- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Making Tesla car batteries creates as much pollution as a normal car for 3-6 years
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:11 pm to weagle99
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:11 pm to weagle99
quote:
Do you have any kind of argument or are you just going to asurob all over this thread with emojis?
Why argue with you? This is beyond a stupid article and premise
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:12 pm to weagle99
I don't give a shite about the pollution aspects.
If an $30K electric car can get me from paying $250/month in gasoline to $25/month in electricity, I will buy it without hesitation.
If an $30K electric car can get me from paying $250/month in gasoline to $25/month in electricity, I will buy it without hesitation.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:13 pm to Sao
What is stupid about it? It's a widely understood criticism of EV vehicles. OP is actually somewhat Germans if anything.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:13 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Halved isn't zero.
People on this board and elsewhere think it is zero now.
People on this board and elsewhere think it is zero now.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:13 pm to weagle99
Don't think give a eff about emissions. People want them because they are cool
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:15 pm to Lou Pai
quote:
It's a widely understood criticism of EV vehicles. OP is actually somewhat Germans if anything.
Do they have an impact? Yes. Is it less than fossil fuel energy, and continuing to be less and less so all the time? Also yes. That's the point. Stop looking at only one part of the equation.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:15 pm to skullhawk
quote:
more likely to see someone bang a rail
I do this all the time.
That's when you masturbating onto a train track right?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:17 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
I don't give a shite about the pollution aspects.
If an $30K electric car can get me from paying $250/month in gasoline to $25/month in electricity, I will buy it without hesitation.
The govt will figure out how to tax you for road use since you aren't paying fuel tax like the rest of us.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:18 pm to weagle99
This isn't a surprise to common sense people.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:18 pm to Chucktown_Badger
What type of fuel source for EVs does the environmental community support?
Coal? Nope
Nuclear? Seems like a nope
Hydro? Damming rivers is a nope
Wind? NIMBY and muh birds
Solar? You can't capture enough sunlight
Natural gas? Nope - fossil fuel
So...?
Coal? Nope
Nuclear? Seems like a nope
Hydro? Damming rivers is a nope
Wind? NIMBY and muh birds
Solar? You can't capture enough sunlight
Natural gas? Nope - fossil fuel
So...?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:18 pm to ell_13
I think most people are very open to alternative energy and new technologies. They just don't want the government picking winners and losers based on political, militant environmentalism.
Within reason, let the market work. Big government stifles innovation. It doesn't foster it.
The Paris agreement wasn't going to produce any significant reduction in Earth's temperature, and even the people who drew it up know it.
Within reason, let the market work. Big government stifles innovation. It doesn't foster it.
The Paris agreement wasn't going to produce any significant reduction in Earth's temperature, and even the people who drew it up know it.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:18 pm to Croacka
quote:
The govt will figure out how to tax you for road use
It's called toll roads.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:19 pm to weagle99
quote:
Nuclear? Seems like a nope
Hydro? Damming rivers is a nope
Wind? NIMBY and muh birds
Solar? You can't capture enough sunlight
Most reasonable environmentalists endorse all of these.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:21 pm to Croacka
quote:
The govt will figure out how to tax you for road use since you aren't paying fuel tax like the rest of us.
Ummmmmmmmm they already do?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:23 pm to weagle99
quote:
People on this board and elsewhere think it is zero now.
I can just about guarantee that no one on Earth (with a functional brain) thought the Tesla had zero emissions. That would be the most absurd assumption I've heard of in quite some time
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:24 pm to Croacka
quote:
They use like 15x more energy or material to produce vs a plastic grocery bag
That means you have to use it 15x before making any net impact on the environment.
Not really. You just have to use one reusable bag to replace 15 regular bags. I've generally found that a reusable bag can hold more than a disposable. If one reusable bag can hold the same amount as two disposable, then it only takes 8 uses before the reusable bag has surpassed the disposable bags.
Most people probably make 8 trips to the grocery in 3 months.
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:25 pm to weagle99
Tesla's suck. 9hr charge to only go 250 miles. Oh and the cars are 60k+. And Elon wonders why nobody is buying his cars
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:25 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:um. I think you'd be very surprised
can just about guarantee that no one on Earth (with a functional brain) thought the Tesla had zero emissions. That would be the most absurd assumption I've heard of in quite some time
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:26 pm to Breesus
quote:
Which gas powered car? How do you know that? Which level of gas? With what maintenance?
You don't think they are looking at average numbers?
Posted on 6/21/17 at 1:28 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Is it less than fossil fuel energy
In the manufacture of the vehicles? Not as far as I know.
Popular
Back to top


1









