re: Ivermectin: Cancer killer Are you aware of these studies?

New proposed 10 interventions for all solid cancers

Above is a Merogenomics YouTube channel link of a talk about an emerging anti cancer protocol described in the paper "Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol."

The anti cancer protocol has 10 interventions presented in the paper and discussed in the YouTube video. The interventions include maintenance of high vitamin D, maintenance of an extremely low carb high fat diet with fasting and supplementation with anti parasitic drugs ivermectin and mebendazole. Fenbendazole isn't mentioned.

The paper is linked below the video in the show notes..

quote:

---

Pharmaceutical companies will never conduct honest trials of anything that doesn't earn them profits in the billions.

---

It really seems this is the case. A small portion of the waste and corrupt use of our tax dollars recently exposed by DOGE could be redirected to unbiased research not funded by or staffed with the pharmaceutical companies lackeys. A little could go a long way.

quote:

---

I know some people who were diagnosed as terminal a few years ago and are still here today. Side effects dont seem to be much of an issue for most people. I guess you have to decide for yourself if it is worth the risk using unapproved meds for human use.

---

Mel Gibson said the same on Rogans podcast. He had 2 friends with stage 4 that no longer have it after taking Ivermectin, Feben, Methylene blue etc

quote:

---

Invermectin, if it had any potential as a cancer medication, would be prescribed.

---

I don't have a dog in the ivermectin fight, but I do not believe any industry, even the medical industry, would solve problems that create its own destruction.

That's not how humans or capitalism work.

quote:

---

Invermectin, if it had any potential as a cancer medication, would be prescribed.


I don't have a dog in the ivermectin fight, but I do not believe any industry, even the medical industry, would solve problems that create its own destruction.

That's not how humans or capitalism work.

---

Every physician I work with tries to decrease cancer risk for their patients.

We tell patients to have colonoscopies where the colon cancer can be removed as a polyp before it needs chemo and surgery. We tell patients to stop smoking which cuts lung and bladder cancer rates-among others. A significant portion of liver cancer is caused by hepatitis caused cirrhosis and drugs can now cure Hep C at high rates. We tell people to get skin cancer screening to catch melanoma before immunotherapy is needed. We perform genetic testing on a large number of patients in case they have genes that code for cancer so more intense screening or procedures can be implemented to prevent a patient from getting cancer or catching at an early stage where chemotherapy will not be required( for example bilateral mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA carriers).HPV vaccines were developed in order to decrease cervical, anal, and head and neck cancer prevalence- of which a high percentage are caused by the HPV infection.

And our newer anticancer therapies cure a higher percentage of cancer cases.


Cancer is not one disease- it is many- there are over 60 subtypes of just lymphoma. One drug is not curing all cancer. Hence even if ivermectin worked to some degree, it almost assuredly would only work for a small fraction of cancer. Chemotherapy did not cure all cancer , the new immunotherapy agents are a step forward but do not work for all cancer, etc. Oncologists have no fear they will suddenly be destitute from ivermectin or any of the other miracle cures we have heard about over the years. ( laetrile, noni juice, Gershon method, antineoplastins, colloidal silver, alkaline diet, CBD, shark cartilage, etc). If its too good to be true- it is. There is not a cure of a hundred diseases with no side effects. And indeed there is money to be made from these agents- the people who tout these miracle cures make plenty.

quote:

---

I don't have a dog in the ivermectin fight, but I do not believe any industry, even the medical industry, would solve problems that create its own destruction.

---

It is a simple argument, but excuse the directness; it is also simple-minded. People saved from one form of death are still going to die and still going to need or want intervention from the medical industry. Death and taxes.

Interventional cardiologists have taken a lot of work off my wife's table, but they continue to age and don't change their lifestyles and end up in her OR just at a later time. The issue you are missing is the longer people live, they just produce more work for the doctors and surgeons. Look at the history of medicine, they don't need to avoid low-cost cures; they will make their money as the people age. If you take a close look, keeping people alive longer increases the revenue as a whole.

My wife has patients she has patched up multiple times; in the past, they probably wouldn't have lived to have a second surgery, much less a third or fourth.

Oddly enough, my wife has taken HCQ daily for lupus since 2019, everyone in the house has had COVID (I had it twice) and she has never gotten it. I know, “granny smoked Pall Malls”, but it’s interesting you said that.

quote:

---

My oncologist doesn’t believe that there’s enough evidence that it’s helpful.

---

If your oncologist couldn’t prescribe radiation / chemo, would they still be an oncologist?

Think about that and see how much probative value you give to their opinion on ivermectin and various other anthelmintics since they’re available OTC.

It’s all a racket…ivermectin is amazing as are other anthelmintics.

quote:

---

We tell patients to have colonoscopies where the colon cancer can be removed as a polyp before it needs chemo and surgery. We tell patients to stop smoking which cuts lung and bladder cancer rates-among others. A significant portion of liver cancer is caused by hepatitis caused cirrhosis and drugs can now cure Hep C at high rates. We tell people to get skin cancer screening to catch melanoma before immunotherapy is needed.

---

Which is admirable, with the exception that the entire industry lost their freaking minds over a $5 scrip, that throughout its history never caused one death. That sounds shady. How the hell did it even rise to that level? Drs scared to prescribe it, pharmacies refused to carry it.

There was just too much there, there. What possible outcome could they have been afraid of. I got realllll suspicious after I read this (written prior to the pandemic)

quote:

---

The Journal of Antibiotics: Ivermectin: enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug continues to surprise and exceed expectations. Over the past decade, the global scientific community have begun to recognize the unmatched value of an extraordinary drug, ivermectin, that originates from a single microbe unearthed from soil in Japan. Work on ivermectin has seen its discoverer, Satoshi Omura, receive the 2014 Gairdner Global Health Award and the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine

Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary.

---

Thats not a drug you piss of as simply a horse de-wormer, if millions are dropping dead all around you

Multiple States are making it an OTC medicine. It's a damn shame that so many people were demonizing a medicine that people were desperate for any type of relief.