re: Need AA Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Opinion

quote:

---

Plus it's listed on the FBI's website as a photo of the exterior.

---

There is an exterior on both sides of each ring



Eta in reference to the no parking sign…the pentagon is huge. They have delivery vehicles that operate inside the rings.

quote:

---

He said it was an actual aircraft full of people. He described a bit of what he saw and I was convinced..

---

There are a dozen pictures easily accessible online from the Moussaoui trial that show plane debris, human remains, and charred bodies still in their seats. Some of the most sobering photos I’ve seen on the internet.

quote:

---

More half assed eye witnesses. They all don't know what they saw...and conflict other statements repeatedly. They saw a cruise missle. It didn't hit the ground, it didn't skid. It didn't cartwheel. It punched a perfect hole in the walls...before the floors collapsed...conveniently.

---

Yes, the hundreds of witnesses that said they watched an airplane fly over the highway and into the building are all lying or stupid and don't know what a commercial airliner looks like. We should believe a nut like you and not the actual eyewitness. Do you dispute that 2 airplanes crashed into the WTC? I bet you don't, b/c their is video evidence. If you believe they did then how is it inconceivable that a 3rd plane hit the pentagon, just as the eyewitnesses said? I guess you also believe someone then went around spreading American Airline parts all over the Pentagon lawn after the "cruise missle" struck. You are a moron.

quote:

---

All conflicting information, and half assed eye witness accounts

---

Boy, you moved those goalposts real quick.

You claimed there were no reports from eyewitnesses stating they saw a plane. Then when exactly that was provided, you didn't concede you were wrong, which you were. You simply shifted the goalposts.

The above is bad enough, but your excuse for being basically that those people don't know what they saw and YOU know what they saw is just not very good. You gotta do better than that.

quote:

---

The conflicting information is huge. Most state the plane clipped the ground. Yet the lawn was good enough for golf. How can that be?

---

You realize in basically every single big catastrophe type issue there are ALWAYS conflicting reports, right? Any time there's a mass shooter, for example, there are always all kinds of contradicting repots like hearing multiple shooters, etc. These are things you don't see every day, you think you see something in some exact way but it may be slightly off. Like whether the plane touched the grass or not, different people from different angles may see it differently. But if a bunch of people say they saw a plane, the overarching point is they probably saw a plane, unless you can provide an actual reason that it was not a plane, you saying, "they're wrong and didn't see a plane" does nothing to further your point.

quote:

---

A friend of mine helped clean that up. It absolutely wasn’t a missile He said it was an actual aircraft full of people. He described a bit of what he saw and I was convinced..

---

Your “friend” is obviously in on it.

his “friend” was probably a hologram created by dick cheney and Halliburton

quote:

---

You claimed there were no reports from eyewitnesses stating they saw a plane. Then when exactly that was provided, you didn't concede you were wrong, which you were. You simply shifted the goalposts.

The above is bad enough, but your excuse for being basically that those people don't know what they saw and YOU know what they saw is just not very good. You gotta do better than that.

---

All of this. Sao, does it ever give you pause that your fellow travelers in these threads are obvious idiots?

quote:

---

Working assessments with people who have severe schizophrenia was the exact same way. They would claim the cia bugged the light bulb. When you tried to show them it wasn’t bugged it just became more evidence of the greater conspiracy.

---

quote:

---

I miss those days so that’s why I read the poli board.

---

That's the inside wall of the outer ring building. look at the direction the debris is going. That isn't the wall that received the direct impact.

It's been a long time but I remember watching Barbara Olson on Fox News. She wasn't the kind of person who would agree to disappear and live off the grid the rest of her life to conceal a conspiracy that involved killing innocent people.

Only 3 of the 4 planes hit the intended targets and there may have been a fifth plane to be hijacked but wasn't that day. To act as if the events of the day were too perfectly orchestrated to have been accomplished by the highjackers themselves is contradicted by reality.