and another with attempts to contain? Nope, nothing?
How could that have been if it’d burned for hours as did the twin towers
quote:So you asked a question, literal experts have explained this but because it doesn't fit your narrative, you now know better than the experts, is that your assertion?
I’m calling total bs on that one
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:35 pm to Tyga Woods
quote:I can't really understand why one would think 2 different types of structures should react exactly the same.
The pentagon was reinforced concrete. Like the poster above stated, it’s going to absorb impact differently than structural steel that is spaced apart.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:38 pm to Sao
A number of my friends at Army Navy Country Club (Arlington Campus) who are retired flag officers and pilots who flew in combat, saw AA flight 77 fly over our driving range at a very low altitude (I heard 250 feet). That aircraft is what hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
If it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, would someone let former Solicitor General, Ted Olsen, know that his wife, Barbara (who was in communication with General Olsen before the crash), is still alive?
If it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, would someone let former Solicitor General, Ted Olsen, know that his wife, Barbara (who was in communication with General Olsen before the crash), is still alive?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:39 pm to SBGRosco
quote:It's been explained in about 5 different posts, and you've ignored every single one and keep asking the same question.
I don’t care about any of that. Just show me real footage of a plane hitting the building. It’s gotta be available from somewhere.
You think there are dozens of videos of the 1st plane hitting the tower. You can start there with being incorrect and work off of that. Or you can ignore it and keep repeating the same thing.
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:42 pm to SBGRosco
quote:
I don’t care about any of that. Just show me real footage of a plane hitting the building. It’s gotta be available from somewhere.
Go find real footage of a random exterior wall on the Pentagon from 9-10-01. Should be everywhere right?
Posted on 9/6/23 at 7:46 pm to broadhead
My wife lived right across the interstate from the Pentagon and heard the plane hit the Pentagon. The plane’s engines were on the lawn of the Pentagon. The pilot of the plane was the most experienced of the pilots and had more than just flight simulator hours. The 9/11 Truther guys are hilarious
Posted on 9/6/23 at 8:02 pm to Sao
It’s not that hard to crash a plane.
Page 9 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News