re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only

I like how he is trying to prove her innocence. Most attorneys will challenge the prosecution to prove guilt only. The prosecutions case is really cheap. No forensics pathologists. No murder weapon. It all happened on a police officers property. You figure they would at least point her out. But they won't do that. It is like they are too busy covering for themselves. I would have noticed a lady dominating a cop that has taken down many big criminals. I'm surprised he didn't call for help. (If what they say is true.) They don't even know how to explain how he died.

A mini cannon does not have the same impact as porcelain. I could use a spark plug for an example. It would be identical to porcelain found in a tooth. Or you can use porcelain dentures for an example. His DNA was found on the taillight. A past judge ruled that. The FBI is really under budget for such claims.

quote:

---

A mini cannon does not have the same impact as porcelain. I could use a spark plug for an example. It would be identical to porcelain found in a tooth. Or you can use porcelain dentures for an example. His DNA was found on the taillight. A past judge ruled that. The FBI is really under budget for such claims.

---

you are all over the place

Many people rob cars using porcelain from spark plugs. I thought cops knew that. A tooth also has porcelain.

I can't quote an entire folder dedicated to Alan Jackson. It would cause a memory overload. It would look like the prosecution with its redundant witnesses exaggerating. I wish some of those testimonies were thrown out of court. They will erase all of my statements just because of poor wording and exaggerating. But I have have to watch that prosecution rhetorically. But it's a good folder for the honorable Alan Jackson. You should check it out.

If anyone saw the autopsy photo of his arm, I’ll die on the hill that those injuries aren’t from a taillight or a cocktail glass. Those are bite marks from Chloe, who allegedly got re-homed with a quickness. ARCCA wasn’t FBI. They were physics experts that said JOK wasn’t hit by a vehicle. Hypothetically let’s say for fun that she hit him. How did his body get way up in the lawn with no footprints from where he was to the road? The 2:27 Google search by Jen McCabe “Hos long to die in cold” and ATF agent Higgins throws his cell phone away in an military base dumpster, and claims his cell phone plan had him due for an upgrade! Yeah, that’s what I do when Verizon offers me an upgrade. I drive around looking for an out of the way dumpster to throw my phone in. This case is insane and the jury should be smart enough to understand what reasonable doubt means.

quote:

---

I can't quote an entire folder dedicated to Alan Jackson. It would cause a memory overload. It would look like the prosecution with its redundant witnesses exaggerating. I wish some of those testimonies were thrown out of court. They will erase all of my statements just because of poor wording and exaggerating. But I have have to watch that prosecution rhetorically. But it's a good folder for the honorable Alan Jackson. You should check it out.

---

Anyone watched the show on HBO about the trial? Wanted to get opinions if it's worth it or not

That poster is most likely the same one that came into the Idaho college kids murder thread. A female true crime youtube junky. Their post styles are identical. Someone needs to RA