- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Just when I thought American Airlines could not sink any lower...Child porn is 9yo's fault
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:21 pm to Porpus
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:21 pm to Porpus
quote:
I don't want him tossing out potentially good arguments
Let me know the next time “you should have known there was a video recording device attached to the toilet” is a potentially good argument.
2
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:22 pm to Cell of Awareness
How the frick did their legal team think this was a better response than admitting an employee did this contrary to airline protocol?
Even if they win this case, that is going to be the PR nightmare of all time for them.
Even if they win this case, that is going to be the PR nightmare of all time for them.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:23 pm to Cell of Awareness
SFP must work for them
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:23 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Let me know the next time “you should have known there was a video recording device attached to the toilet” is a potentially good argument.
The NINE YEAR OLD should have known.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:25 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Let me know the next time “you should have known there was a video recording device attached to the toilet” is a potentially good argument.
again, this was a contracted law firm, chances are that he or she knows nothing about airline/security operations and was just throwing shite against the wall to see what might stick
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:25 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
The NINE YEAR OLD should have known.
I bet that lawyer is also of the opinion that nine year old can consent to a sex change without parental approval.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:25 pm to Czechessential
quote:
was just throwing shite against the wall to see what might stick
Know what won’t stick? This lawyer being contracted to work for AA.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:26 pm to teke184
quote:
This lawyer being contracted to work for AA.
fact!!
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:26 pm to Czechessential
quote:
again, this was a contracted law firm, chances are that he or she knows nothing about airline/security operations and was just throwing shite against the wall to see what might stick
And if you can find a single case where a 9 year old was found culpable at any level? What if he said the reason was she was black?
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:29 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
And if you can find a single case where a 9 year old was found culpable at any level? What if he said the reason was she was black?
again, the nine year old didn't file the suit(I don't know who did,) but this, at face value sounds like a criminal charge, suing the company is searching for a payout
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:30 pm to Czechessential
quote:
chances are that he or she knows nothing about airline/security operations
Maybe he should learn something about his client’s operations before submitting the filing? It’s not like he or she is supposedly an intelligent person with an advanced degree or anything.
I also don’t need to know anything about airline security to know that it’s a safe and reasonable assumption that the toilet I’m using doesn’t have a device video recording my dick and balls
This post was edited on 5/22/24 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:31 pm to Czechessential
quote:
again, the nine year old didn't file the suit
Effectively she did. It was filed on her behalf by her parents.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:34 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
It was filed on her behalf by her parents.
probably after a visit from Gordon
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:36 pm to Porpus
quote:
If there's an argument to be made that the victim didn't do what was necessary and reasonable
The victim was 9 years old. What exactly do you think a 9 year old thinks is necessary and reasonable when they go to the bathroom on an airplane?
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:36 pm to teke184
quote:
How the frick did their legal team think this was a better response than admitting an employee did this contrary to airline protocol?
They probably have a boilerplate response form to the lawsuit that raises every available legal defense and rather than read through them all and check for any that seem awkward or stupid, they just printed it out and filed at the courthouse.
A lot of legal claims are "use it or lose it" so if you don't raise them in the initial response they are deemed waived. So firms use boilerplate forms that raise them all.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:38 pm to Czechessential
quote:
again, the nine year old didn't file the suit(I don't know who did,) but this, at face value sounds like a criminal charge, suing the company is searching for a payout
You don't think the airline should be sued for a 9 year old being recorded in the bathroom?
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:38 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Maybe he should learn something about his client’s operations before submitting the filing? It’s not like he or she is supposedly an intelligent person with an advanced degree or anything.
DEI and outsourcing? get what you pay for
quote:
I also don’t need to know anything about airline security to know that it’s a safe and reasonable assumption that the toilet I’m using doesn’t have a device video recording my dick and balls
that's where you're wrong, when it comes to security the best practice is to "keep 'em guessing" as opposed to being 100% routine and predictable
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:38 pm to AUFANATL
You still have to weigh losing a defense vs the PR damage taken by even raising it.
How much money would the airline lose if they lost this case?
How much damage does the airline take from claiming this defense even if they win?
How much money would the airline lose if they lost this case?
How much damage does the airline take from claiming this defense even if they win?
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:41 pm to Czechessential
quote:
that's where you're wrong
How am I wrong? The airline itself agrees with me and disagrees with their own attorney.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 4:41 pm to Porpus
quote:
It's a legal proceeding. I'd expect my lawyer to use whatever tactic he can to limit my exposure. I don't want him tossing out potentially good arguments because "that sounds too mean." If there's an argument to be made that the victim didn't do what was necessary and reasonable, and that's not my fault, it needs to be made.
It’s a 9 year old girl. You and your hypothetical attorney are idiots.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News