- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:15 pm to lsu777
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:15 pm to lsu777
quote:
F**K You! dont get pissed because you were acting all emotional. I know you are close to this and its painfully obvious. you are acting like the ukrainians can just do and handle whatever.....will they with time...sure but its going to take a ton of training and will not be easy. thats all that was being said. quote:What Sonic do you want to meet at? im going to choose to ignore this since you are acting like a female on the rag
Sarcasm baw. This is the OT I thought that the meet me at Sonic would have made that obvious.
quote:
ok cool....and how many abrams m1s has your friend worked on?
I’m not sure but he has participated in training exercises with NATO in 2019 and again in 2021 and had been exposed to the Abrams and says he had been talking with American, British, and Polish tankers picking their brains about western MBTs and tank warfare in general for months.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:16 pm to GOP_Tiger
The Ukraine offensive(s) fail in significantly pushing the Russians out, the military and political repercussions will be interesting to say the least.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:18 pm to lsu777
well if they don't any (ie ZERO) capability, it is a massive intelligence failure and we wasted trillions...
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:19 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Sarcasm baw. This is the OT I thought that the meet me at Sonic would have made that obvious.
quote:
I’m not sure but he has participated in training exercises with NATO in 2019 and again in 2021 and had been exposed to the Abrams and says he had been talking with American, British, and Polish tankers picking their brains about western MBTs and tank warfare in general for months.
i think the plan you laid out in your other thread will prolly work but its going to take time for sure.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:21 pm to TigersnJeeps
quote:
well if they don't any (ie ZERO) capability, it is a massive intelligence failure and we wasted trillions...
A) ussr was king of propganda
B) if you do a deep dive in to cost of maintaining nukes and the current russian budget....they havent been maintaining them to the level needed for decades now
im sure they do have plenty, but most have not been maintained and i get your point about only needing 1.....but putin isnt that stupid. there is no more mad, only assured russian destruction if they even fire one off.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:25 pm to lsu777
The reason that Putin quit even talking about nukes was that China and India indicated that the consequences would likely be a complete and instant economic blockade. The Russian economy would instantly crash, NATO would destroy many Russian military installations with conventional weapons, and Putin would be quickly thrown out a window.
There is absolutely no path where "tactical nukes" help Putin win. So, he almost certainly won't use them.
EDIT: I wish we didn't have to go over this every week.
There is absolutely no path where "tactical nukes" help Putin win. So, he almost certainly won't use them.
EDIT: I wish we didn't have to go over this every week.
This post was edited on 1/25/23 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:28 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
EDIT: I wish we didn't have to go over this every week.
well then how the hell do you see this ending?
saying economic ruin would happen means shite when you are staring down the barrel of death and defeat.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:43 pm to lsu777
quote:
then how the hell do you see this ending?
After Ukraine completes its march to the Sea in May, that puts almost all of Crimea in HIMARS range (certainly in GLSDB range), which imperils the Russian military bases there. Ukraine starts destroying a lot of Russian military capability in Crimea while also simultaneously pushing towards Mariupol with all this NATO equipment. The loss of their supply lines in Crimea means that Ukrainian forces can jump the Dnipro in Kherson and push Russia back into Crimea itself.
All this happens in June, which is also when a new push in the northeast starts, which takes Starobilsk and also "turns the corner and liberates Severodonetsk and Lysychansk.
At this point, in late summer, with his forces in retreat and lots of Russian dead, with the functional loss of his Crimean bases and the impending threat to the cities of Donetsk and Luhansk, with the first deliveries of F-16s, Abrams, and ATACMS beginning to wreak havoc, Putin says that he wants to negotiate.
What does the final deal look like? Who knows? Something like UN-monitored, demilitarized independence for Crimea, with Russians who settled there after 2014 forced to leave. Russia would accept that the full Donbas region would be officially Ukraine, and Ukraine would make the oblasts of Donetsk and Luhansk semi-autonomous, with rights of Russian-speakers officially protected (probably with the understanding that Russian could be an official language in those oblasts for the next 15-20 years).
This is just all my guesses. But you asked what they were.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:51 pm to WeeWee
quote:
When reading your posts it sounds like you are projecting your bias about American technology being the best and American soldiers being the best trained and the Ukrainians have no hope of learning to use it since they did not grow up in the Abrams which is just not true as listed by the solutions listed above that the Ukrainians have devised to overcome the obstacles of operating the Abrams.
I don’t think that’s what he’s doing at all. What he and I both have been doing is giving the perspective of someone who knows a thing or two because we’ve seen a thing or two. He’s never said the Ukrainian tankers can’t learn to fight Western tanks. All we’ve talked x out is what it will take to train them to transition from their Soviet tanks to Western tanks. No one is saying it can’t be done. But along with that, what we are saying is it can’t be rushed.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 12:51 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
After Ukraine completes its march to the Sea in May, that puts almost all of Crimea in HIMARS range (certainly in GLSDB range), which imperils the Russian military bases there. Ukraine starts destroying a lot of Russian military capability in Crimea while also simultaneously pushing towards Mariupol with all this NATO equipment. The loss of their supply lines in Crimea means that Ukrainian forces can jump the Dnipro in Kherson and push Russia back into Crimea itself.
All this happens in June, which is also when a new push in the northeast starts, which takes Starobilsk and also "turns the corner and liberates Severodonetsk and Lysychansk.
At this point, in late summer, with his forces in retreat and lots of Russian dead, with the functional loss of his Crimean bases and the impending threat to the cities of Donetsk and Luhansk, with the first deliveries of F-16s, Abrams, and ATACMS beginning to wreak havoc, Putin says that he wants to negotiate.
I could 100% seeing this, i think it will take longer than summer though
quote:
What does the final deal look like? Who knows? Something like UN-monitored, demilitarized independence for Crimea, with Russians who settled there after 2014 forced to leave. Russia would accept that the full Donbas region would be officially Ukraine, and Ukraine would make the oblasts of Donetsk and Luhansk semi-autonomous, with rights of Russian-speakers officially protected (probably with the understanding that Russian could be an official language in those oblasts for the next 15-20 years).
i could see all of this, i just see putin as a wild card, here is why
1) if the above happens he is either killed or about to be ousted
2) looking at an almost certian loss of power/death....not sure how he will handle it.
quote:
This is just all my guesses. But you asked what they were.
hopefully others chime in too
Posted on 1/25/23 at 1:04 pm to GOP_Tiger
Timing I’m not sure but those outcomes are definitely reasonable.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 1:07 pm to lsu777
quote:
i could see all of this, i just see putin as a wild card, here is why
1) if the above happens he is either killed or about to be ousted
2) looking at an almost certian loss of power/death....not sure how he will handle it.
Putin is the wild card. If GOP’s prediction comes to fruition, that means Russia will be on the ropes by this Summer. What will Putin do if confronted with, not only a battlefield defeat, but the complete loss of Crimea? While I doubt his ability to project significant nuclear power to Europe, much less America, they for sure could hit Ukraine. And while threats from China and India may have kept him in check thus far. Would Putin still think as rationally if he’s faced with the complete collapse of his regime? Or would he, in desperation, grasp at whatever straw he could to stave off the reckoning that would follow?
Posted on 1/25/23 at 1:12 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Putin is the wild card. If GOP’s prediction comes to fruition, that means Russia will be on the ropes by this Summer. What will Putin do if confronted with, not only a battlefield defeat, but the complete loss of Crimea? While I doubt his ability to project significant nuclear power to Europe, much less America, they for sure could hit Ukraine. And while threats from China and India may have kept him in check thus far. Would Putin still think as rationally if he’s faced with the complete collapse of his regime? Or would he, in desperation, grasp at whatever straw he could to stave off the reckoning that would follow?
Posted on 1/25/23 at 1:26 pm to lsu777
quote:
hopefully others chime in too
Nobody knows what will happen under severe threat, but what do we actually know so far? My take is that Putin has used threats to coerce many heads of state out of fear over “what he might do”.
So he gets the familiar Capitulation and concessions, from a policy of appeasement.
But when tasked with actually backing up threats with military action, we have seen his army struggle on the battlefield.
So if the fear of what he might do persists, who’s to say that this conversation stops with Ukraine?
Posted on 1/25/23 at 1:34 pm to Darth_Vader
As they do from time to time, Malcontent News has made is most recent Ukraine Situation Report available free of charge. You can download the pdf HERE.
The Report more than 40 pages long. I'm too busy to read or summarize it now, so you are on your own. Maybe someone with a little more time can post the cliffs.
The Report more than 40 pages long. I'm too busy to read or summarize it now, so you are on your own. Maybe someone with a little more time can post the cliffs.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 1:52 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
"Jesus is going to come back and lead our troops to victory.

Posted on 1/25/23 at 2:06 pm to ned nederlander
so what do yall make of the report of Putin negotiating with the taliban to recognize them in exchange for the US weapons that were left?
no sure i beleive it, but its possible i guess.
quote:
In return, Putin wants US equipment snatched from Afghanistan by the Taliban to be handed over, according to Telegram channel General SVR, which claims to be fed information by a Kremlin insider.
US troops scrambled to withdraw from Afghanistan in August 2021 as the Taliban surged across the war-torn nation in a matter of weeks.
At the same time as seizing regions, militants plundered stocks of Western artillery.
It is thought Taliban fighters may have stolen as many as half a million US weapons and up to 50,000 vehicles.
no sure i beleive it, but its possible i guess.
Posted on 1/25/23 at 2:14 pm to lsu777
quote:
At the same time as seizing regions, militants plundered stocks of Western artillery.
It is thought Taliban fighters may have stolen as many as half a million US weapons and up to 50,000 vehicles.
If we had only known we were leaving Afghanistan...
Posted on 1/25/23 at 2:15 pm to lsu777
quote:
Telegram channel General SVR, which claims to be fed information by a Kremlin insider.
A telegram channel run by an anonymous author quoting another anonymous Kremlin source. No wonder the poli Board is eating this up. Sounds plausible on a surface level.
The Russians can't even perform basic logistics and maintenance on their own outdated Soviet gear, but they are going to have the capability to get all these US systems up and running?
Popular
Back to top


1





