- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kevin Federline claims $20K isn't enough, wants more child support from Britney Spears
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:48 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:48 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Why not?
Beside the fact that getting divorced after having kids is trashy?
If the husband is making millions, there's no excuse to just hire a nanny and continue your medical career in the event something should happen to the husband or job. Being overly reliant on one parent's income means the other one is fricked if something happens.
2
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:51 pm to TH03
quote:No excuse?
there's no excuse to just hire a nanny and continue your medical career in the event something should happen to the husband or job
What if your "excuse" is the wife and husband want one of the actual parents to raise the kid and not a nanny?
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:52 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Follow the thread. It isnt hard
You are arguing over 2 wealthy successful people divorcing in a thread about a back up dancer and a successful wealthy entertainer. I'm saying your argument had absolutely nothing to do with the current thread, completely different in fact.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:54 pm to baldona
quote:Follow the thread, it still isn't hard
You are arguing over 2 wealthy successful people divorcing in a thread about a back up dancer and a successful wealthy entertainer. I'm saying your argument had absolutely nothing to do with the current thread, completely different in fact.
I responded to the notion the law should be entirely changed based on this situation, and others like it.....
So i presented a situation in which the current law makes sense
This post was edited on 3/20/18 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:56 pm to TH03
quote:You can argue he'd never have been able to "build that" annual salary without the wife's sacrifice of a job to take care of the kids and all of that other stuff so the husband could focus more on the job. That could be, and often is, a joint decision in a marriage.
In the words of Obama, you didn't build that.
He makes millions and they can afford child care. She chose to skip med school.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 2:59 pm to CP3LSU25
quote:Why is this dude so insistent on arguing something that is a fact?
you don't believe what you are actually saying though.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 3:02 pm to lsupride87
Exactly... one of the few times I've ever heard someone argue that parents should have less involvement in their kids lives.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 3:03 pm to TH03
quote:No excuse, ya know, other than wanting to raise your own kid.
there's no excuse to just hire a nanny and continue your medical career in the event something should happen to the husband or job.
quote:Or they just get child support or alimony or whatever the hell it's called.
Being overly reliant on one parent's income means the other one is fricked if something happens.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 3:04 pm to lsupride87
quote:
What if your "excuse" is the wife and husband want one of the actual parents to raise the kid and not a nanny?
Plan your children better.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 3:08 pm to TH03
quote:Did someone hack your account today?
Plan your children better.
Posted on 3/20/18 at 3:48 pm to lsupride87
gold digging chics use this to their advantage. More power to him. Even if he is a dirtbag.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News