Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 10/6/22 at 3:46 pm to
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28547 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

He had to know that was a non-starter before he ever said it which makes me wonder why he said it.

My completely random guess is that he wants the Russian people to perceive a risk. They have heard their own propagandists advocate for nuclear strikes. No one on the Russian side has spoken up to say, "What if we get blown up too?" This may be an attempt to create nuclear fear in the Russian population.

He knows it is a no go from the get go. This has to be for propaganda value only.
Posted by jfan244888
Soda City, SC
Member since Jul 2021
1134 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 3:50 pm to
I would hope Zelensky is smart enough to know they will never preemptively strike Russia. Its is a defensive pact only.

Statements like this could be way Ukraine is never let in with Article V. It only gives Putin power to say "See they're coming for us!!!! More mobilization!!". Maybe this is his way of trying to stir the pot given the last few weeks but it is not helpful.


Stfu and keep pushing the Russians back until they revolt in Moscow.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14807 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

He had to know that was a non-starter before he ever said it which makes me wonder why he said it.


That’s what I was asking myself…. But what intelligence is he seeing that NATO has passed along? We have heard numerous indirect reports of Russia moving forces that have nuke capabilities. NATO intelligence was spot on in February that an attack was eminent.

Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
26942 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 3:56 pm to
He was poking Putin with a stick there. Of course he knows it won't happen. But now Russia has to spend a few days wondering if this will happen.

Zel is sort of trolling here. He's matching Putin's rhetoric and buying time for his offenses to continue to gather steam.

He isn't saying "Go ahead and nuke Moscow". He's saying NATO should do this to keep Russia from doing this.

Zelenskyy knows that he is locked into a one on one duel with Putin here. He's matched Putin's statements with a vague comment that will get Russia... and quite a few folks over here... the vapors.

"Maybe NATO should bomb the crap out of you in Ukraine. Just to show you they are serious." He knows it will not happen, though I am sure he would be thrilled if it did, he's just poking Putin with a stick.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5645 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 4:20 pm to
Zelensky's staff forced to clarify statement after president suggests 'preemptive strike' on Russia.

President Volodymyr Zelensky said the West should have carried out "preemptive strikes, so that (Russians) know what will happen to them if they use it," referring to nuclear weapons. Serhii Nykyforov, Zelensky's spokesperson, explained that the president was referring to preventive sanctions that were to be applied before Russia's full-scale invasion and assured that Ukraine would never call for the use of nuclear weapons.

LINK
Posted by BrianKellyRespecter
Member since Aug 2022
534 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 4:21 pm to
It’s happening
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Zelensky's staff forced to clarify statement after president suggests 'preemptive strike' on Russia.


I think he meant what he said, but I appreciate the walk-back.

This week has been successful. No need to let gaffs like this undermine the success.
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 4:25 pm
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8163 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 4:30 pm to
Do you ever look back in the thread before you post?
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15666 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

President Volodymyr Zelensky said the West should have carried out "preemptive strikes, so that (Russians) know what will happen to them if they use it," referring to nuclear weapons. Serhii Nykyforov, Zelensky's spokesperson, explained that the president was referring to preventive sanctions that were to be applied before Russia's full-scale invasion and assured that Ukraine would never call for the use of nuclear weapons.


The cyber attack capabilities of the USA have never even partially been unleashed. Russia would being crippled for almost forever and be split up between other nations and warring mafioso types within Russia if this ever happened.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15666 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 4:42 pm to
It isn't happening but many think that staging to do it is happening
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5645 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 5:06 pm to
More context and full quote ...


Zelenskyy calls for preventative pressure on Russia due to its nuclear threats: cue hysteria in Russia
Thursday, 6 October 2022, 21:48

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, has called upon NATO to respond to Russia’s nuclear threats by applying preventative pressure. Russia has perceived this statement as a call for a preemptive strike on Russia.

Source: Zelenskyy, during a discussion at the Lowy Institute, Australia, which he attended via video link; Dmitry Peskov, press secretary of the President of Russia; Maria Zakharova, representative of Russia’s Ministry for Foreign Affairs; Serhii Nykyforov, spokesperson for Zelenskyy, on Facebook

Quote from Zelenskyy in response to a question about what NATO should do to prevent Russia from using nuclear weapons:

"We can already see that these people [the Russians – ed.] are capable of such atrocities. What must NATO do? Make it impossible for Russia to use nuclear weapons. But what is [even more] important, I am once again turning to the international community as I did before 24 February. Preventative strikes, so that they know what will await them if they use [a nuclear weapon]. Not the other way round – wait for Russian nuclear strikes and then say afterwards, ‘Oh, it’s like that, is it? Well, take this from us!’

Reconsider applying pressure - that’s what NATO should do, and reconsider the order in which it is applied."

Ukrainska Pravda
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8163 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 5:14 pm to
In Context, the quote makes more sense. The media evidently only wants to sell clicks is going to ignore the intended interpretation and go with the literal interpretation with no context.
This post was edited on 10/6/22 at 5:16 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150127 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

It's quite possibly the dumbest thing anyone has ever proposed.
the guy is in a life and death struggle for his literal life and the existence of his country

Hes obviously going to push for everything. He doesnt care about WW3. Hes in it right now

Idk why people are losing their minds over this. Just because he said he wants it, doesnt mean its going to happen. Nor does it make him some insane and ungrateful prick
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

1.) What is the most likely end scenario in this conflict?


For most of March, I thought that there would be a quick settlement. Putin had failed to take Kyiv and the ineptness of Russian military had been exposed, while Zelensky had a huge incentive to make a deal to get Russian troops off their soil. So, I thought something was reasonable that involved Ukrainian recognition of Russian control of Crimea and some kind of federal status for Donetsk and Luhansk.

But Putin thought he was stronger than he was and refused the deals that were on the table. And after Bucha, any such deal became impossible. Ukraine could never sacrifice any of its citizens to permanent occupation by such barbarians.

So, I think there no scenario where Ukraine is going to quit fighting with Russian control over the Donbas, and I fight it very hard to imagine Ukraine giving up Crimea.

So, if I have to guess, I think that Russia ends up giving up all claim and removing all troops, and I do think that there's an agreement that gives Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk some kind of self-governing federal status as part of Ukraine. That might mean, for example, that Russian could continue to be an official language in those areas -- something like that.

quote:

2.) Will Europe have a major energy crisis this winter?


Really depends on who you talk to. I think not, but I'm not sure. People have motives to exaggerate this on both sides.

quote:

3.) Is either side gaining momentum in the fight currently?


Ukraine is on the cusp of an extraordinary victory in retaking the city of Kherson. That's going to be cataclysmic event in Russian politics -- when you might see a coup or civil war or provinces declare independence or something else destabilizing.

Every week, Ukraine gets even more modern NATO equipment -- stuff that's significantly better than Russian equipment, though Russian incompetence has meant that Ukraine has gained hundreds of Russian tanks and other equipment. But Russia has been reduced to pulling tanks out of storage that were last updated in 1975, and Ukraine captured at least 10 of those T-62 tanks this past week.

Ukraine is already much stronger than Russia, and the disparity grows every day.

quote:

1.) How likely is it that NATO is drawn into the conflict thru formal means?


I put the odds of Putin using a nuclear weapon at something like 10%. It would be a dumb move, but desperate dictators sometimes make really dumb decisions.

Use of a nuclear weapon would likely provoke a direct NATO response. But I don't think that Russia would be able to fight back against NATO and in any non-nuclear war.

quote:

2.) What is general expectation of how long it will be until a resolution to the conflict is reached?


I don't think that Russia can hold on to Kherson for more than a few weeks, and Ukraine is also going to retake the north of Luhansk Oblast soon.

When that happens, it's going to cause a political crisis in Russia. The Russian will simply not be able to tolerate losing a war on this scale. The crash in the economy, the disconnection from the rest of the world and the hatred of most of it, the tens of thousands of lives lost, and even the tens of thousands of injured lives ... all of that is lot to give up for the glory of winning a war, and it is way, way too much for a losing war.

So, the resolution of the war depends on the resolution of the future Russian political collapse. There are three real power factions in play:

1) The Russian military
2) The FSB (successor to the KGB), and
3) The other siloviki, including Kadryov and Prigozhin

How does Russia's internal conflict between these groups (and, possibly, breakaway republics) end? That's completely unpredictable.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24848 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:07 pm to
Pure political post.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
13133 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:07 pm to
Great post.
Posted by TexasTiger33
United States of America
Member since Feb 2022
16128 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

GOP_Tiger


many thanks
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
20967 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Pure political post.



Wars are fought for political goals. And I'm convinced that Russia's internal politics will shape the end of the war, because I don't think that Ukraine is going to have the opportunity to truly finish off the Russian army before Russia goes into internal chaos. You can already see different forces positioning themselves to assert power in the coming internal strife.
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8163 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 6:54 pm to
Excellent response
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97936 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

WestCoastAg


Knighting for a guy calling for Nuke War

This thread has gotten to peak levels of awesome
first pageprev pagePage 1898 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram