- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: January 1, 2025: Multiple casualties on Bourbon Street after terrorist attack..
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:34 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:34 am to LNCHBOX
Well, if you’re being intellectually honest it shows that you still mitigate risk although you cannot prevent it. The city still floods, homes still get destroyed.
You seem to be an all or nothing type of person, risk mitigation isn’t about preventing every scenario
You seem to be an all or nothing type of person, risk mitigation isn’t about preventing every scenario
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:35 am to CatfishJohn
Tuoro is not obscure for car aficionados.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:35 am to Decatur
"2 IEDs found and rendered safe"
"video obtained showing Jabbar placing devices where they were located"
"video obtained showing Jabbar placing devices where they were located"
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:35 am to fightin tigers
quote:
Would that help you in some way?
No but if I can see people getting ran over I can handle watching why this guy did it instead of the government censoring it and protecting this religion instead of exposing it.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:35 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Can I ask specifically what you are arguing here? Do nothing?
Why do we "need" to do anything in response to a random act of terror? I'm more concerned that he was able to get bombs in place that would have been much more devastating than the vehicle was
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:36 am to DCtiger1
quote:
You seem to be an all or nothing type of person
So much for intellectual honesty.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:36 am to DCtiger1
quote:
Well, if you’re being intellectually honest it shows that you still mitigate risk although you cannot prevent it. The city still floods, homes still get destroyed.
Wonder why the city still floods
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:36 am to GeauxTigers123
FBI @ presser:
at this point, NO DEFINITIVE LINK between Vegas and New Orleans
at this point, NO DEFINITIVE LINK between Vegas and New Orleans
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:37 am to Ziggy
quote:
FBI bomb technicians found ONLY 2 IEDs on burbon st that were functioning
How many did they find that were in the process of being made?
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:37 am to Ziggy
quote:
at this point, NO DEFINITIVE LINK between Vegas and New Orleans
Use of the word "definitive" is very interesting.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:37 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
Maybe not obscure but it's not as common as others.
350,000 active vehicles in the US. Hertz is like 450,000. It’s one of the most common car rental companies in our country.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:38 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why do we "need" to do anything in response to a random act of terror? I'm more concerned that he was able to get bombs in place that would have been much more devastating than the vehicle was
It demonstrated a flaw in current preventative measures.
At the very minimum, fixing the flaw would mitigate that.
As well as mitigate other things beyond simple safety protocols.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:38 am to Ziggy
quote:
at this point, NO DEFINITIVE LINK between Vegas and New Orleans
People linking these two are dumb
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:38 am to TDsngumbo
Turo isn't obscure, anyone who legitimately travels has probably used it. It has been around for awhile.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:38 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why do we "need" to do anything in response to a random act of terror? I'm more concerned that he was able to get bombs in place that would have been much more devastating than the vehicle was
It’s so commonplace that it’s already enacted in the area. Just updating the system, which already has been in place nearly a decade.
Plopping in like 6 extra bollards potentially is too far a bridge to cross here?
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:39 am to TakingStock
Hard to believe anything after the “not a terrorist attack” comment.
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:39 am to TakingStock
quote:
Use of the word "definitive" is very interesting.
he also emphasized that the investigation is still very early and this is "as of now".
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:39 am to SidewalkTiger
Anyone who cant figure out a simple way to keep cars out of an area is either retarded or stands to profit from a more complicated system.


Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:39 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
It demonstrated a flaw in current preventative measures.
At the very minimum, fixing the flaw would mitigate that.
As well as mitigate other things beyond simple safety protocols.
sigh, again, just how far out do we fix the flaw? And why are you ok with risking other crowded areas where ever you decide to not protect?
And why let Mardi Gras happen at all? That's a way bigger risk than anything in the FQ
Posted on 1/2/25 at 10:40 am to FreddieMac
quote:
How many did they find that were in the process of being made?
Or that were nonfunctional (i.e., built but built incorrectly).
Popular
Back to top


2





