- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kevin Federline claims $20K isn't enough, wants more child support from Britney Spears
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:52 pm to AUCE05
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:52 pm to AUCE05
quote:
30s have not been kind to Brit.
She made $34 million last year and looks better than vast majority of mid-30s mothers. I'd say she is doing just fine in her 30s.
Most 36 year olds with kids don't look like this in a bikini:
0
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:53 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Correct. In those cases, it would be completely ridiculous to say she should only get the benefits of necessity in divorce
Why are you guys even arguing this? Kfed didn't stay at home, quite the opposite. Kfed did the absolute best with his talents he could have by working as a dancer for Spears. He basically tapped his income fully with her. She not only did not limit his income, she enhanced it.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:54 pm to baldona
quote:Follow the thread. It isnt hard
Why are you guys even arguing this?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:55 pm to shel311
quote:
You're missing the "at her level" part of the equation.
I acknowledge that there will be some consideration given to equalizing living conditions of the children, but there are limits on that and at $20k/month I think those limits are starting to be tested.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:55 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Im just going by the law, baw
I think he just asked you what the law was.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:55 pm to lsupride87
I mean I get that. Just don't think it's smart to be so dependent on one spouses income like in that example. At least have the backup plan like if the husband loses his job.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:57 pm to TH03
quote:That is a completely different discussion
t least have the backup plan like if the husband loses his job.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:58 pm to lsupride87
I know. I'm just saying I wouldn't feel bad for the girl. Or guy if it were the opposite situation.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 1:59 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Its very easy to say with a straight face because it is absolutely true
you don't believe what you are actually saying though.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Wife is now supposed to have to live simply a conformable life?
She'll get spousal support for 3-5 years. During that time she better get her shite together.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:01 pm to TechDawg2007
Leave Brit Brit alone
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:02 pm to TH03
quote:Why not?
I know. I'm just saying I wouldn't feel bad for the girl. Or guy if it were the opposite situation.
That's a pretty ridiculous statement
A woman or man gives up their career to raise a family as part of a team ,and then through divorce is screwed by this
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:06 pm to DavidTheGnome
Because that’s the law for when a rich man divorces a woman who doesn’t have money. Equality is a bitch huh
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:07 pm to TH03
quote:
I'd say the worst part is having to pay it in the first place.
Tou-muthafrickin-che'.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:10 pm to TechDawg2007
I'm usually against this sort of crap, but with so many great men being destroyed by gold digging bitches, lets give at least one to our team for once. I'm rooting this deadbeat dad on.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:11 pm to teke184
quote:
I’ll call a spade a spade and say that this is an entirely stupid case. I put this on par with Michael Strahan’s divorce where his ex wanted an insane amount because she loved to dress up his twin girls in Prada regularly. As toddlers. Child support should be about the care and maintenance of the children, not equalizing the home environments by docking the breadwinner to support the leach, regardless of genders involved.
Teke,
You are 100% right. But if these sexes were reversed there would be a huge outcry about a scumbag dad not supporting his ex and their children. This is just equality coming home to roost
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:12 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
This is just equality coming home to roost
Which is why we should use the example to point out the absurdity of it, not as a vindictive victory for 'the team'.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:21 pm to HempHead
Absolutely agree.
But there is a social circle of women whom have never ever had a job and literally live off divorce filings. For frick’s sake there are tv series, not single shows or documentaries but full blown fricking series, about them.
I recently read an article about rich and powerful bread winning women in New York being taken to the cleaners by their husbands through divorce as the social stigma of not being the male provider declines. These rich and powerful women are flabbergasted and blindsided about how expensive divorcing a stay at home spouse or lesser earning can be with all of the punitive laws in Place.
Civil laws should not be vindictive or punitive, but divorce lawyers have made them so and for the past 30 years women have been bending men over a barrel.
Hopefully men and women alike will look at cases like this and realize the insanity of it all.
tl:dr - This is what men are used to. Change the laws back to common sense and end the absurdity
But there is a social circle of women whom have never ever had a job and literally live off divorce filings. For frick’s sake there are tv series, not single shows or documentaries but full blown fricking series, about them.
I recently read an article about rich and powerful bread winning women in New York being taken to the cleaners by their husbands through divorce as the social stigma of not being the male provider declines. These rich and powerful women are flabbergasted and blindsided about how expensive divorcing a stay at home spouse or lesser earning can be with all of the punitive laws in Place.
Civil laws should not be vindictive or punitive, but divorce lawyers have made them so and for the past 30 years women have been bending men over a barrel.
Hopefully men and women alike will look at cases like this and realize the insanity of it all.
tl:dr - This is what men are used to. Change the laws back to common sense and end the absurdity
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:44 pm to TechDawg2007
This is why big time pop stars shouldn't get themselves pregnant by trashy douchebag backup dancers. I would've taken half that amount for child support if she'd given me the chance to knock her up.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:48 pm to lsupride87
quote:
20k a month is ridiculously low in this case according to the law
No way does 20k a month provide the kids an equal living situation in both homes
What's good for the goose is good for the gander, your honor!
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News