- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let's get more realistic - Full US War Machine vs. World
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:50 pm
Can the 300 million of the US survive 7 billion of the world.
No nukes or chemicals.
US running at full war capacity vs world.
My vote is "yes". Have the largest Navy and 2 largest air forces. Plenty of food and fuel and geographically tough for land invasion.
No nukes or chemicals.
US running at full war capacity vs world.
My vote is "yes". Have the largest Navy and 2 largest air forces. Plenty of food and fuel and geographically tough for land invasion.
32
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:50 pm to DarthRebel
Yes. 
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:50 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
No nukes or chemicals
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:52 pm to DarthRebel
Who strikes first?
Either way the US is going to win... just determines by how much.
Either way the US is going to win... just determines by how much.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:52 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
No nukes or chemicals.
Still have MOAB's
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:52 pm to DarthRebel
nope....
we would destroy ourselves from the inside.... country is so divided we would cut off our nose to spite our face....
we would destroy ourselves from the inside.... country is so divided we would cut off our nose to spite our face....
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:53 pm to DarthRebel
Depends.
Due to our geographic location, I don't think the world and its 7 billion could ever truly invade the United States.
Instead, Muslims are doing it nice and slow by taking advantage of the mouthbreathing left, who think that a Muzzie won't stab them in the face if they have a 'COEXIST' sticker.
Due to our geographic location, I don't think the world and its 7 billion could ever truly invade the United States.
Instead, Muslims are doing it nice and slow by taking advantage of the mouthbreathing left, who think that a Muzzie won't stab them in the face if they have a 'COEXIST' sticker.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:53 pm to DarthRebel
China ain't no pushover...
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:53 pm to DarthRebel
We win if we are just defending our land.
Our navy dick(minus terd) > world
Our navy dick(minus terd) > world
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:54 pm to DarthRebel
No way...the Canadian border is too large to defend. The world could funnel billions through that area and stretch the US thin.
Now, if Canada and Mexico assisted the US then I think it gets even more interesting.
How many subs do we have globally? Could we destroy their ships before they even get to North America?
Now, if Canada and Mexico assisted the US then I think it gets even more interesting.
How many subs do we have globally? Could we destroy their ships before they even get to North America?
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:55 pm to DarthRebel
How many democrats are fighting?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:55 pm to TDcline
quote:
Due to our geographic location, I don't think the world and its 7 billion could ever truly invade the United States.
with 7 billion people they could overpower us. we would have to attack them everywhere, China, Europe, south America, Russia, india, japan, etc, etc etc. we would be stretched thin fighting that many different wars at once.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:55 pm to DarthRebel
Depends on what you mean by survive or victory.
My opinion is at best we could get them to the negotiating table. And it would have to be a defensive war for us, our resources would be spread too thin to fight on multiple continents
Eta:
Actually on second thought we lose. I think we could hold them off for awhile but eventually the world would ramp up production of navy and air force and we wouldn't be able to stop them. They would eventually over power us.
This is in the no nukes scenario
My opinion is at best we could get them to the negotiating table. And it would have to be a defensive war for us, our resources would be spread too thin to fight on multiple continents
Eta:
Actually on second thought we lose. I think we could hold them off for awhile but eventually the world would ramp up production of navy and air force and we wouldn't be able to stop them. They would eventually over power us.
This is in the no nukes scenario
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:56 pm to DarthRebel
This is why we should build the wall. Scrap that, conquer Mexico in a blitz and then push all the way down to the Panama Canal. Also annex Canada.
But...if nukes are off the table...you could just aggressively patrol the seas and sink any invasion fleet and shoot down any aircraft that try and land.
But you'd have to purge all these lily-livered pantywaists from the military. And take the gloves off.
We'd have to kill tens of thousands for every casualty we'd suffer.
We'd have to annihilate huge civilian centers. Be absolutely ruthless and take no quarter.
Burn the crops and fields of everywhere else. Round up immigrant insurgents and execute them.
You'd have to become a dictatorship in order to counter the propaganda, and have competent tactical leaders.
It could be done, but the price would be horrific.
But...if nukes are off the table...you could just aggressively patrol the seas and sink any invasion fleet and shoot down any aircraft that try and land.
But you'd have to purge all these lily-livered pantywaists from the military. And take the gloves off.
We'd have to kill tens of thousands for every casualty we'd suffer.
We'd have to annihilate huge civilian centers. Be absolutely ruthless and take no quarter.
Burn the crops and fields of everywhere else. Round up immigrant insurgents and execute them.
You'd have to become a dictatorship in order to counter the propaganda, and have competent tactical leaders.
It could be done, but the price would be horrific.
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:56 pm to DarthRebel
Oh this thread again
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:57 pm to DarthRebel
What is winning? Occupying territory would be tough, but there would be less than 0% chance of a successful invasion of the USA.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:57 pm to lynxcat
The world would have a hard time moving troops there without getting blown to shite
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:57 pm to TDcline
quote:
Due to our geographic location, I don't think the world and its 7 billion could ever truly invade the United States.
Brah, it's already going down.....
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:58 pm to DarthRebel
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:59 pm to DarthRebel
Biological weapons allowed?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News