- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More Censorship - this time Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro and Dan Bongino
Posted on 1/12/21 at 10:54 am to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 1/12/21 at 10:54 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
The irony in all of this, is that this is a perfect example of capitalism.
If the viewers/listeners want to discuss voter irregularities, the capitalistic thing to do would be to meet their demands.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 10:55 am to goofball
quote:They were inciting violence by continuing to insist there were voting irregularities despite a lack of evidence. This is like a law that requires people to wear seatbelts. People should be smart enough to know better, but because so many do not an adult is required to step in and save stupid people from themselves.
They weren't spreading racism, hate, or even endorsing riots. They were discussing irregularities in the election.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 10:57 am to MLU
quote:
This is like a law that requires people to wear seatbelts. People should be smart enough to know better, but because so many do not an adult is required to step in and save stupid people from themselves.
That law is to generate revenue under the guise of safety

Posted on 1/12/21 at 10:58 am to OweO
quote:
Stop saying its "censorship", You make it sound like its an attack on free speech.
Then what is it call when one side can't say anything and the other can say whatever they want?
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:04 am to MLU
quote:
They were inciting violence by continuing to insist there were voting irregularities despite a lack of evidence
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) previously stated, “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.
Sen. Cory Booker encouraged people to “get up in the face of some congresspeople.” Nicolle Wallace encouraged Jeb Bush to punch Trump in the face. Madonna thought about blowing up the White House. Actor Johnny Depp despicably commented about assassinating a president. Additional examples abound.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:13 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
That law is to generate revenue under the guise of safety
Imagine believing cops pull people over for public safety. These people vote and procreate. Clown world.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:15 am to windshieldman
quote:
I don't think many Repubs were for churches and businesses being forced to shut down for the last year, especially by the government.
No, but they are against legalization of pot, they are against abortion, and they want government to punish companies that are censoring.
That's three examples of wanting more government control in their lives.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:15 am to MLU
quote:
They were inciting violence by continuing to insist there were voting irregularities despite a lack of evidence.
so anyone that pushes false or unproven narratives that lead to violence or rioting should be censored...?
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:16 am to The Spleen
quote:
What happened is they saw several corporations announce they were suspending political contributions to lawmakers that objected to the election results, and feared that could trickle down to their advertising coffers if their radio and TV personalities did the same.
That's possible. Again, it's all about money. If all they cared about was ideology, we'd have nothing but liberal talk show hosts on the radio.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:17 am to goofball
Take this cry baby shite back to the QAnon board
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:17 am to Salmon
quote:
what?
The government isn't stopping people with threatening arrest or shutting down new outlets.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:18 am to dewster
quote:
If the viewers/listeners want to discuss voter irregularities, the capitalistic thing to do would be to meet their demands.
My guess is for every 1 listener that wants to discuss it, 3 listeners want to move on.
Majority rules, right?
Don't let the echo chamber of this board fool you. Right or wrong, the vast majority of people are ready to move on. If you find actual proof, come back and bring it up. Until then, it's time to discuss something else.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:18 am to Tempratt
quote:
The government isn't stopping people with threatening arrest or shutting down new outlets.
censorship =/= freedom of speech
jesus fricking christ
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:19 am to Salmon
quote:
I assume this happens all the time in media, for all kinds of reasons
Yep. No way in hell are you allowed to talk about the president-elect and pedophilic tendencies.
And then some things you have to talk about endlessly like Orange Man Bad and golden showers.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:19 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Don't let the echo chamber of this board fool you
Seriously, what board do you read? If the OT is an echo chamber to you, I mean I don't know what to tell you

Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:23 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
Why is this good?
Radio is now monopolized. It needs to be broken up. There was a time when it wasn't legal to own more than one station in a given market unless it was a combo.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:24 am to junkfunky
quote:
And then some things you have to talk about endlessly like Orange Man Bad and golden showers.
Yes. Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, and Dan Bongino definitely do this.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:24 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
No, but they are against legalization of pot, they are against abortion, and they want government to punish companies that are censoring.
Well I’m for legalizing pot and I can’t think of a single republican that I personally know under 50 thats against it. Abortion is murder so of course we are against it, but that’s for another thread
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:24 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Seriously, what board do you read? If the OT is an echo chamber to you, I mean I don't know what to tell you
LOL, I got confused, I thought this was on the PT board. =)
This should be on the P-T Board, which is that echo chamber.
Posted on 1/12/21 at 11:26 am to Tempratt
quote:
Radio is now monopolized. It needs to be broken up. There was a time when it wasn't legal to own more than one station in a given market unless it was a combo.
I've said this before. It's not a monopoly but you can make the argument, I think, that it's an oligopoly.
Now, should they be allowed to be that?
Popular
Back to top
