- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:42 pm to chalmetteowl
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:42 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
well he was man enough to kill two people that night…
c'mon man....he was man enough to defend himself
0
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:42 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
well he was man enough to kill two people that night…
Hero's work right there, I'm sure you're just as happy as I am that the world is a better place now
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:43 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
well he was man enough to kill two people that night…
You might feel differently if your business, your home, your family were under threat from violent riots while the police stood down
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:43 pm to Prominentwon
quote:
But don’t sit here and point the finger of blame at people that want to be center.
No, he's right.
I know it's a hard message to hear. But, people in the middle are VERY much to blame. There is no middle when it comes to right and wrong...true and untrue. People can disagree on what is good. But, that's not what we are dealing with.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:46 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
well he was man enough to kill two people that night…
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:46 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
well he was man enough to kill two people that night…
After they attacked him. He didn’t go looking for a fight, but he sure as frick ended one.
He should be lionized for doing what our paid public defenders were ordered (and obeyed said order) to not do.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:47 pm to moneyg
quote:
Kid put himself at risk to stand up for and protect businesses from being destroyed by angry mobs. That's more than you've ever done in your life
If he was standing between a looter and a store with a gun, he’d have no legal authority to discharge his firearm to stop them from robbing said store. The fact is he killed someone in the only manner of which he had any legal authority to do and will be found not-guilty for such. Rightfully.
But no part of why he went there with a weapon was something he was legally authorized to do, and as a 17 year old he had no idea what he was doing, was allowed to do and the only shittier person in this case than Kyle Rittenhouse is the 2 people that brought him into this world. And the two cops he walked by with an AR that didn’t even take a second thought to his presence.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:48 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:you misspelled taking out the human garbage
well he was man enough to kill two people that night…
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:49 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:If this were true, he could not be tried.
as a 17 year old he had no idea what he was doing
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:50 pm to redandright
Wow. So I just saw the clip of the prosecutor trying to just Rittenhouse’s right to remain silent against him.
I’ve never seen that before
Wtf
I’ve never seen that before
Wtf
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:51 pm to SPEEDY
Wait what?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:51 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:While I don’t agree with it as a wise strategy, demonstrating or showing one has the means of force as a deterrent to protect property can be legally accomplished without using deadly force.
But no part of why he went there with a weapon was something he was legally authorized to do
It’s the same argument the prosecutor was trying to make that the judge cut off.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:52 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:can you explain?
If this were true, he could not be tried.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:54 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Oh Lord. If he's using hollow points, they'd hold that against him too
If he didn't shoot them, he'd be dead.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:54 pm to BROpaneTANK
quote:
he only shittier person in this case than Kyle Rittenhouse is the 2 people that brought him into this world
God bless those two for giving this country a patriot with balls
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:55 pm to WDE24
quote:
While I don’t agree with it as a wise strategy, demonstrating or showing one has the means of force as a deterrent to protect property can be legally accomplished without using deadly force. It’s the same argument the prosecutor was trying to make that the judge cut off
Yeah, when it’s your property. I can’t shoot my gun at someone to stop them from entering property I don’t own and wasn’t asked to defend. So by holding a gun to them only acts as an unauthorized threat to someone’s life.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:56 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Wow. So I just saw the clip of the prosecutor trying to just Rittenhouse’s right to remain silent against him.
It’s almost like they want a mistrial. I thought the judge was going to have a stroke.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:56 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:was that business insured?
You might feel differently if your business, your home, your family were under threat from violent riots while the police stood down
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:57 pm to BROpaneTANK
But he was asked to defend the car lot AND he didn’t shoot them defending the lot. He shot them after running away and having to defend himself.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 12:57 pm to chalmetteowl
Insurance doesn’t stop fire from destroying everything you worked for.
Page 17 of 115
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News