- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:24 pm to goofball
I'm going with the county officials are all liberal and fricked over those in the poor black community.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:27 pm to goofball
quote:
argued that a ruling in favor of Rafaeli would set a precedent that could ultimately bankrupt Michigan counties by forcing local governments to compensate all homeowners in similar situations.
Good. Stop being fricking assholes to your citizens and shite like this won't happen.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:29 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Unfortunately property has way less rights than you do.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:30 pm to goofball
But do they have drinking water?
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:33 pm to goofball
I read that initially at $8.41 million tax debt because in my mind there is no way they take a house over $8 in debt
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:36 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Private property is a myth.
Yep... You might own it outright; however, you still have to pay the government rent every year...
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:44 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
in my mind there is no way they take a house over $8 in debt
And that’s not even an issue the court had with it.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:58 pm to goofball
quote:
It appears your actions as Treasurer to foreclose on an Oakland County retiree’s property for $8.41 has exposed the county to serious risk,”
Yes we are angry at you for putting us in danger of being sued, NOT because you’re a morally reprehensible dick bag
Posted on 7/27/20 at 3:59 pm to WestSideTiger
Yeah I just read that. Both the actions and the states reaction is infuriating.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 4:02 pm to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
Michigan retiree's home seized for an $8.41 tax bill
quote:So the 80 yr old man got $24,491.59 for the sell of this house.
1,500-square-foot house in the Detroit suburb of Southfield was seized in 2014 and then sold for $24,500, with the county keeping all the earnings
.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 4:09 pm to RT1941
quote:
So the 80 yr old man got $24,491.59 for the sell of this house.
Minus penalties, etc it’s what they are now saying he should have received. Most of the properties are blighted and unoccupied. So if you are in favor of fixing that issue then this was not a win. The present case was just a bad application of that system.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 4:09 pm to RT1941
quote:
So the 80 yr old man got $24,491.59 for the sell of this house.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 5:18 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
I thought tax sale they had to give owner amount after tax debt paid
well yes but they are allowed to deduct for expenses and processing fees and other BS to make bank off of and i bet it was a shady sale so someones family so they can buy it before the public gets a chance to and the insider buys it at pennies on the dollar, so a $500k house sells for $50k to uncle bob.
you hear stories all the time about prime properties being sold at unannounced unadvertised sales so no one else knows about it to bid on it
Posted on 7/27/20 at 6:13 pm to goofball
Tried to find some additional info and this case, and found this nugget:
You can’t make this shite up.
Also found that Rafaeli bought the house in 2011 for $60,000. So even if they paid him the full $24,500 from the tax sale, he still would have taken a $35,500 loss on the property over an $8 tax bill.
Oh, AND he apparently underpaid the taxes in 2011 but paid in full 2012 and 2013, and actually paid the original balance in 2013 as well:
It blows my mind that the government gets away with this kind of shite.
quote:
The Michigan Supreme Court issued a sweeping rebuke last week to Oakland County's decision to seize a retiree's home over $8.41 in unpaid taxes. Now county officials are worried they could be on the hook for more than $30 million in payments to former homeowners victimized by the same aggressive forfeiture scheme.
quote:
Like many other counties in Michigan, Oakland County maintains a "delinquent tax revolving fund" (DTRF) where the proceeds from tax asset forfeitures are deposited. If the county has a positive balance in its DTRF at the end of a fiscal year, the excess funds can be channeled into the county budget.
quote:
In Oakland County, where Rafaeli's Southfield property was seized and sold in 2014, the process has been lucrative too. According to the county's most recent comprehensive annual financial report, its DTRF had $196.8 million in net assets.
You can’t make this shite up.
Also found that Rafaeli bought the house in 2011 for $60,000. So even if they paid him the full $24,500 from the tax sale, he still would have taken a $35,500 loss on the property over an $8 tax bill.
Oh, AND he apparently underpaid the taxes in 2011 but paid in full 2012 and 2013, and actually paid the original balance in 2013 as well:
quote:
Rafaeli tried to pay the full 2011 tax debt in January, 2013. But he mistakenly did not factor in interest growing on the debt, and underpaid by $8.41.
It blows my mind that the government gets away with this kind of shite.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 6:24 pm to lostinbr
What a sad, sick story. Someone needs to be publicly flogged for this. I’d have paid the old guy’s $8 tax. FFS
Posted on 7/27/20 at 6:31 pm to goofball
I didn’t read the article, but I’ll guarantee there’s a whole lot more to the story than they are telling you...
Posted on 7/27/20 at 6:44 pm to Spankum
quote:
I didn’t read the article, but I’ll guarantee there’s a whole lot more to the story than they are telling you...
Does “more to the story” change the fact that the county seized his property over $8.41 in unpaid interest on taxes and didn’t even give him the net proceeds from the tax sale?
Because if not, I’m not sure how it changes anything.
Posted on 7/27/20 at 7:05 pm to biglego
I’m pissed after reading this shite. What kind of heartless, spineless, soulless, greedy, small-minded arrogant jackass would think this was appropriate?
Popular
Back to top


1




