Started By
Message

re: Is the average lifespan of a human not long enough or too long?

Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:18 am to
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
23377 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:18 am to
Do you want your body to outlive your brain or your brain to outlive your body?
Posted by shankedshot
Wham
Member since Oct 2019
233 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:21 am to
quote:

i plan to see S jr. bequeath our fortune to S III one day.


I have some wisdom for you. They will piss it away as soon as thy can get you into the cold cold ground. Then they will hate you for not leaving them more.

Spend that shite before you die, And don't say it is not possible. I could make suggestions that would allow you to die happy and stone broke, having spent whatever you have on #1.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:41 am to
I dont care about a max age, but wish everyone got the same amount of time. I'm 32 and a classmate just passed this week from breast cancer. Shes been fighting it for years. So sad that her husband now doesn't have a wife, her parents are burying her, and she didn't have children. Incredibly sad.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57514 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 5:49 am to
quote:

the added benefit of having a population of “elders” who’ve seen and lived through more than a century of life and could offer better historical guidance for future generations.


There is very little respect for elders now.
Posted by sardog12
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
1184 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 6:37 am to
With the way that shite is going now and is only likely to speed up, do you really want to be around in another 100 years?
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24915 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 6:39 am to
Definitely too short..
I am 50 and still in my young adult stage!!
Posted by Theotherpikecounty
pike county
Member since Aug 2014
678 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Imagine living long enough to meet your great great grandchildren.



Some demographics this is a common occurrence. At a conservative rate of 15 years you can 7 generations in 90 years.
Posted by LAcajun2
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2017
178 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 7:05 am to
The elders thing is interesting because you’d have a mix of wisdom possessing sages but at this time we’d be having Civil War era people still trying to own people
This post was edited on 11/23/19 at 7:06 am
Posted by phunkatron
Member since Jun 2019
1444 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 7:16 am to
Ride the social security for 90 years obviously
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17798 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 7:41 am to
We would have too many people on this earth. It would start a downward spiral of overused resources and billions of people would starve be to death
Posted by Taurus
Loozianna
Member since Feb 2015
4955 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 7:49 am to
Lifespan is defined by number of heartbeats in you. Only have so many and how you use them determines your lifespan.

But cancer, autoimmune diseases, heart defects, or accidents are the exceptions to that rule. My opinion only, but it is a philosophy I see just through my family history prism.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62293 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 8:09 am to
quote:

If we had double the amount of time,


People can’t afford to retire now. What would that be like if we lived until 150?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60246 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 8:13 am to
I would like to see a longer lifespan but would want that extension to be with our bodies remaining in the 22-27 yr old range of health and vigor for much longer.
Posted by Fe_Mike
Member since Jul 2015
3885 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Like I’d rather fall asleep and wake up dead
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
103862 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 8:56 am to
quote:

My daughter got to know her great grandfather for 11 years and he was mentally with it up until the last 6 months. I thought it was pretty awesome but certainly not the norm. I never met any of mine.



I knew 4 of mine. 5 were alive when I was born but I don’t remember my great grandmother on my dad’s side cause when I was about 3 yrs old she was sick and dying and always laid up in bed, don’t remember ever actually seeing her. I knew 3 of my great grandparents until I was 9, 11, and 20 years old. The one that passed when I was 20 was 99 a few weeks from turning 100
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61011 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 9:12 am to
Too long
Posted by YatInTheHat
Member since Apr 2017
954 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 9:32 am to
quote:

People can’t afford to retire now. What would that be like if we lived until 150?


Economy and a money based society needs to be reworked anyway. No need for the basic cost of living to be as expensive as it is.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
23228 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 9:41 am to

Too short.

Life is only too long when poor health factors in.

There's always something new to learn or do.
Posted by damnedoldtigah
Middle of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2014
4275 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:11 am to
90 doesn't look bad. 110 would be my optimal. After working your arse off for 40 to 45 years, you would like time to enjoy your life a but more. Problem with life span increasing are the various health maladies that come with advanced age. While our age span has made a significant increase over the past couple of centuries, so has the onset of medical conditions we didn't deal with. That said, I am currently 65 and would love to live another 25 years as long as I am in good health and sound mind.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12644 posts
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:11 pm to
I think it would be more possible to have them age congruent with each other if people lived longer. All the scientists now working towards curing Alzheimer’s and such, as well as scientists working towards advances for stem cell treatments to cure bodily function ailments, would have a longer time to continue their research, and subsequently there would be scientists and researchers who in the past would die at 70, taking their mind with them, who would still be alive and able to work alongside more modern thinkers. Who knows what that kind of problems that collective scientific community of elders and young bright minds could solve.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram