- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Judge Rules Defendant in Gruver Trial Must Give Cellphone Password to Prosecutors
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:19 am
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:19 am
LINK
Yikes. This one may make it to the Supreme Court.
quote:
BATON ROUGE - A judge has ruled that one former fraternity members charged in the hazing death of Max Gruver must allow prosecutors to access his cellphone.
A judge ruled Monday morning that Matthew Naquin must give up the pass code, allowing the state access to his phone.
Naquin is the only person charged with negligent homicide in the death of the late LSU student. Last fall, Gruver drank himself to death as part of a fraternity's hazing ritual.
Testimonies and evidence lead officials to believe that Naquin was the ringleader of the group and targeted Gruver to make him drink more than others.
Yikes. This one may make it to the Supreme Court.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:20 am to TigersSEC2010
Shouldve pulled a Tom Brady and destroyed the phone before they took it
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:20 am to TigersSEC2010
This is going to be interesting. I definitely see/understand the argument for both.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:21 am to TigersSEC2010
What's worse? Being found guilty or being held in contempt forever?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:21 am to TigersSEC2010
So what if he just keeps saying no?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:22 am to TigersSEC2010
I still wouldn’t do it if I were him
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:22 am to 225Tyga
quote:held in contempt of court pending an appeal by his lawyer(s)?
So what if he just keeps saying no?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:23 am to TigersSEC2010
"Your honor, I don't remember."
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:24 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Must Give Cellphone Password to Prosecutors
That'd be a big fat NO
I'd give them 10 guesses
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:24 am to Jim Rockford
Yeah I’m giving them a password. Whether it works or not is not my fault. It’s been a long time.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:25 am to TigersSEC2010
Yeah I bet the fact he hasn't had access to the phone for a year now conveniently means from lack of use, password forgotten. Sorry judge. 
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:26 am to TigersSEC2010
I assume the fifth amendment doesn't apply since they have a warrant?
But that would totally be self incrimination, right?
But that would totally be self incrimination, right?
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:27 am to TigersSEC2010
They’re gonna see all the his porn history.
He’s finished.
He’s finished.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:29 am to Clark W Griswold
quote:
Yeah I’m giving them a password. Whether it works or not is not my fault. It’s been a long time.
This is the correct answer.
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:31 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Yikes. This one may make it to the Supreme Court.
probably not since there have been several rulings like this
Posted on 1/28/19 at 10:31 am to Displaced
quote:
I assume the fifth amendment doesn't apply since they have a warrant?
4th Amendment will govern this,and the fact that a warrant was issued does not prohibit a challenge to the constitutionality of the warrant.
5th Amendment also triggered to extent this is self incriminating. I thought that the Courts have drawn a distinction between forcing fingerprint pass codes vs. requiring numerical pass code?
This post was edited on 1/28/19 at 3:04 pm
Popular
Back to top

30


















