Started By
Message

re: Is there anyone who actually thinks that OJ is innocent?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:10 pm to
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64089 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:10 pm to
Here's the full 8 minute bit that sums up the trial perfectly.

LINK
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47404 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I might be remembering it incorrectly, but I think the shoe print wasn't determined to be OJ's until the civil trial. Yes, they had the imprint and approximate size, and they knew it was a Bruno Magli shoe but they couldn't connect them to OJ.

It was the civil trial that found the picture of OJ wearing Bruno Magli shoes.

Again, it's been 30 years.


You are correct. They didn't identify the shoes as his until the civil trial when they found a picture of him wearing the shoes. I don't think the question is about the criminal trial, but whether you believe him to be innocent. The shoe picture was icing on the guilt cake for me.

The criminal case was botched badly so I wasn't surprised by the verdict. Law enforcement and the prosecution lost that case, but I believe he was guilty or he was on the scene at some point, at the very least.
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22756 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:13 pm to
O.J. Simpson was an abusive liar who abandoned his community long before he killed two people in cold blood. His acquittal for murder was the correct and necessary result of a racist criminal legal system.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15329 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:14 pm to
As my mom stated, most black people figured that OJ may have been guilty at the time. But after the Rodney King trial, they just wanted a victory real bad at the time. People were already gearing up to riot. She watched the trial and was convinced he was guilty, but she couldn't help but celebrate also. Kind of fricked up in hindsight.

The way I see it, from Rodney King to OJ connection, 2 wrongs do not make a right.

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
72130 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

OJ Simpson didn't kill Nicole and Ron. It was his son, Jason.


Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
53854 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

As my mom stated, most black people figured that OJ may have been guilty at the time. But after the Rodney King trial, they just wanted a victory real bad at the time. People were already gearing up to riot. She watched the trial and was convinced he was guilty, but she couldn't help but celebrate also. Kind of fricked up in hindsight.


I’ve always believed this, but thank you for confirming.

I was doing my student teaching at a high school that was about 50/50 racially when the trial took place. On the day of the verdict, every television in the school was tuned in. When not guilty was announced, EVERY black student was cheering, yelling, and jumping around. EVERY white student just remained in their seats with a stunned, incredulous expression on their faces. One of the most unique social phenomenons I’ve ever witnessed.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116072 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:34 pm to
If Rodney King does not happen, OJ goes to jail.

3 black female jurors were interviewed years later and they admitted that OJ was guilty likely, but they acquitted for what amounts to revenge against whitey.
Posted by H newman
Member since Oct 2021
1187 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:37 pm to
Blacks knew he did it..they just didn't give a shite. We are being hunted.
Posted by Hennigan
Member since Jan 2020
988 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:50 pm to
Robert Barnes, big time lawyer / lawtube Podcaster, thinks he didn't do it. I've heard him talk about it, but don't think he's done an episode about it. If I remember correctly he thinks the time line doesn't work and there should have been more blood in the Bronco or something like that. I was pretty surprised to hear him say that.
Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14654 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:51 pm to
Khloe Kardashian
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26492 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

able to plant the seed of doubt in the jurors.


Had nothing to do with it. They acquitted him because he was black.
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
6207 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:55 pm to
The LAPD was pretty sloppy.
Part of it was that forensics/DNA was pretty new.
They didn't know how to properly handle evidence.

Defense tore them apart.

But, yeah OJ was guilty as frick.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54479 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

Is there anyone who actually thinks that OJ was innocent?

FIFY
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44949 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Even in real life, I haven't talked to a single person who thinks he is innocent(and I'm black).


Then why were so many black people cheering when this murderer walked free? Is it solely because he killed white people and got away with it?
Posted by Z Cavaricci
Member since Jun 2020
1029 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 4:59 pm to
If I was innocent of murdering someone, I wouldn’t be running from the cops with makeup adhesive, a fake mustache, goatee, cash,passport and a gun in vehicle.
Posted by CatsGoneWild
Pigeon forge, Tennessee
Member since Jan 2008
13335 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:01 pm to
I must be the only one who thinks he didn’t kill them
Posted by litenin
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
2352 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:04 pm to
That night with the police chase was crazy. Everyone remembers where they were.

I kept up with trial but didn’t actually watch it.
Posted by South Shore Cyclist
Member since Jul 2023
160 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

OJs son did it


Motive?
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30408 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

I might be remembering it incorrectly, but I think the shoe print wasn't determined to be OJ's until the civil trial. Yes, they had the imprint and approximate size, and they knew it was a Bruno Magli shoe but they couldn't connect them to OJ.

It was the civil trial that found the picture of OJ wearing Bruno Magli shoes.

Again, it's been 30 years.



I think your recollection is mostly correct. Those shoes were incredibly rare. 299 total pairs sold in the US at the time and I think 9% were size 12 in that size (they were sure of the size by my recollection).
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124387 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 5:21 pm to
Gravy
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram