re: Kate Steinle's, killed by an illegal immigrant in SF, murderer found not guilty

quote:

---

Someone should pay a bunch of homeless people to just show up in these SJW's houses one day. Break into their houses and just hang out there. And demand that the SJW pay for all their food and health care and provide them with some spending money. Further, the SJW has to legally adopt the homeless person as a full and equal member of its family.

---

Here's a great video. People protesting Trump's "Muslim ban" but won't take in the very refugees that they claim to be standing up for. They're all clueless idealists that don't live in reality and never put their money where their privileged mouths are.

LINK

It may be your favorite analogy but still isn't an intelligent analogy.

quote:

---

It may be your favorite analogy but still isn't an intelligent analogy.

---

Why not? Care to explain and discuss it or you just wanted to drop your stupid comment off and run?

quote:

---

A huge part of the plan to bring down the USA is to inundate it with illegal immigrants. The Democratic Party IS the communist party. It’s a fact. They are anti American.

---

The modern leftists are so hellbent for leather to diametrically opposing ANYTHING the right trots out, good or bad, that they are literally willing to sacrifice America for it.

I've always thought/said that if I were an enemy of the USA, the best way to beat us is to encourage us to tear ourselves apart with our own foolishness. Why try to heat us militarily when all you have to do is wait a couple generations for us to keep acting a fool and jeopardizing our own standing in the world, naively thinking there will be no consequences?

You don't even have to be a conspiracy theorist to see the logic in that.

quote:

---

may be your favorite analogy but still isn't an intelligent analogy.

---

Unpack this shite or get the frick out, pendejo.

One of the more pathetic thing of this travesty was one of the scumbag public defender said the president, VP and AG were all under investigation and shouldn’t comment on the verdict because because they will have to rely on the presumption of innocence. This frick is a public employee and was talking shite to the leader of the free world. fricking San Francisco is a pathetic place. I wish California was leave the US.

quote:

---

fricking San Fran jury,

---

I covered this on the Poli Board, but if you want to get technical this seems like it was an idiotic prosecutors fault.

The jury was to decide between Murder 1 and involuntary manslaughter.

California (no surprise here) has some bizarrely fricked up laws.

The following quote is not my opinion, it is from California Code and Findlaw:

quote:

---

quote:
In California, Homicide during the commission of a felony often results in a murder charge rather than a manslaughter charge. Murder 1 requires intent and malice.

When a killing occurred during the commission of a crime that is not a felony, the prosecutor must prove that the defendant had a criminal intent to commit the underlying unlawful act. If the defendant did not intend to engage in the crime that resulted in homicide, the state may be unable to prove involuntary manslaughter. The defendant may be able to establish a lack of intent by showing a reasonable mistake or lack of knowledge.

---

if my understanding of the law in California is correct, and the Prosecutor chose to give the jury murder 1 or involuntary manslaughter then that prosecutor is a fricking retard and deserves all of the hatred and blame, and I wouldn't bat an eye if he dies. He basically picked two charges that require intent for a case that had a defendant with an easily provable lack of intent.

The problem is murder 1 requires malice and intent. A good defense attorney can get him out of murder 1. Involuntary manslaughter in California can be taken off the table if the defendant can show "a lack of knowledge or reasonable mistake" however I find it unbelievable that that stupid fricking jury all agreed that firing a gun into a crowded pier is a reasonable mistake or you lack the knowledge that firing a gun into a crowd can kill someone.

Over the wall with him

In a body bag

quote:

---

however I find it unbelievable that that stupid fricking jury all agreed that firing a gun into a crowded pier is a reasonable mistake or you lack the knowledge that firing a gun into a crowd can kill someone.

---

There was a "firearm expert" that supposedly came in and said the weapon had an extremely light trigger and was prone to going off practically by itself.

It was a Sig P239 which is SA/DA. Unless the hammer was cocked there's absolutely no way that's possible. Even the SA pull weight specs are 4.5 lbs. That's not a "hair trigger".