- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 5/29/25 at 10:27 am to AlxTgr
Posted on 5/29/25 at 10:27 am to AlxTgr
Hank rested without all the "facts, science, and data" to show beyond a reasonable doubt that KR hit JOK.
Hank is a lying liar who lies.
Grant the motion to dismiss Bev! Do it!
Hank is a lying liar who lies.
Grant the motion to dismiss Bev! Do it!
0
Posted on 5/29/25 at 10:29 am to AlxTgr
Jen McCabe looking out the window twice in 15 minutes would have heard this collision or noticed something different. She heard and saw nothing.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:06 am to MBclass83
quote:
The only way 2 people can keep a secret is if one of them is dead .
Or if the investigators were brought in on the conspiracy, and coached their statements.
There's more evidence of that than there is that Karen murdered someone
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:14 am to No Colors
The CW played a clip of KR sayin she thought she may have hit him then rested.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:26 am to AlxTgr
Is court done for the day?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:28 am to ILurkThereforeIAm
Yes, they resume at 9:30 tomorrow.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 11:30 am to AlxTgr
quote:
The CW played a clip of KR sayin she thought she may have hit him then rested.
I still can’t believe they let her do those interviews.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 12:08 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
The CW played a clip of KR sayin she thought she may have hit him then rested.
I thought the actual quote was, "Could I have hit him?"
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:03 pm to winkchance
"Did he come and hit the back of my car and I hit him in the knee and he's drunk and passed out?"
"And when I hired David Yanetti I asked him those questions the night of January 29th. David, what if I ran his foot over or what if I clipped him in the knee? And David said, yeah then you have some element of culpability."
"And when I hired David Yanetti I asked him those questions the night of January 29th. David, what if I ran his foot over or what if I clipped him in the knee? And David said, yeah then you have some element of culpability."
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:05 pm to LSBoosie
What Ifs aren’t a confession. I like that this jury is much younger than the first jury.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:09 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
I still can’t believe they let her do those interviews.
Agreed but she was merely going over all possibilities and her hitting him was one of those possibilities. I think Brennan used it for max effect but isn't earth shattering.
AJ will dispel it by saying "see how concerned my client was? She even included herself in the list of possibilities yet the CW has been unable to prove anything"
Posted on 5/29/25 at 1:22 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
What Ifs aren’t a confession. I like that this jury is much younger than the first jury.
I never said they were. But publicly admitting that you thought you could have hit him, then saying after you talked to your attorney and he told you that if you did you would be culpable, then that's when you knew for sure that you didn't hit him, it's a bad look.
I still think there's too much reasonable doubt to convict, but those clips could end up screwing her.
This post was edited on 5/29/25 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 5/29/25 at 3:35 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
I still think there's too much reasonable doubt to convict
This trail is - Reasonable Doubt 101. There's just no possible way a jury can unanimously convict her of murder. It's like there is a neon sign blinking "reasonable doubt" in this courtroom.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 6:53 pm to sosaysmorvant
Defense can hammer them in close about who the state did not call
Posted on 5/30/25 at 7:02 am to BrewDrees95
Why is Aunt Bev in the tank for the CW so much? With her not allowing key cycle evidence tied to Trooper Paul which Judas Welcher brought up, it doesn't allow the defense to present it, yet the CW is who entered it into evidence in the first place (odometer reading).
This gal's take is agreeable to me (and she's kinda cute)
Watch the 1st 4 mins
This gal's take is agreeable to me (and she's kinda cute)
Watch the 1st 4 mins
Posted on 5/30/25 at 8:18 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Why is Aunt Bev in the tank for the CW so much?
It's unknown. She worked as a public defender for 24 years.
quote:
With her not allowing key cycle evidence tied to Trooper Paul which Judas Welcher brought up, it doesn't allow the defense to present it, yet the CW is who entered it into evidence in the first place (odometer reading).
The defense can call Proctor and get everything in that way. And I really don't see the downside of calling him.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 8:20 am to KosmoCramer
I think it's a foregone conclusion that Proctor will be called. There is bias all over this case and he's going to have to read his own words......in front of the jury 
Posted on 5/30/25 at 8:48 am to idlewatcher
The lead investigator has to take the stand. It would be really odd to not hear from the lead investigator.
Posted on 5/30/25 at 8:51 am to Veritas
I would title him "former lead investigator" as he's no longer employed by them.
ETA: This Disorga guy is super polished
ETA: This Disorga guy is super polished
This post was edited on 5/30/25 at 8:57 am
Posted on 5/30/25 at 9:17 am to KosmoCramer
Why exactly is the Trooper Paul stuff out of bounds?
Page 93 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News