- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
March For Our Lives: I’m confused
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:09 am
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:09 am
Ok, so let’s say they get assault style weapons banned for sale. Now what?
They don’t think that will put an end to school shootings? What’s the comprehensive plan? What do they want beyond this?
I’m not trying to flame these kids and they are obviously passionate, but want to know what the end game is.
They don’t think that will put an end to school shootings? What’s the comprehensive plan? What do they want beyond this?
I’m not trying to flame these kids and they are obviously passionate, but want to know what the end game is.
This post was edited on 3/28/18 at 6:10 am
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:13 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
assault style weapons
Need definition....a baseball bat is an assault weapon
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:13 am to CharlesLSU
What's confusing?
Why does everything have to have a next step? Maybe the end-game is just getting those weapons banned.
Why does everything have to have a next step? Maybe the end-game is just getting those weapons banned.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:13 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
what the end game is
They don’t even know. It’s nothing more than liberal sensationalism. It’s preaching to “protect the children” by banning guns, while fully supporting the violent murder of thousands of unborn babies with heartbeats and faces.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:13 am to CharlesLSU
The march is political theater put on by groups that want to ban all guns.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:13 am to CharlesLSU
They don’t have a a solution. The march and their “leaders” are far too divisive to make any real progress on the issue.
The march was a fully funded and organized Dem rally, nothing more. Same as the women’s march
ETA: the genius part of the current plan is using these kids then allows them to attack back at anyone who points out these facts because “how dare you question these kids!!1!!!” just as you did in your OP
The march was a fully funded and organized Dem rally, nothing more. Same as the women’s march
ETA: the genius part of the current plan is using these kids then allows them to attack back at anyone who points out these facts because “how dare you question these kids!!1!!!” just as you did in your OP
This post was edited on 3/28/18 at 6:15 am
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:13 am to CharlesLSU
They don't want to stop shootings.
They want your guns.
They want your guns.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:15 am to magildachunks
quote:
Why does everything have to have a next step? Maybe the end-game is just getting those weapons banned.
You're rather naive if you actually think this.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:15 am to magildachunks
quote:
Why does everything have to have a next step? Maybe the end-game is just getting those weapons banned
Insincere post is insincere.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:15 am to magildachunks
quote:
What's confusing?
Why does everything have to have a next step? Maybe the end-game is just getting those weapons banned
Riiight. Just like it was only the 4 monuments that needed to come down in NOLA.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:16 am to weagle99
quote:
The march is political theater put on by groups that want to ban all guns.
Agreed. These marches have nothing to do about ending school shootings. Banning scary black rifles does nothing to improve school safety.
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:16 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Just like it was only the 4 monuments that needed to come down in NOLA.
More than those came down in NOLA?
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:18 am to CharlesLSU
They should call it March because you don't have a life
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:19 am to LNCHBOX
Those 4 statues came down...after other statues around the country...after a confederate flag was taken down outside a SC government building...after Confederate flags were banned on Amazon and Ebay....after Dukes of Hazard was taken off the air...after one crazy fricker who shot up a church had a Facebook pic with a confederate flag in the background.
And they are still fighting more confederate removals to this day around the country.
If this doesn’t prove how hard and strong liberals grasp on to something, push for the inch, then take the whole interstate then I don’t know what does.
And they are still fighting more confederate removals to this day around the country.
If this doesn’t prove how hard and strong liberals grasp on to something, push for the inch, then take the whole interstate then I don’t know what does.
This post was edited on 3/28/18 at 6:25 am
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:22 am to Eighteen
Why can’t we just give them California for their little Utopian world they want? Then we can get back to punishing the criminal instead of an object. Just continue The Wall straight up the California border. Problem solved!!
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:22 am to CharlesLSU
Like sand through the hourglass, these are the....
This post was edited on 3/28/18 at 6:23 am
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:23 am to Eighteen
I would prefer the March for Life
If we cannot protect the most innocent and vulnerable, how can we really call to protect anyone else?
If we cannot protect the most innocent and vulnerable, how can we really call to protect anyone else?
Posted on 3/28/18 at 6:24 am to biglosdaddy
quote:
would prefer the March for Life
If we cannot protect the most innocent and vulnerable, how can we really call to protect anyone else?
Would you be willing to entertain a tradeoff?
Ban guns for banning abodtions?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News