- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:30 pm to AlxTgr
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:30 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
I had no idea. I watch absolutely none of the trial real time.
Well then that makes sense. I assumed since you were active in this thread you were keeping up with this trial. Apologies for assuming that.
1
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:31 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Apologies for assuming that.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:33 pm to AlxTgr
Did anyone watch the Larry Forman YouTube on page 61?
Can anyone explain this Katherine Peter affidavit about a whistleblower? Exposing corruption in the Norfolk County judicial system. Is this real or just some side show muddying the trial?
Can anyone explain this Katherine Peter affidavit about a whistleblower? Exposing corruption in the Norfolk County judicial system. Is this real or just some side show muddying the trial?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:34 pm to AlxTgr
Did anyone watch the Larry Forman YouTube on page 61?
Can anyone explain this Katherine Peter affidavit about a whistleblower? Exposing corruption in the Norfolk County judicial system. Is this real or just some side show muddying the trial?
Can anyone explain this Katherine Peter affidavit about a whistleblower? Exposing corruption in the Norfolk County judicial system. Is this real or just some side show muddying the trial?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:37 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
What the frick was going on?! To me it seems Bev made a 180 there. She seemed to go from I dont see how I can allow ARCCA because this rule was broken to you’re right no rule was broken because I misinterpreted the rule.
From the few lawyers that I have watched they seem to think that she was always going to allow them to testify, hence the reason why she cut off the questioning of Rentschler after a few minutes. Then she just got ahead of her skis as she was making the ruling and started fumbling over her words. That whole sequence was really weird.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:39 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Pretty sure she realized she was confusing rules dealing with clients with those(not sure there even are any) dealing with witnesses. She realized it during the argument and ruled in his favor.
So did she also realize the entire voir dire may have not been needed? And yes I realize that is a rhetorical question.
That seems like a fairly straight forward rule and it’s not like she took time to go research the rule. She seemed to just take Alessi’s word for it make the ruling. If indeed she did just have an epiphany that oh yea I’m wrong about the rule.
I’m sorry but I think this judge has a lot problem with her bias in this case.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:39 pm to LSBoosie
I can’t watch the trial live but have been watching some witness testimony from each day every evening. Some have been so tedious. Any must see testimony today? Don’t have time to watch all tonight.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:42 pm to RPC4LSU
quote:
Can anyone explain this Katherine Peter affidavit about a whistleblower?
Is there a new affidavit by Katherine Peter about the “whistleblower”?
I don’t think the person that testified to the original affidavit is technically a whistleblower.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:44 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
Any must see testimony today?
The retired officer that finished his testimony today was pretty bad. For being a lieutenant that made around 350k/yr he seemed over paid at best if not out right incompetent.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:45 pm to civiltiger07
As bad as the FD medic?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:49 pm to civiltiger07
Worded it poorly. Forman discussed an affidavit from about a week ago. The affidavit claims Katherine Peter was being paid to influence juries, influence public opinion, tried to get Turtleboy put in jail, etc and it was all orchestrated by the DA’s office.
Is this real or a red herring?
Is this real or a red herring?
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:54 pm to RPC4LSU
quote:
Is this real or a red herring?
Someone swore to the facts in the affidavit under penalty of perjury. So it sounds like someone belongs in jail. Either the person the committed perjury or Katherine Peter, et al.
There needs to be some hearings to get to the truth.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:54 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
In fact, it might have been part of the reason why they did them, to influence potential jurors.
I share this belief as well.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 8:57 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
As bad as the FD medic?
Maybe worse because this is the guy should have investigated this situation but he was making statements about “I didn’t need to ask for this camera footage because I knew it was terrible” or “I had no reason search the house because I had no reason”.
This post was edited on 5/6/25 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 9:01 pm to civiltiger07
Lt. Gallagher was worse than the female medic, 100%
And that's just the beginning of the rabbit hole that is the clearly botched investigation.
And that's just the beginning of the rabbit hole that is the clearly botched investigation.
This post was edited on 5/6/25 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 9:01 pm to civiltiger07
Thanks. I’ll go watch his testimony then. I still think there’s no way she gets convicted no matter how many times they bring her to trial.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 9:24 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Lt. Gallagher was worse than the female medic, 100%
I agree. Between ex Trooper Proctor and this supervisor it’s a wonder these officers can catch a cold much less a criminal.
Any “evidence” those 2 morons allegedly found is highly suspect and should likely be discarded.
This post was edited on 5/6/25 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 5/6/25 at 9:41 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
That's just a video that a random person made...
Thanks. I thought it was a video taken from the scene.
Posted on 5/6/25 at 11:57 pm to OweO
quote:
That video was in the HBO documentary
This is categorically false. You must have had an uncut or unedited version that nobody else has ever seen or heard before.
Not a single report from any responder wrote that she said, “I hit him” and none of the ones that claimed to hear her say it were able to explain at what moment in the video she would have said it. It’s a big weakness in the case when these witnesses get crossed on the issue.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 7:16 am to Flick007
quote:
You must have had an uncut or unedited version that nobody else has ever seen or heard before.
The commonwealth has access to unedited versions of interviews she has done that the public hasn’t seen.
Page 66 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News