- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Livingston teacher and LPSO husband booked on Rape/Child Porn
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:10 am to YouAre8Up
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:10 am to YouAre8Up
Oh you down voted me for not defended both the sick fricks. How will I ever sleep tonight? 
Dennis was fricked up way before he landed his dream job of being a cop.
Dennis was fricked up way before he landed his dream job of being a cop.
1
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:11 am to LSUTigerFan247
For the life of me, I will never understand grown arse women that like to frick little boys, especially little boys they are in a position of trust and authority over like a teacher or coach and they are women that are supposed to be protective and nurturing of children.
It's one of the most vile and disgusting things ever. They must have a really strong Jocasta complex.
It's one of the most vile and disgusting things ever. They must have a really strong Jocasta complex.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:14 am to Sentrius
Isn’t the typical psychology that they weren’t the popular girl in school when they attended so, now that they are back and getting attention, they are living out fantasies as if they were still that age?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:14 am to YouAre8Up
quote:
YouAre8Up
You do know you are responding to yourself don’t you?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:17 am to Martini
I was directing my comment at what's his name. I didn't feel like making a quote so I just hit reply to make a post. Yes I do know. 
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:30 am to Evil Little Thing
quote:
That would be unconstitutional.
Incorrect
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:35 am to YouAre8Up
quote:
You do understand that when the house was raided many photos and videos were sized, right? You must be a "close" friend of one/both of them.
Not a friend nor do I know either of these people.
Do you understand that unless you are law enforcement that participated in the investigation, you have no idea what the photos and videos that were "sized" depict. You also dont know on what devices they were found on, who the owner of those devices were, or who had access to those devices.
I am not defending the alleged actions of these people.
I am simply saying people who read one news story and a thread on here and can conclude they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt are ignorant and uninformed.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:41 am to tigersfirst
Ok cool.
But you do understand that if your bond is set at $500,000 for Cynthia and her husband is set at $1,675,000 then it's not some misunderstanding, right?
But you do understand that if your bond is set at $500,000 for Cynthia and her husband is set at $1,675,000 then it's not some misunderstanding, right?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:50 am to YouAre8Up
A bond obligation means probable cause has been found.
It has nothing to do with determining if there is a misunderstanding or not.
It has nothing to do with determining if there is a misunderstanding or not.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:55 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Her facebook bio:
"I am married to my best friend. My children are my world. Teaching is my passion."
This made me giggle: a friend of mines whore wife has
"Devoted mother of four, child of god on hers"
What she left off is that the 4 are from 3 different fathers and she's currently cheating on her 3 rd husband
Psssst whores and facebook
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:59 am to tigersfirst
quote:
People are innocent until proven guilty in the United States of America
quote:
I think they are probably guilty.
did you just confuse an opinion with a decision of a jury?
guess what? i'm a criminal defense attorney. i think they're probably guilty, too. LEO, esp the AG or feds, don't frick up CP cases.
This post was edited on 10/24/19 at 8:00 am
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:59 am to The Torch
Supposedly 3 of the kids are adopted.
Which begs a whole other line of questioning.
Which begs a whole other line of questioning.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:59 am to tigersfirst
quote:
Probably guilty of what?
You have not even seen the affidavit for arrest warrant yet. It will contain a summary of facts to show probable cause for an arrest. Probable cause is an extremely low standard.
You certainly haven't been able to view the numerous police reports that contain more detailed narratives showing how the investigation unfolded and what evidence was discovered.
You haven't seen the state present their case in court and try to prove each element of the offenses charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
When you see the National Center for Exploited Children as the tipster, you can bet your arse its a 99.9% rock solid case. They infiltrate child predator rings who trade videos and photos and are constantly providing law enforcement with IP addresses where this crap is originating. I guarantee that they provided the AG's office with all the data, who then got a subpoena for both of their phone records and have probably been monitoring them for a few weeks to solidify the case. Sure they're legally considered innocent until proven guilty in the USA, but this is far from hear-say situation where evidence is concerned.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:59 am to tigersfirst
What about “they were both found to have been naked with an unclothed child in a picture” do you not understand?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:01 am to tigersfirst
Found the bootlicker pretending they give a shite about the constitution outside of when it fits their own purposes.
The cop threw his phone into the lake to avoid having it used as evidence. That’s about as close to an admission of guilt as you can get to this point.
The cop threw his phone into the lake to avoid having it used as evidence. That’s about as close to an admission of guilt as you can get to this point.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:02 am to teke184
This story has made national news this morning....
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:02 am to LSUAngelHere1
I’m sure there is probably a 4000 comment thread at Fark on this.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:04 am to Sentrius
quote:
For the life of me, I will never understand grown arse women that like to frick little boys, especially little boys they are in a position of trust and authority over like a teacher or coach and they are women that are supposed to be protective and nurturing of children.
It's one of the most vile and disgusting things ever. They must have a really strong Jocasta complex.
it may be more of a thing where she fell in with a controlling guy who "made" her participate
these situations fascinate me. not the child rape/porn stuff (i put that stuff in a mental quarantine where it's just words b/c the actual thoughts are so horrible). i mean the times when you have 2 sickos in a relationship who continue this sort of abhorrent behavior at the very peak of pathology
how do they meet? is this just sprung on one of them at some point like a normal kink? do they find each other through child abuse channels? it's all crazy and not often covered very well
This post was edited on 10/24/19 at 8:05 am
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:06 am to LSUTigerFan247
quote:
Sure they're legally considered innocent until proven guilty in the USA, but this is far from hear-say situation where evidence is concerned.
this is not a court of law. we are not jurors. it's totally legal to have opinions, sometimes uninformed, of cases
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
is this just sprung on one of them at some point like a normal kink?
That’s what I was wondering. Like he’s laying in bed one night and says “ Hey, I have an idea...”.
Page 18 of 121
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News