- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:21 am to AlxTgr
It's not our of bounds, it's just that the defense wanted to question the witness about the report, but it wasn't his report.
They can call Paul if they want.
They can call Paul if they want.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:21 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
Why is Aunt Bev in the tank for the CW so much?
It's unknown
It is very much known, She is a very close friend of the Alberts, thus the Auntie Bev.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:25 am to winkchance
Feels like the Judge has sustained more objections in the 20 minutes of the defense’s first witness than she did the entirety of the state’s case
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:27 am to winkchance
quote:
It is very much known, She is a very close friend of the Alberts, thus the Auntie Bev.
I've never seen evidence of anything like that.
Her brother represented Kevin Albert in a self defense case about 30 years ago. That's the only connection I've ever seen.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:29 am to KosmoCramer
quote:I don't think you are addressing the issue. The data came from the report. We all know they can call him, so you can stop posting that.
It's not our of bounds, it's just that the defense wanted to question the witness about the report, but it wasn't his report.
They can call Paul if they want.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:56 am to AlxTgr
They wanted to ask questions about the report and likely conclusions made by Paul through Welcher. The judge deemed it not probative enough to be asked about through a 3rd party.
Not sure why you're being so hostile
Not sure why you're being so hostile
Posted on 5/30/25 at 10:10 am to KosmoCramer
quote:I meant zero hostility. Just pointing out that, IMHO, you were addressing things that were not asked.
Not sure why you're being so hostile
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:27 am to AlxTgr
Once again Brennan proves himself to be a slimy POS.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 11:38 am to civiltiger07
quote:It's amazing some lawyers don't get this part. The last jury trial I had, I watched a poor plaintiff get zero from the jury simply because the jury hated his lawyer. Hell, my client's $50K had been offered for 3 years. Zero.
Once again Brennan proves himself to be a slimy POS.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 12:59 pm to AlxTgr
It's interesting that he's a defense attorney brought in as a special prosecutor. I wouldn't hire him. I'm not sure of his litigation style or his hideous accent.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:23 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
quote:
It is very much known, She is a very close friend of the Alberts, thus the Auntie Bev.
I've never seen evidence of anything like that.
Her brother represented Kevin Albert in a self defense case about 30 years ago. That's the only connection I've ever seen.
You are referring to Sean McCabe, who himself is on record in several text conversations calling her Auntie Bev. Sean McCabe is Jenn McCabe's brother in law and good friends with Brian Albert and Bran Higgins.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:31 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:I can't not focus on it.
his hideous accent
Posted on 5/30/25 at 1:37 pm to winkchance
quote:
You are referring to Sean McCabe, who himself is on record in several text conversations calling her Auntie Bev. Sean McCabe is Jenn McCabe's brother in law and good friends with Brian Albert and Bran Higgins.
No, that's not was a referring to. In 1994, Chris Albert was represented by John Prescott, the brother of Judge Beverly Cannone, in a manslaughter trial.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 2:09 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
It's interesting that he's a defense attorney brought in as a special prosecutor.
It’s almost he is the defense attorney for the Commonwealth.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 2:25 pm to civiltiger07
Like every other lawyer on planet Earth.
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 2:42 pm to MBclass83
quote:
Like every other layer on planet Earth.
Based on some of your other comments I don’t take your post seriously.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 3:00 pm to BrewDrees95
quote:I'll say again, this does not necessarily mean that there is a bias. It "could" mean that the defense is pushing the boundaries more than the state which, if were the case here, the sustains would fall more in the state's favor.
Feels like the Judge has sustained more objections in the 20 minutes of the defense’s first witness than she did the entirety of the state’s case
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 5/30/25 at 3:42 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
Several attorneys streaming and covering this case are stumped about why many of the objections have been sustained.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 6:12 pm to LSUGrrrl
I think much of the objections were based on leading questions. This is Jackson's first witness where he can't. Some were also based on foundation issues.
Much I saw from today was eventually allowed once the question was rephrased or foundation laid.
Much I saw from today was eventually allowed once the question was rephrased or foundation laid.
Page 94 of 160
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News