- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 3/6/25 at 2:34 pm to AU86
Posted on 3/6/25 at 2:34 pm to AU86
Based Alexander of Russia defeats heathen non believer manlet Bonaparte who (like Macron):
- Married a much older and barren woman while in his 20's (lol)
- Married a woman taller than him (lol)
- Is an atheist who knows not the love of Christ
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 3/6/25 at 2:40 pm to AU86
quote:
Do you actually believe that the French and Britain could defeat the Russian army?
The Russian army has struggled mightily with Ukraine. I don't think they are a peer to the US. The French and the Turks have had the most consistent funding and have been the most active militaries in terms of operations in Europe. The Brits are not in a great state though. I think depending on the terrain, the Russians could win an attritional war with France, but would struggle with the Turks in places like Eastern Anatolia or in East Thrace and the Turkish Straits.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 2:47 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Russia didn't do that. The Russian winter did that.
Russia still executed the strategy of trading space for time. Disease, logistics (incredibly long supply lines even by modern standards), and guerilla warfare by both Russia cavalry, militia, and peasantry were major factors in addition to winter. (I know, not your comment SirWinston)
quote:
Russia drew the little emperor into their trap and then ensured his Grande Armee had no avenues for succor. The Russian winter is so cold your head would spin. It's like nothing anyone has ever seen. So sad!
Allegedly, it was considered a mild winter by Russian standards, but a mild winter you're not prepared for is equally as a bad as the worst Russian winter. Throw in the extra stuff I mentioned above, and it's a bad, bad time.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 3:09 pm to crazy4lsu
Ursula and Macron are using this situation to establish their European slush fund. If they get it and if it comes down to the real nut cutting time they will drop Zelensky like a hot potato. Z man thinks he is playing them but his days are numbered. They will never go without US security guarantees and Trump is not going to give them.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 3/6/25 at 3:22 pm to AU86
You have a lot of trouble staying on topic, don't you little man?
Since you haven't been paying attention, they already have their increased military spending, which I'm sure you regard as a slush fund.
They really aren't sending their best. Sad!
Since you haven't been paying attention, they already have their increased military spending, which I'm sure you regard as a slush fund.
They really aren't sending their best. Sad!
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 3/6/25 at 4:06 pm to crazy4lsu
'The war continues because of Russia' – Zelensky's full speech at European Council
by The Kyiv Independent March 6, 2025 7:46 PM
Full speech
by The Kyiv Independent March 6, 2025 7:46 PM
Full speech
Posted on 3/6/25 at 4:12 pm to AU86
quote:
Do you actually believe that the French and Britain could defeat the Russian army?
Would the French or British be able to achieve air superiority?
What have we learned about the Russian military?
They are an artillery force with some meat waves... they shell a village to rubble and send waves and waves of ground troops to be mowed down until the opponent has to withdraw simply because they have nothing left to use for cover... then they advance.
Assuming these battles would not be happening in France or on the British Isles, glide bombs and missiles would have a way to go.
Would French or British aircraft be able to take out Russian artillery if they had air superiority? Would organized combined arms tactics defeat "shell them to bits and send in meatwaves?"
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:16 pm to crazy4lsu
Hey Malcolm. As usual your opinion of yourself does not match reality.
Ursula trotted Z man out and announced a 800 billion dollar security plan. "Rearm Europe." Z man is Europe's man in Kiev right now and they want him to stay for awhile to keep the US tied to this debacle and Europe. Europe thinks if they can keep this going they can keep the US tied to Europe. They are in panic mode. In their mind if this thing gets settled Trump could start pulling back from Europe. They dont want that.This new security plan or slush fund is a step to Macron's dream of a EU army just in case Trump tells them to frick off. If he decides to stay, well Ursula has a new slush fund like I said.
Ursula trotted Z man out and announced a 800 billion dollar security plan. "Rearm Europe." Z man is Europe's man in Kiev right now and they want him to stay for awhile to keep the US tied to this debacle and Europe. Europe thinks if they can keep this going they can keep the US tied to Europe. They are in panic mode. In their mind if this thing gets settled Trump could start pulling back from Europe. They dont want that.This new security plan or slush fund is a step to Macron's dream of a EU army just in case Trump tells them to frick off. If he decides to stay, well Ursula has a new slush fund like I said.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:19 pm to AU86
quote:
Hey Malcolm. As usual your opinion of yourself does not match reality.
Who the hell is Malcolm?
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:22 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Who the hell is Malcolm?
The guy in the middle.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:22 pm to Lee B
I see now you think you are a General/military analyst also. Z man should make you his military strategist.
You replacing General Bill who went awol?
General Lunatic Keith or do you prefer Marshall Lunatic Keith? How about Field Marshall?
You replacing General Bill who went awol?
General Lunatic Keith or do you prefer Marshall Lunatic Keith? How about Field Marshall?
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:23 pm to crazy4lsu
Malcolm Nance.
You fit the profile.
You fit the profile.
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:42 pm to AU86
No idea who that is. Good job staying on topic, yet again. You remind me of a more stupid Donald Sterling.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:48 pm to Lee B
It's all one war:
quote:
“What (Trump) wants is to see a total collapse of the Canadian economy, because that will make it easier to annex us.”
After all the pretexts, after all the fake grievances – migrants, fentanyl, trade deficits, banks – there is no longer any doubt. After months of attempting to mollify Donald Trump, only to be struck by the same 25-per-cent, across-the-board tariff first announced in November, the Prime Minister at last saw no reason not to lay out the reality of our situation in the starkest possible terms.
The President of the United States is trying to destroy us.
This is not a trade war. Mr. Trump does not have any legitimate issue he wishes to raise with us, using the tariff to impress upon us how serious he is. It is not a negotiation, in which each side brings something to the table it is willing to trade for something else. But neither can it even be dignified as extortion. The tariff is not intended to extract concessions from us. If it were, we would have heard some sort of concrete demand from him by now. It is intended, purely and simply, to harm us.
And it will not end here. More tariffs are coming, on our steel, on our lumber, plus a “reciprocal” tariff designed to punish us for the crime of collecting a national value-added tax, the GST. That pretext is as baseless as the rest: the GST does not discriminate against imports, but applies equally to all goods and services sold in Canada, domestic or foreign. Again, there is no demand here, or none that could possibly be met. The point is not to force us to the negotiating table.
The point is to break us.
As ever, it is necessary to step out of conventional modes of analysis, to wrap our minds around the full insanity of Mr. Trump’s ambitions. Sucker-punching your nearest neighbour and closest trading partner, even as you are cozying up to Vladimir Putin’s Russia, may not seem to make any sense, until you recall that Mr. Trump has been attacking every other democracy in sight, from Ukraine to Europe to Taiwan.
At which point the penny drops: he sides with the expansionist dictatorships because he agrees with them – because he aims to establish one himself. When he talks about invading Greenland or seizing the Panama Canal – or using “economic force” to annex Canada – he means it.
The good news is that the weapons of economic warfare are, by their nature, mutually punitive. Mr. Trump’s tariffs may hurt our exporters, but they will hurt American consumers, workers and businesses just as much. That’s particularly true in a tightly integrated continental economy such as ours, where parts might move back and forth across the border half a dozen times en route to making the finished product.
Sticking a spoke in the wheels of trade, as Mr. Trump has now done, can only result in higher prices, stalled production lines, broken supply chains, and lost jobs – in America, not just in Canada. Just the threat alone seems already to have spooked investors: not only are stock markets cratering, but the Atlanta Federal Reserve projects that first-quarter GDP in the U.S. will fall by 2.8 per cent annualized.
Of course, the retaliatory measures Canada has announced will do much the same to our consumers and workers. So be it. If this were an ordinary trade war, a spat over this product or that industry, that might be seen as needlessly escalatory.
But this is something quite different. The tariff fight has to be seen in the context of the larger struggle, which – if it were not clear before, it should be crystal-clear now – is existential.
Whatever harm we do to the Americans will probably be only a fraction of the harm they do to themselves. But what is essential at this moment is the demonstration effect: to show that we are unafraid, our resolve is ironclad, and we are willing to pay whatever price we must to preserve our independence.
That cannot, however, be the end of it. Fending off Mr. Trump’s advances may be the immediate imperative. But we must be no less vigilant to reduce our exposure to such attacks in future – by making our investment climate so attractive that businesses will want to locate here, notwithstanding the Trump tariffs; by increasing our productivity enough to offset the efficiency losses from such unwarranted restrictions on trade; by diversifying our trade as much as possible, in favour of more reliable partners.
In time, perhaps, the Americans will come to their senses. But the damage is done. Mr. Trump will never realize his dream of annexation. He has, however, succeeded in destroying the trust between our two nations, probably permanently.
- Andrew Coyne
This post was edited on 3/6/25 at 5:50 pm
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:50 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Based Alexander of Russia defeats heathen non believer manlet Bonaparte who
Is the same manlet height as your boy putin
Posted on 3/6/25 at 5:51 pm to doubleb
Posted on 3/6/25 at 6:04 pm to Lee B
Get out of the war thread with your BS. This is nothing to do with Ukraine.
Posted on 3/6/25 at 6:15 pm to doubleb
Posted on 3/6/25 at 6:21 pm to Decatur
I don’t know if Ukraine can survive the peace process.
Popular
Back to top


1



