- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mugger killed by victim in BR altercation
Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:58 am to SamuelClemens
Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:58 am to SamuelClemens
quote:
Without clicking the link, did he shoot at them in the back as they ran off after robbing him? ETA: or trying to rob him? If the robber was shot in the back while running away, the victim may get charged.
unpopular opinion here i'm sure but if you shoot someone in the back who poses you no (current) threat then you probably should be charged
different if you're actively defending yourself imo
Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:59 am to BowDownToLSU
He's a good boy, he was just on his way to night classes at BRCC.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:02 am to BowDownToLSU
Baton Rouge is just a little bit better this morning. 
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:02 am to HMTVBrian2
quote:
different if you're actively defending yourself imo
Well, here's a thought: Don't rob someone if you don't want to get shot. Pulling a gun on someone threatening their life then "changing your mind" does not give you a free pass to move on to your next victim.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:09 am to BowDownToLSU
Shame. Boy had just got accepted to med school.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:10 am to BowDownToLSU
Give that man a medal.
Saved us all some tax dollars and made the streets safer.
Need to have a bounty system.
Saved us all some tax dollars and made the streets safer.
Need to have a bounty system.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:14 am to HMTVBrian2
quote:
unpopular opinion here i'm sure but if you shoot someone in the back who poses you no (current) threat then you probably should be charged
Just because someone has their back to you doesn't make them no threat. They can be moving to cover to fire at you or going for re-enforcements. Plus it all happens so fast. Someone approaches you with a gun, you pull yours to fire at them, they see the gun and spin around, you start to fire.. that can all happen in about a second. Its still self defense..
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:14 am to HMTVBrian2
Easy for you to Monday morning QB the situation. Now imagine these two thugs mug your arse, you are armed with a pistol and your adrenaline is running higher than it ever has in your entire life. The minute you have a chance to pull your gun and pull that trigger you may very well think you are in harms way as this shite goes down in seconds. If they happen to have turned away and got shot in/near the back in the process of a robbery too bad for those assholes. The outcome is a symptom of their decision to initiate the robbery, not of the victim who is in a state of mind he/she likely has never been in.
So don't blame the victim here. Blame the thugs.
So don't blame the victim here. Blame the thugs.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:14 am to HMTVBrian2
quote:
unpopular opinion here i'm sure but if you shoot someone in the back who poses you no (current) threat then you probably should be charged
I guess it depends. If he's 15 yds away, it might be an issue. 10 ft, maybe not.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:23 am to HMTVBrian2
Every mugger should approach walking backwards 
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:25 am to BowDownToLSU
When was the last time you saw a story about blacks being robbed by whites at gunpoint?
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:25 am to LSU Wayne
quote:
The outcome is a symptom of their decision to initiate the robbery, not of the victim who is in a state of mind he/she likely has never been in.
The courts decide that
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:25 am to BowDownToLSU
Dosumfin bout dat dindunuffin
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:28 am to BowDownToLSU
I guess this might be our last resort to curb some of this activity. There's just so much a community can take before they take matters into their own hands.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:28 am to upgrayedd
quote:
I guess it depends. If he's 15 yds away, it might be an issue. 10 ft, maybe not.
idk, just my opinion that if the situation's done and they're leaving, not really posing a threat anymore, don't see the point in plugging someone just because they stole your stuff.
doesn't lessen their wrong at all, but i mean killing someone who's leaving the area and not threatening you anymore is also wrong imo. i think all human life is valuable even shitty humans because shitty humans can be rectified under the right circumstances and taking a life unnecessarily doesn't make sense
if a dude's got a gun in your face and you take him out that's different to me.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:31 am to LesMiles BFF
I will chip in to help pay for the shooters lawyer fees
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:33 am to HMTVBrian2
You should have a right to protect your assets too
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:35 am to HMTVBrian2
quote:
if a dude's got a gun in your face and you take him out that's different to me.
If someone threatened your life with a gun, even just to steal your shite, then they are an existing threat until they are eliminated/arrested/etc. A person has the right to defend themselves against them. If they are still armed, it is mutual combat and self defense. The only way this isn't justified is if a witness can say that the muggers dropped their guns, got on their knees, asked for forgiveness and then were executed. Otherwise, the victim was in the right..
Popular
Back to top


9








