- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
JFK and AI
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:46 pm
Thus proving that AI is only as good as the information put into it, I give you JFK and Ai contradiction.
If someone was shot in the head and the back of the skull was blow off, which direction would be the most likely direction for the shot to have come from
ChatGPT said:
If someone were shot in the head and the back of the skull was blown off, the most likely direction for the shot to have come from would be from the front or slightly to the side, not from behind.
Also ChatGPT - Not this is the key example of the explanation above.
4. Key Example - JFK:
In the case of President John F. Kennedy, the wound to the back of his head (the occipital wound) was associated with the bullet exiting from the front. The large exit wound at the front/top of his skull led many to believe that the shot came from the rear (at least one shot), but some conspiracy theorists suggest it may have been a shot from the front (from the grassy knoll), pointing to the back of his skull being blown off. This is one reason why the trajectory of the shot has been a point of contention and debate.
CHATGPT basically labels itself a conspiracy theorist by its first explantion.
If someone was shot in the head and the back of the skull was blow off, which direction would be the most likely direction for the shot to have come from
ChatGPT said:
If someone were shot in the head and the back of the skull was blown off, the most likely direction for the shot to have come from would be from the front or slightly to the side, not from behind.
Also ChatGPT - Not this is the key example of the explanation above.
4. Key Example - JFK:
In the case of President John F. Kennedy, the wound to the back of his head (the occipital wound) was associated with the bullet exiting from the front. The large exit wound at the front/top of his skull led many to believe that the shot came from the rear (at least one shot), but some conspiracy theorists suggest it may have been a shot from the front (from the grassy knoll), pointing to the back of his skull being blown off. This is one reason why the trajectory of the shot has been a point of contention and debate.
CHATGPT basically labels itself a conspiracy theorist by its first explantion.
10
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:54 pm to winkchance
The least interesting part of the JFK assassination is all the debate about a 2nd shooter. He was in a moving car waving all different directions. There is no evidence that a 2nd shooter existed.
No conspiracy will be unraveled unless we learn more about Lee Harvey Oswald's whereabouts and associations in the months prior to the shooting.
No conspiracy will be unraveled unless we learn more about Lee Harvey Oswald's whereabouts and associations in the months prior to the shooting.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 2:59 pm to winkchance
quote:
Thus proving that AI is only as good as the information put into it
Opposed to? AI that isn't as good as the information put into it? Whether you are asking AI to write code or fly a plane it has to be fed information to do so. Whatever comes from AI, its because of what was fed to it.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:25 pm to OweO
There was a 4th shot. It richocheted off the cement and hit some guy in the shin. He went to the hospital that day. The impact could be seen on the cement. It was confirned by acoustics of a motorcycle policeman's mic. Chat GPT has this - The United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) concluded in 1979 that President John F. Kennedy was likely assassinated as a result of a conspiracy and that there was a high probability of a second gunman in addition to Lee Harvey Oswald.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:28 pm to winkchance
Nobody shot from the grassy knoll.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:29 pm to OweO
quote:
Opposed to? AI that isn't as good as the information put into it? Whether you are asking AI to write code or fly a plane it has to be fed information to do so. Whatever comes from AI, its because of what was fed to it.
Did you just restate his thesis?
“As opposed” to being accurate or consistent or providing new insight or being reliable.
In other words, don’t trust AI to be more true than any other jackleg with an opinion, and maybe worse.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:37 pm to winkchance
quote:
CHATGPT basically labels itself a conspiracy theorist by its first explantion.
How?
First explanation says back of head would be blown off if shot came from the front.
Second explanation said his large exit wound was in the top/front (which would mean shot came from back).
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:18 pm to Ping Pong
Documents from 1970’s (part of the reports) actually state otherwise.
There is no proof of a lone shooter if you utilize:
- physics
- eye witness testimony (also how the Holy Bible was written)
- common sense
There is no proof of a lone shooter if you utilize:
- physics
- eye witness testimony (also how the Holy Bible was written)
- common sense
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:24 pm to Tbone2
Thank you. Some people forget about this and simply repeat what they were told by the government regarding a lone shooter (and clearly don’t think for themselves)
Posted on 3/21/25 at 6:20 pm to winkchance
JFK was killed by some combination of the mob, the deep state, and Israel. The number of shooters is much less interesting to me compared to who ordered them to do it.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 6:51 pm to Nutriaitch
Correct. However, the shot came from the back-left side. Oswald was over JFK’s right shoulder & could not short him from the left side. Those are some of the details AI is leaving out… context matters.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 3/21/25 at 7:03 pm to Ping Pong
You might want to read “Dr. Mary’s Monkey” by Ed Haslam. You’ll find some of your questions answered there.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 7:12 pm to STLDawg
quote:Just like 9/11 the Deep State successfully contained the investigation to how the buildings fell rather than the consequences of the day and who benefitted.
The number of shooters is much less interesting to me compared to who ordered them to do it.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:17 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
the shot came from the back-left side. Oswald was over JFK’s right shoulder & could not short him from the left side. Those are some of the details AI is leaving out… context ma
His head was turned to the left and down toward Jackie after he was shot through the throat. That makes 6th floor of TSBD back-left.
Some of the nonsense in here. No the back of his head wasn’t blown out. No he wasn’t shot from the front. No the driver didn’t shoot him. No George Bush didn’t shoot him. No the acoustical evidence doesn’t prove four shots.
Every piece of tangible, credible evidence points to LHO and LHO alone. Every point of contention has been discredited. The shots were replicated. The timing was replicated. The bullet was replicated. The reaction of head and body upon impact replicated. Physics, trajectory, ballistics, autopsy, eye witnesses, presidential commission - and a complete lack of any hard evidence to the contrary of any of these - and y’all still get anal hooked by every X post about some sort of grand conspiracy. I’ve never seen so many irrefutable fallacies passed as fact than with the JFK assassination.
Documented history as a shooter. Documented history at odds with American government. Bought the gun. Took a photo with the gun. Brought the gun to work. Shot from his place of employment. Observed fleeing place of employment. When confronted, kills a police officer with - oh yeah, another gun he just happened to bring to work and flee with. Arrested in movie theater after resisting.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 8:47 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
It was Oswald alone...there are no facts to the contrary. Read Case Closed, it removes all doubt. Oswald was a nut job.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 9:02 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
Yet, the report & evidence state otherwise w/ context taken into account.
Posted on 3/21/25 at 11:32 pm to AmosMosesAndTwins
His head also went back & to the left.
You still have not accounted for the 4th shot that hit concrete
You still have not accounted for the 4th shot that hit concrete
Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:03 am to tiger81
Wrong. There is a hearing on April 1 regarding some of the evidence released. They are saying Oswald was indeed a patsy, and the CIA was definitely involved.
Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:47 am to winkchance
Good grief. There was a single gunman. Oswald. They found his gun, shell casings, fingerprints, records of him owning the gun, etc etc. Was he put up to it who knows but the evidence doesn’t point that way. He tried to shoot a right wing General and he got the job at the SBD way before JFK even decided on the Texas trip.
Posted on 3/22/25 at 10:52 am to winkchance
Pretty well accepted already it was a CIA hit and there were multiple shooters well before the last round of documents were released confirming it. They were killing everyone back in those days, the 60s were lit man
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News