- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mass shooting on Vegas Strip discussion
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:33 am to Scruffy
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:33 am to Scruffy
quote:Lots of possibilities imo. He might be a recluse and tell her don't take his pic, I know a couple people that hate being in pics. Or, maybe he wasn't that close with her. Maybe "gf" actually means he paid her for pussy every now and then when she was in town. So many different factors it's hard to formulate opinion right now.
People don't find it strange that she takes frequent pictures, yet he isn't included in any?
1
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:33 am to baldona
quote:
His girlfriend regularly takes pictures of her travels.
Where are these pictures?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:34 am to baldona
quote:
I don't expect the police to release anything, but its still mind blowing the world of the internet and media has not found more on this guy. There's almost nothing, as said less than 5 pictures on a 64 year old is pretty incredible.
Doesn't seem unusual at all, I know a lot of people that keep their internet presence as close to zero as possible, myself included even with my full name and address you will not find a single photo.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:35 am to Hammertime
quote:In a general sense, yes, I agree, but I bet you would be surprised at the number of photos with you in them that exist.
My GFs have all been on FB. They don't post pictures of everything they do. Like I said earlier, I don't take pictures, and I'm rarely in pictures. I just don't like it, and I don't care what anyone else thinks of what I'm doing or have done
It's really not hard to stay offline
With you actively trying to stay offline, apparently, do you believe there are only 2-3 from over the previous 5 years?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:36 am to Hammertime
Yeah that's definitely true, still even if his picture was in fact taken, finding it would still be very difficult. You'd have to just blindly search shooting event pictures looking for him in the background.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:36 am to EA6B
quote:
Doesn't seem unusual at all, I know a lot of people that keep their internet presence as close to zero as possible, myself included even with my full name and address you will not find a single photo.
Putting aside internet, the amount of reporters digging around and not one has come up with a decent picture?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:38 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Putting aside internet, the amount of reporters digging around and not one has come up with a decent picture?
Journalists are incredibly lazy these days.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:38 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:Nobody feels entitled.
Tell me, why do you think you’re entitled to such pertinent information right away?
We've seen many many many events like this. Info comes out. Our subconscious tickers are feeling a bit off, due to how we're used to receiving info after these things.
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 11:41 am
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:38 am to Psychoanalysis
quote:
Neither of these things require social media presence or hundreds of online pictures. Maybe you get a picture from his pilot's license.
Pilots license do not have your picture, have one in my wallet.
I also see nothing unusual about the guy's lack of internet presence, lots of people are like that.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:39 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
ehhhh
I'm not saying it's fact, but for the sake of discussion follow me on this.
Would it be logical to propose he could have done more damage with single shots recentered rather than bursting entire magazines at a time?
Remember he's spraying over the stage and into the crowd. Each bump and rise of the gun would spread the bullets farther over the crowd and then eventually miss it altogether.
Based on earlier calculations about rise and relationship, i.e. a couple inches rise from his distance equals a hundred yards or so off target, I wouldn't be surprised if there were a bunch of bullets lodged in the ground for a hundred yards or more past the venue baracades.
Thinking like that, maybe the first half of each mag hits the crowd, the second half goes over them and hits dirt.
Had he pulled the trigger slowly and methodically he could've kept more bullets directed into the crowd rather than sprayed past them. Even at a second per bullet, with 10 preloaded guns at 30 rounds each he could've got off 300 rounds in 5 minutes and conceivably hit more people with them.
Does that make sense?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:40 am to Golfer
quote:Yea, no argument there.
Journalists are incredibly lazy these days.
Hell, it took Crowder and Not Gay Jared to finally have someone infiltrate ANTIFA, and they are a YouTube show.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:41 am to Psychoanalysis
quote:
I'm not saying it's fact, but for the sake of discussion follow me on this.
Would it be logical to propose he could have done more damage with single shots recentered rather than bursting entire magazines at a time?
Remember he's spraying over the stage and into the crowd. Each bump and rise of the gun would spread the bullets farther over the crowd and then eventually miss it altogether.
Based on earlier calculations about rise and relationship, i.e. a couple inches rise from his distance equals a hundred yards or so off target, I wouldn't be surprised if there were a bunch of bullets lodged in the ground for a hundred yards or more past the venue baracades.
Thinking like that, maybe the first half of each mag hits the crowd, the second half goes over them and hits dirt.
Had he pulled the trigger slowly and methodically he could've kept more bullets directed into the crowd rather than sprayed past them. Even at a second per bullet, with 10 preloaded guns at 30 rounds each he could've got off 300 rounds in 5 minutes and conceivably hit more people with them.
Does that make sense?
No, not at all. please hush now.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:41 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
We've seen many many many events like this. Info comes out. Our subconscious tickers are feeling a bit off, due to what we're used to receiving info after these things.
It's been less than than 48 hours dude. Just relax
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:44 am to Psychoanalysis
59 dead and 527 injuries and you are arguing on how he could do more damage. 
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:44 am to Scruffy
I haven't taken a picture that was posted online in over 5 years, and even that one was a big group. I was wearing a helmet and behind someone, so you can only see half of my face. You wouldn't be able to pick me out unless you knew me.
It's not hard to keep yourself under wraps. I don't see why this guy has to put himself out there. It is 100% plausible he doesn't have any more pictures online. I know my dad only has his business picture, and pictures in large groups
It's not hard to keep yourself under wraps. I don't see why this guy has to put himself out there. It is 100% plausible he doesn't have any more pictures online. I know my dad only has his business picture, and pictures in large groups
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 11:47 am
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:45 am to slackster
So far, this is what I've found on Paddock:
He owned this home in Reno:
$227k taxable fair value
Bought in 2013
LINK
He owned this home in Mesquite, NV:
(no picture)
$353k taxable fair value
Bought in 2015
LINK
He owns Paradise Ranch 21, LLC, which had a 3.5795% stake in five parcel purchases:
Total purchase price was $8.6MM, making his stake $308K
Purchased in 7/2004
Original Purchase Record
The property history is tough to follow for a novice such as myself, but he still owns a stake in two current parcels:
Parcel No. 179-34-810-015 - Taxable Value $1.54MM - his stake valued at $55k
Parcel No. 179-34-810-016 - Taxable Value $580k - his stake valued at $20.7k
He owned this home in Reno:
$227k taxable fair value
Bought in 2013
LINK
He owned this home in Mesquite, NV:
(no picture)
$353k taxable fair value
Bought in 2015
LINK
He owns Paradise Ranch 21, LLC, which had a 3.5795% stake in five parcel purchases:
Total purchase price was $8.6MM, making his stake $308K
Purchased in 7/2004
Original Purchase Record
The property history is tough to follow for a novice such as myself, but he still owns a stake in two current parcels:
Parcel No. 179-34-810-015 - Taxable Value $1.54MM - his stake valued at $55k
Parcel No. 179-34-810-016 - Taxable Value $580k - his stake valued at $20.7k
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:46 am to Psychoanalysis
quote:It would just hit more people and more people...eventually missing. Then all he'd have to do recenter.
Each bump and rise of the gun would spread the bullets farther over the crowd and then eventually miss it altogether.
And with single shots, I HIGHLY doubt he'd be aiming for foreheads. He'd still be spraying, just WAAAAAAAAAY slower.
And look, you might be 100% correct.
As far as bump fire being a good thing...MAYBE here. But at point blank range, a bump stock would have mowed so many people down at that concert.
Why are bump stocks legal?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:47 am to Scruffy
quote:
Hell, it took Crowder and Not Gay Jared to finally have someone infiltrate ANTIFA, and they are a YouTube show.
The best part is that the news outlets that were onsite didn't even want to look at the video
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:47 am to slackster
That doesn't seem to make him out to be the millionaire real estate guy that was described.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 11:47 am to The Mick
I've been dating my current gf for more than a year and we have less than 5 pictures together. Maybe I'm a weirdo
Page 157 of 398
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News