Started By
Message

re: Need AA Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Opinion

Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Flight 93 was shot down. 100% It got off course. There is no reason to think we didn't have the capability to shoot that plane down for as long as it was hanging in the breeze. I will always believe that plane was meant for the Pentagon, and 77 was the closest grounded plane to the Pentagon and took it's place. Cruise missile did the deed to put the nail in the coffin.

I think the towers fell on their own. I played with the SUPER THERMITE (Jesse Ventura voice) conspiracies and I think those are interesting, but highly unlikely. Tower 7...they blew that building up to destroy things they've been wanting to go away for years

Jesus Christ.
Posted by SM6
Georgia
Member since Jul 2008
8958 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

SteelerBravesDawg


Meh. Delta employee or spouse?
Posted by SM6
Georgia
Member since Jul 2008
8958 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

what happens if the computer doesn’t do what it’s supposed to?


It’s a fair point, but today I trust the computer more than the pilot. Look at the Colgan crash, which is why we are in a pilot shortage today.

Poorly trained pilots will continue to make mistakes, and arbitrarily requiring 1,500 hours for an ATP to fly Part 121 won’t make for better pilots. What is leading to safer outcomes is better technology on aircraft to prevent bad human decisions, and to a lesser extent improved fatigue/pilot rest rules.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42548 posts
Posted on 9/7/23 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

Wait. You think Pearl Harbor was fa


Hell no, but some (not me) believe the government let Japan attack so we could declare war.
Posted by Buck Wylde
Member since Jun 2019
480 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 8:44 am to
quote:

quote:
It was a missile.


quote:
traveling over 550 mph and nearly dead horizontal with only 30' of altitude at impact


Better chance of a commercial airliner doing this than a missile in the AO we're talking about.




Maybe with an experienced pilot flying but not some Hadji. How did airliner miss all the trees, light poles, etc? I'd believe it if it just kamakazi'd into the roof, which is what most people would have done. Too sketchy for me to believe it was an airliner.
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
64514 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 10:28 am to
So I'm this inside job scenario they hit the towers with real planes but chose to do something else for the Pentagon and whatever happened in Pennsylvania? Why would they do that? If they had the ability to use planes for the towers why do something different for the pentagon? Wouldn't that draw suspicion? I'm pretty untrusting of the gubmint but the idea that it was anything but a plane just isn't very logical
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 10:42 am to
quote:

If they had the ability to use planes for the towers
Did they?

How does a paper passport get found in pristine condition coming out of an explosion that brought down an entire skyscraper?

Lies, lies, and more lies.
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
64514 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 1:31 pm to
I mean we clearly saw planes on video hit the towers in multiple different videos, sources, and angles. Obviously a lot more for the second than the first

I'm not even getting into whether there were also explosives inside the tower that helped bring them down or whatever else I'm just saying it's fairly indisputable literal planes hit those towers unless you really want to dive off into batshit crazy land
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
64514 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

So let me get this straight: 1. The gubment planned a multi-target attack on the US as a false flag 2. The gumbent took control of two planes out of Logan and crashed them into the towers 3. They took control of a flight out of Newark and lost control of the operation and it crashed in a field 4. They took control of a plane out of Dulles and disappeared it in order to fly a Tomahawk into the Pentagon and pretend it was AA 77. 5. They disappeared a 757 and the 64 on board to cover the use of a Tomahawk 6. They found and silenced what would have been thousands of people who noticed a sub-sonic cruise missile flying into DC. 7. They have kept the hundreds of people who would have to have been in on the operation quiet for over 20 years. Say I believe all this, what would be the point in not using AA 77 and replacing it with a cruise missile? Further complicating the mission by having to disappear the plane. Further setting up a situation that would be unexplainable if the cruise missile failed in some way.


Basically, all of this
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

I mean we clearly saw planes on video
Yes, we did. Who shot the videos? Where were they produced? Why is the sky so dark and hazy in the videos when in fact it was a bright and clear day?
Why does the nose of the plane go through the building and come out in tact on the other side?

You'll just have to pardon me for being skeptical towards a media and government that lies to me 24/7, 365.

ETA: Besides that, the people I've talked to and video I've seen of people who were there that day, tell me a very different story than the story we've been told to believe.
This post was edited on 9/8/23 at 2:44 pm
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
64514 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Sorry. Yes, I think 77, 11, 93 and 175 all crashed exactly where they did. 77 as well but I'm a little confused how the exact data the FAA and Commission state as fact can be true. I don't believe 77 was traveling at over 530 mph while completing the loop and fast decent, though. Still reading but it's just my opinion so far.


So if the government story is basically correct then why lie about the speed/loop/etc? Or are you saying they are just wrong due to error?
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
64514 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Yes, we did. Who shot the videos? Where were they produced? Why is the sky so dark and hazy in the videos when in fact it was a bright and clear day? Why does the nose of the plane go through the building and come out in tact on the other side? You'll just have to pardon me for being skeptical towards a media and government that lies to me 24/7, 365. ETA: Besides that, the people I've talked to and video I've seen of people who were there that day, tell me a very different story than the story we've been told to believe.


Ok so batshit crazy land, got it
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39349 posts
Posted on 9/8/23 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Yes, we did. Who shot the videos? Where were they produced? Why is the sky so dark and hazy in the videos when in fact it was a bright and clear day? Why does the nose of the plane go through the building and come out in tact on the other side? You'll just have to pardon me for being skeptical towards a media and government that lies to me 24/7, 365. ETA: Besides that, the people I've talked to and video I've seen of people who were there that day, tell me a very different story than the story we've been told to believe.



Ok so batshit crazy land, got it


That seems to be where we are in society. We just got through being locked up in our own homes. We had an "election" that clearly was not on the up-and-up.

Fabricating video of a horrific event like 9/11 for the purpose of whipping up patriotism and sending our best and bravest halfway around the globe for the next 20 years to save our monetary system, just seems par for the course.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41016 posts
Posted on 9/11/23 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Yes, we did. Who shot the videos? Where were they produced? Why is the sky so dark and hazy in the videos when in fact it was a bright and clear day?
Why does the nose of the plane go through the building and come out in tact on the other side?

You'll just have to pardon me for being skeptical towards a media and government that lies to me 24/7, 365.

ETA: Besides that, the people I've talked to and video I've seen of people who were there that day, tell me a very different story than the story we've been told to believe.


Wait we really have people out there that don't believe two planes hit the World Trade Center?


man that's wild.
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 20Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram