- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:36 pm to StormyMcMan
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:36 pm to StormyMcMan
https://twitter.com/Global_Mil_Info/status/1681796571912871938
quote:
A White House National Security Council spokesperson has said that the U.S. has information indicating that Russia has laid additional sea mines in the approaches leading to Ukrainian Ports.
The U.S. is not ruling out that Russia might expand its attacks against civilian shipping in the Black Sea and blame Ukraine.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:39 pm to Chromdome35
This declaration by Russia of what amounts to a blockade of Ukrainian ports, could lead to an interesting challenge to the longstanding American policy of freedom of navigation of the seas.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:40 pm to Chromdome35
Looks like another night of Missile and drone strikes on Odessa
https://twitter.com/Faytuks/status/1681818403483385858
What is a Onyx Cruise Missle??
Video at link
https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1681811494877515776
https://twitter.com/Faytuks/status/1681818403483385858
quote:
More missile launches from Russian strategic bombers towards southern Ukraine. Shahed drones are also airborne heading towards Odesa.
quote:
Reports of more cruise missile launches from Russia's black sea fleet towards southern Ukraine
quote:
Supersonic onyx cruise missiles launched towards Odesa oblast
What is a Onyx Cruise Missle??
quote:
The P-800 Oniks (Russian: ?-800 ?????; English: Onyx), also known in export markets as Yakhont (Russian: ?????; English: ruby), is a Soviet / Russian supersonic anti-ship cruise missile developed by NPO Mashinostroyeniya as a ramjet version of P-80 Zubr. Its GRAU designation is 3M55, the air launched Kh-61 variant also exists. The missile has the NATO codename SS-N-26 "Strobile". Development officially Started in 1983, and in the 1990s the anti-ship missile was tested on the Project 1234.7 ship. in 2002 the missile Passed the whole range of trials and was commissioned.[6] It is reportedly a replacement for the P-270 Moskit, and possibly also of the P-700 Granit.
Description
The missile is carried in flight by aerodynamic lift. A solid-propellant booster is located in the ramjet's combustion chamber and is ejected by the airflow after it has burned out.
Advantages
Over-the-horizon firing range
Full autonomy of combat use ("fire and forget")
A set of flexible ("low-profile sea-skimming", "high-low") trajectories
High supersonic speed in all phases of flight
Full harmonization for a wide range of platforms (surface ships, submarines and land-based launchers)
Possible use of the missile in electronic countermeasures environment and under enemy fire
Video at link
https://twitter.com/Archer83Able/status/1681811494877515776
quote:
For the third day in a row, Russian strikes hit the Ukrainian city of Odesa.
At least one impact in the area of the port tonight.
This post was edited on 7/19/23 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:42 pm to Darth_Vader
Something tells me China was like, "go show us how the west will respond to naval blockades and we let you keep existing"
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:45 pm to Darth_Vader
Yea, This is definitely an escalation from Russia.
I can't decide if they are stupid or if they want to provoke an international incident.
Maybe they figure they have nothing to lose given the already-in-place sanctions.
I don't know a lot about international shipping, would it be normal for cargo ships from NATO or European countries to be in those waters?
I can't decide if they are stupid or if they want to provoke an international incident.
Maybe they figure they have nothing to lose given the already-in-place sanctions.
I don't know a lot about international shipping, would it be normal for cargo ships from NATO or European countries to be in those waters?
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:49 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Stop with the fake claims
What fake claim did I make?
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:51 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Yea, This is definitely an escalation from Russia. I can't decide if they are stupid or if they want to provoke an international incident. Maybe they figure they have nothing to lose given the already-in-place sanctions. I don't know a lot about international shipping, would it be normal for cargo ships from NATO or European countries to be in those waters?
Ukraine is, or was, one of the global leaders in grain supply. Ships from all over the planet load Ukrainian grain into their holds to go to countries everywhere. As for Europe, they can railhead grain from Ukraine. Many other places cannot.
Having said all this, I don’t see Biden actually trying to challenge the Russian blockade. He’s too weak and feckless. He talks a lot of bluster. If you actually study his foreign policy, it’s a complete wreck and actually was a strong contributor to starting this damned war.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:53 pm to Darth_Vader
By treaty Turkey has to approve any naval ships passing in or out of the Black Sea. If they're unwilling to confront Russia over this it's doubtful they would let someone else.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 9:56 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
Your tranny lover is calling you.
Damn Winston. Time to get a new account. You've fricked this one all up.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:04 pm to Jim Rockford
Consider the possibility that NATO says it will provide escort to grain ships transiting the black sea to Odesa. This would give Turkey some political and military cover, they wouldn't have to participate, and they would only have to allow NATO ships to transit through.
Would Russia risk bringing NATO into the war? Does NATO have the balls to call Russia's bluff?
Would Russia risk bringing NATO into the war? Does NATO have the balls to call Russia's bluff?
This post was edited on 7/19/23 at 10:05 pm
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:10 pm to Chromdome35
We did when Reagan was president with warships that were regularly rammed by Russian warships to incite a conflict.
Turkey controls which naval vessels go through the straits to get into it
Turkey controls which naval vessels go through the straits to get into it
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:10 pm to Chromdome35
I wonder if Russia feels that despite the west showering ukraine in equipment, there is hardly any, if any at all, appetite for actual bodies from those countries getting involved. So this is a test to see how low that appetite is.
Ukraine can't stop them from attacking these ships no matter how much equipment the west is willing to give. If the west doesn't want to get directly involved, Russia can blockade with impunity.
Ukraine can't stop them from attacking these ships no matter how much equipment the west is willing to give. If the west doesn't want to get directly involved, Russia can blockade with impunity.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:12 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Consider the possibility that NATO says it will provide escort to grain ships transiting the black sea to Odesa. This would give Turkey some political and military cover, they wouldn't have to participate, and they would only have to allow NATO ships to transit through.
Dangerous move, but not out of the realm of possibilities.
quote:
Would Russia risk bringing NATO into the war? Does NATO have the balls to call Russia's bluff?
That’s the key question. Logic would dictate Russia would avoid pulling NATO into this war at all costs. They already have their hands full dealing with just Ukraine. If NATO joined the war, short of full mobilization, Russia would have zero hope of winning the war. And even with mobilization, their outlook would not be good. And therein lies the rub. Putin knows the Russian people have little stomach for full mobilization, septic it’s obvious he causes the need for it by attacking a NATO ship.
So my gut says, if we were to escort ships to Ukrainian ports, Russia would blink. But there is no guarantee. If that did happen, it’s WWIII. So, needless to say, the stakes are very high.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:13 pm to TigerFanatic99
It's not our place to negotiate a peace when Ukraine only wants Russia out first. So early on chance never happened unless we go back to 2014.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:23 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
This declaration by Russia of what amounts to a blockade of Ukrainian ports, could lead to an interesting challenge to the longstanding American policy of freedom of navigation of the seas.
Yeah, we have been trying to ease away from that business but this may drag us back in.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:35 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
That’s the key question. Logic would dictate Russia would avoid pulling NATO into this war at all costs. They already have their hands full dealing with just Ukraine. If NATO joined the war, short of full mobilization, Russia would have zero hope of winning the war. And even with mobilization, their outlook would not be good. And therein lies the rub. Putin knows the Russian people have little stomach for full mobilization, septic it’s obvious he causes the need for it by attacking a NATO ship.
So my gut says, if we were to escort ships to Ukrainian ports, Russia would blink. But there is no guarantee. If that did happen, it’s WWIII. So, needless to say, the stakes are very high.
I think that this all depends on whether it is deemed that we chop ties between Russia and countries dependent on the grain. To my knowledge, only Turkey has ships which would be considered NATO in the Black Sea. Now if Turkey allows a few US frigates to enter the Black Sea, game on.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:40 pm to CitizenK
This is going to directly impact food supplies in China. I wonder if they have the approval or were they blindsided?
Posted on 7/19/23 at 10:41 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Consider the possibility that NATO says it will provide escort to grain ships transiting the black sea to Odesa. This would give Turkey some political and military cover, they wouldn't have to participate, and they would only have to allow NATO ships to transit through.
I think it’s a bit more complicated because while the treaty gives Turkey control over access to the Black Sea, it also imposes fairly strict limitations on passage of military vessels - particularly from non-Black Sea nations. The treaty doesn’t give Turkey free rein to open/close the Black Sea to whomever; it makes them responsible for enforcing the treaty provisions.
The treaty spells out specific tonnage limits for military vessels (from non-Black Sea nations) allowed to be present in the Black Sea at any given time. It also limits visiting military vessels to 21 days in the Black Sea IIRC.
The entire point of the treaty is to keep other nations from sending warships into the Black Sea to wage war with the 6 Black Sea nations (Turkey, Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, and Bulgaria). If Turkey looks the other way and allows a bunch of NATO vessels to enter, I think that would be seen as a pretty significant escalation/violation of the treaty. At that point it would probably be less escalatory for them to escort the civilian vessels with their own ships.
Posted on 7/19/23 at 11:02 pm to lostinbr
quote:
I think it’s a bit more complicated because while the treaty gives Turkey control over access to the Black Sea, it also imposes fairly strict limitations on passage of military vessels - particularly from non-Black Sea nations. The treaty doesn’t give Turkey free rein to open/close the Black Sea to whomever; it makes them responsible for enforcing the treaty provisions.
The treaty spells out specific tonnage limits for military vessels (from non-Black Sea nations) allowed to be present in the Black Sea at any given time. It also limits visiting military vessels to 21 days in the Black Sea IIRC.
The entire point of the treaty is to keep other nations from sending warships into the Black Sea to wage war with the 6 Black Sea nations (Turkey, Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, and Bulgaria). If Turkey looks the other way and allows a bunch of NATO vessels to enter, I think that would be seen as a pretty significant escalation/violation of the treaty. At that point it would probably be less escalatory for them to escort the civilian vessels with their own ships.
Great commentary, thank you!
Posted on 7/19/23 at 11:34 pm to Chromdome35
Enough bullshite, we have weapon systems in orbit that can eliminate the entire Russian Black Sea fleet overnight. And there isn’t a GD MF thing they can do about it.
Enough already just take the mfers out
Enough already just take the mfers out
Popular
Back to top


2





