Started By
Message

re: "Leaky" vaccines= worsening viruses

Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:39 am to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108585 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:39 am to
quote:

All I want to know right now is -- does an unvaccinated person transmit the virus "easier" than a vaccinated person?

Absolutely yes as it relates to rate and probability
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 8:40 am
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85397 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:40 am to
quote:

“Vaccine failure” means the vaccine failed to prevent the vaccinated.


Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20798 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Its the same fallacy as "viruses always mutate less deadly"

I "Always" love the always & never statements, because they "never" come back to bite the person that said that in the arse.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 8:43 am
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
30239 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Umm. No. “Vaccine failure” means the vaccine failed to prevent the vaccinated.


In the context of the linked study you are incorrect. I understand that your opinion of what a vaccine is supposed to do is different from the study.
Posted by Lestradamus
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
347 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:43 am to
quote:

People seem to think viruses replicate to avoid antibodies, instead of understanding replication is 100% random


A virus will mutate when given enough opportunities, no one is doubting that. If those opportunities are in vaccinated individuals (although they are less than a vaccinated individual), a mutation that is “invisible” to the antibodies is possible, no? That mutation can become the dominant strain in the individual and pass it on to another individual…or is that just clearly not a possibility?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108585 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:43 am to
Well even more likely would be wrong here

There is the same chance a virus mutates to a more deadly variant as a less deadly one. It’s completely random. However, deadly variants are less less likely to circulate so they die off quicker
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
15889 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:44 am to
quote:

As are the wannabe "experts" who read shite online and deem themselves to have it all figured out.



Yes, this group pretty much covers everyone who utters a word about "The Truth About" COVID and /or vaccines.

They should STFU, make their own decision and resist the urge to climb up on that soap box to announce to the world how wonderful and smart they are. No one cares.

But that wont happen because too many little turds that never got enough attention early in life want to finally be right about something for once. Again, No one cares.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85397 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:47 am to
hey guys, Snipe really wants us to notice him and how much he totally doesn't care about the vaccines in this thread

Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54838 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:48 am to
quote:

resist the urge to climb up on that soap box
I love irony
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297196 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Because the current variants were around before mass vaccinations occurred


Delta was detected, strangely enough, the same month the vaccines rolled out.
Posted by heatom2
At the plant, baw.
Member since Nov 2010
13060 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Delta was detected, strangely enough, the same month the vaccines rolled out.


In India?
Posted by HammerJackFlash
Member since Sep 2018
833 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Those professionals are complete idiots, and lack even a good high school education level in how viruses work Please, for all that is good in humanity, give me how a vaccine makes more virulent strains? Its absurd and simply throwing words out Nothing "makes" the virus mutate. Its simple, the more hosts and more viral replication that happens, the more mutations. That simple really. Even if a vaccine is only has 10% efficacy, that still helps in reducing replication which therefore helps in reducing mutations



Gene encoding with mRNA vaccines

China military scientist 2018

Genome editing with mRNA - pubmed

DNA and RNA based vaccines - nih.gov

Variant list through early 2023, PCR, Coronavirus Patents

Bill Gates

Not exactly covered in high school.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 8:58 am
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Prepare to listen to the lamentations of the jabbers


It is pretty obvious that the anti-vaxxers on this site are the ones obsessed.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29054 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:54 am to
quote:

If those opportunities are in vaccinated individuals (although they are less than a vaccinated individual), a mutation that is “invisible” to the antibodies is possible, no?
Again what difference do you think it makes in this case if the person is vaccinated or not?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297196 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:57 am to
quote:

anti-vaxxers


The minions carrying water for the propagandist.

We're 9 months into this thing and idiots still using that term.

Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29054 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:59 am to
quote:

We're 9 months into this thing and idiots still using that term.
What is your preferred term? Don't want to offend anyone.
This post was edited on 8/17/21 at 9:02 am
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
15722 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Is the vaccination perfect, no. Does it protect better against hospitalizations, death, mutation, etc...the data says a resounding YES.


Most of the vaccine hesitant people I know agree that the vaccine is successful at what it was designed to do. They are hesitant due to unintended consequences. What are the long term effects?

Unfortunately most physicians answer this question by avoiding it. They quickly answer that the long term effects are simply not dying of Covid. As if the vaccine hesitant are unaware that unvaccinated persons were already surviving at a 99.x% clip.

Avoiding the question by reframing it to their own liking invites even more hesitancy. Why not simply say, I don't know?
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20543 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:01 am to
quote:

What are the long term effects?

You can ask that question about any medicine you put in your body though.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85397 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The minions carrying water for the propagandist.


what should we call the people the actively cheer for the vaccines to fail?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108585 posts
Posted on 8/17/21 at 9:02 am to
Long term effects as it relates to viruses or vaccines have always meant something that presents itself a few weeks after presentation that then lasts into the long term

Only now did it mutate to mean something that doesn’t present itself at all for years and then BAM! just appears
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram