- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 6/13/22 at 4:19 pm to lsu777
Posted on 6/13/22 at 4:19 pm to lsu777
quote:
just for the record, i do agree with the way things have been handled in ukraine. its the one thing i do feel the admin has done half arse right.
Half assed is correct. USA and European natios held their finger up to see which way public perception wind was blowing before they actually promised anything substantive
Posted on 6/13/22 at 4:27 pm to LSUPilot07
He/she is a palmetto bug aka large cockroach
Posted on 6/13/22 at 4:29 pm to WeeWee
Isn't $40 billion a lot less than if we were directly involved? Sure seems that way to me.
Posted on 6/13/22 at 4:33 pm to CitizenK
It might be a push, but this way we keep all of our best equipment and personnel safe.
Posted on 6/13/22 at 5:03 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Starting to see posts on the twatter that Ukrainian forces have advanced to within 10 km of Kherson. Can’t confirm anything yet, but the rumors of the Russians fleeing from Kharkiv and the Ukrainian counterattack in Severodonetsk started the same way. However, they are also twatter rumors so take with large grain of salt.
I appreciate the information but almost every article I've seen today talks about Russia in strong control and things getting bleaker for Ukraine. Why is there such a discrepancy between you and other media ( including liberal media)?
Posted on 6/13/22 at 5:12 pm to SOSFAN
Fog of war for the most part.
I've found that it is best to wait a few days before declaring anything for certain at this point.
We have heard that Ukraine is collapsing in the Severodonetsk pocket for weeks now...hasn't happened yet.
Twitter is a great source for breaking info and there are a lot of good sources on it. Some of them have a Russian bias, some are Ukraine biased and some are fairly neutral. I try to check them all before forming an opinion.
I've found that it is best to wait a few days before declaring anything for certain at this point.
We have heard that Ukraine is collapsing in the Severodonetsk pocket for weeks now...hasn't happened yet.
Twitter is a great source for breaking info and there are a lot of good sources on it. Some of them have a Russian bias, some are Ukraine biased and some are fairly neutral. I try to check them all before forming an opinion.
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 6/13/22 at 5:41 pm to Chromdome35
ISW likewise, usually at least 24 hrs late
Posted on 6/13/22 at 5:52 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Isn't $40 billion a lot less than if we were directly involved? Sure seems that way to me.
Probably but are there really only 2 options???
Also it’s $54 billion in aid approved through May due to Russia and Ukraine conflict. The $40 billion was the May aid package ($33 Billion requested by administration plus $7 Billion just added on top by the House), but some is going to NATO countries on the border including some where we have troops and to help refugees.
Depending on how aid to Ukraine is calculated (direct or indirect) we are probably contributing 1.5 to over 2 times more than combined total from the rest of the world so far.
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 6/13/22 at 6:14 pm to dallastigers
Approved and spent are two different things
Posted on 6/13/22 at 6:17 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
Twitter is a great source for breaking info
Sheesh now I understand why the discrepancies.
Posted on 6/13/22 at 6:21 pm to Chromdome35
LINK
The link is to CNN not a right wing publication
quote:
What we're covering
Russian forces are now in control of most of Severodonetsk, the epicenter of the bloody battle for Ukraine's eastern Donbas region, but Ukrainian lines to the city do not yet appear to be totally cut. Russian armed forces have destroyed the second of three bridges between the twin cities of Severodonetsk and Lysychansk.
The link is to CNN not a right wing publication
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 6/13/22 at 6:48 pm to RLDSC FAN
Fierce urban combat continues in Sievierodonetsk – the Ministry of Defense
The invaders are suffering heavy losses in the infantry units of Rosgvardiya and the Russian Armed Forces. They are advancing only thanks to their assault aircraft. The enemy is also actively using artillery and MLRS.
“Ukraine’s Armed Forces are holding off the Russian offensive trying to surround our troops in Sievierodonetsk and Lysychansk and block logistics routes from Bakhmut,” Motuzianyk said.
In the Sloviansk direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces successfully held off the enemy’s offensive near the villages of Dolyna and Bohorodychne.
more detailed maps within...
Defense industry of Ukraine
The invaders are suffering heavy losses in the infantry units of Rosgvardiya and the Russian Armed Forces. They are advancing only thanks to their assault aircraft. The enemy is also actively using artillery and MLRS.
“Ukraine’s Armed Forces are holding off the Russian offensive trying to surround our troops in Sievierodonetsk and Lysychansk and block logistics routes from Bakhmut,” Motuzianyk said.
In the Sloviansk direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces successfully held off the enemy’s offensive near the villages of Dolyna and Bohorodychne.
more detailed maps within...
Defense industry of Ukraine
Posted on 6/13/22 at 6:49 pm to WeeWee
Posted on 6/13/22 at 7:20 pm to CitizenK
quote:
Approved and spent are two different things
So when you stated “Isn't $40 billion a lot less than if we were directly involved? Sure seems that way to me.” Was the $40 billion you stated approved or actually spent??? Or did that not matter then…
For US that amount is only to last until or through September. Don’t know about the rest of the world’s timeframes.
I think that what what rest of world has pledged or approved is also different from spent as well until more time passes. They may have actually spent less of % of pledged than US.
We are 1.5 to a little over 2 times more than combined total of rest of the globe. If you include aid not directly going to Ukraine but to surrounding NATO countries and Ukrainian refugees because of conflict it may be higher.
Unless you believe Ukraine is already a lost cause or will be before May bill spent sometime in September approved versus spent is just arguing semantics.
Just based on Kiel Institute
quote:
The U.S. has pledged far more aid to Ukraine than any other country in the world — even before Biden passed a $40 billion aid bill…
The U.S. has pledged far more aid to Ukraine than any one country has since Russia’s invasion began earlier this year, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Between Jan. 24 and May 10, the U.S. pledged about $42.95 billion (the equivalent of 40 billion euros) while all other countries pledged a combined $25.3 billion (23.6 billion euros), the Kiel Institute explained in a working paper.
…Although President Joe Biden didn’t sign the Additional Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act into law until May 21, the Kiel Institute included the aid bill in its calculations under the assumption it would become law. The law provides for $40.1 billion in aid “for activities to respond to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.” The Kiel Institute estimated about $23.11 billion of that $40.1 billion will go directly to Ukraine — the rest of that sum will help support American troops in the region, refugees outside of Ukraine and neighboring countries.
https://www.krem.com/article/news/verify/world-verify/ukraine-verify/us-has-pledged-most-aid-to-ukraine-of-any-country-in-world/
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 6/13/22 at 7:34 pm to Chromdome35
The U.S. military is exceptional in many areas. However, the one area in which it is the absolute master is logistics and supply. It really began in the latter years of the Civil War and was perfected in WW2, both in Europe and especially the Pacific. The logistics and supply arm of the US Navy and US Army in the Vietnam War was nothing short of amazing. There are many variables when it comes to US military strategy and tactics, but running out of stuff and/or not getting it to where it needs to be aren’t likely.
Posted on 6/13/22 at 7:47 pm to beachdude
quote:
However, the one area in which it is the absolute master is logistics and supply.
Truth. On the other hand, the Germans were not good at logistics in WWII. You might say they were bad.
Posted on 6/13/22 at 7:59 pm to jeffsdad
quote:
Another 5 pages of crap and not the war. Idiots. This is not the political board.
This post was edited on 6/13/22 at 8:03 pm
Posted on 6/13/22 at 8:01 pm to dallastigers
Is everything promised already there?
Posted on 6/13/22 at 8:02 pm to cypher
quote:
The invaders are suffering heavy losses in the infantry units of Rosgvardiya and the Russian Armed Forces
We don't have a good analog for Rosvgardia in this country but they're sort of a more heavily armed version of the French gendarmerie. They're not frontline assault troops and if Russia is using them that way it points to how critical their manpower shortage is.
Popular
Back to top


0



