- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/6/20 at 2:33 pm to Alt26
LRS 29:721-739
Posted on 8/6/20 at 2:39 pm to goofball
Court of Appeals will overturn her ruling as they always do.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 2:50 pm to Junky
quote:
We live in a dictatorship
The state of emergency can be ended by a simple majority of either chamber of the Legislature signing a petition.
Weakest dictatorship I’ve ever seen.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 2:51 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Then why, exactly, is she still on the bench?
pretty sure she was grandfathered in and it only applies to new judge positions after the law passed
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:09 pm to goofball
quote:
FYI , Janice Clark is 73 years old. Mandatory judiciary retirement in Louisiana is 70.
Janice ain't going anywhere. You will have to pry her cold dead hands off the gavel and drag her corpse out before she leave voluntarily.
The Hague, The International Court of Justice, The U.N., International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. She will try everything and anything before she concedes and leaves office.
There is still havoc to wreak, and she ain't done wreaking havoc.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:28 pm to Alt26
quote:
I'd like to see the written reasons (if any) or the transcript of her ruling.
SCOTUS literally just ruled on a similar issue regarding churches.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:30 pm to Junky
quote:
We live in a dictatorship.
The legislature could very easily override JBE's COVID-related actions, or reigned in his emergency powers. They chose not to.
How, exactly, is that a dictatorship? Louisiana doesn't have a dictatorship. We have the exact cesspool of a state government that we vote for and deserve.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:32 pm to goofball
quote:
“The court is firmly of the opinion that the governor has exercised his power deliberately, on behalf of the people of this state and in an effort to be proactive to limit the loss of life,” Clark said.
My question is how long though? How long can this order stay intact and that's how subjective it is.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:35 pm to boosiebadazz
Thats why they had to make this <1% fatality rate virus as big and bad as possible. The sky is falling!!! They had to in order to get those types of judgements and opinions.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:39 pm to rattlebucket
You guys clamor for judicial restraint all the time and lament “activist judges”, and now you want a judge to step in and overrule a discretionary call made by the executive using distinct and delineated powers given to him by the legislature with a built-in rescission provision requiring a simple majority of either chamber. That’s less than it takes to pass the law granting him the power in the first place.
For a bunch of small government conservatives, you sure are looking like big government democrats asking the judiciary to save you when you should be beating down the door of your state rep telling him to do his fricking job.
For a bunch of small government conservatives, you sure are looking like big government democrats asking the judiciary to save you when you should be beating down the door of your state rep telling him to do his fricking job.
This post was edited on 8/6/20 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:42 pm to goofball
quote:
Judge Janice Clark
Did you expect any other outcome with that bitch hearing the case
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:45 pm to goofball
mi maw's every are rejoicing
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:45 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You guys clamor for judicial restraint all the time and lament “activist judges”, and now you want a judge to step in and overrule a discretionary call made by the executive using distinct and delineated powers given to him by the legislature with a built-in rescission provision requiring a simple majority of either chamber. That’s less than it takes to pass the law granting him the power in the first place.
For a bunch of small government conservatives, you sure are looking like big government democrats asking the judiciary to save you when you should be beating down the door of your state rep telling him to do his fricking job.
I'm confused. Assuming someone feels that this judge made a poor interpretation of the law, That person shouldn't voice their displeasure because it somehow makes them "big government" to expect judges to do their jobs correctly?
I do agree that people upset with this should actively be contacting their representatives as well.
This post was edited on 8/6/20 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:46 pm to LNCHBOX
Tell us what law she interpreted, the applicable standards, and how she erred.
I’ll wait.
I’ll wait.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:47 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Tell us what law she interpreted, the applicable standards, and how she erred.
I’ll wait.
Interesting way to not answer the question.
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:49 pm to goofball
quote:
Judge Janice Clark
I thought she'd be.... taller
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:50 pm to goofball
Edwards did make it sound pretty easy for a bar to reopen today. They are allowing temporary food licenses.
So serve hotdogs, spread tables out then voila you can serve drinks.
So serve hotdogs, spread tables out then voila you can serve drinks.
This post was edited on 8/6/20 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 8/6/20 at 3:51 pm to LNCHBOX
Aka you have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’ll give you a hint. Go read the link I posted on the Fifth Circuit opinion. Courts are to give great deference to the prerogatives and decisions of the executive in a declared emergency. The fail-safe, separation of powers mechanism is the legislature, not the judiciary. The legislature is a more direct expression of the will of the people and if the problem have a problem with what the executive decided, the legislature should reign it in. They’ve given themselves the mechanism to do so, but have so far declined to utilize it.
I’ll give you a hint. Go read the link I posted on the Fifth Circuit opinion. Courts are to give great deference to the prerogatives and decisions of the executive in a declared emergency. The fail-safe, separation of powers mechanism is the legislature, not the judiciary. The legislature is a more direct expression of the will of the people and if the problem have a problem with what the executive decided, the legislature should reign it in. They’ve given themselves the mechanism to do so, but have so far declined to utilize it.
This post was edited on 8/6/20 at 3:52 pm
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News