- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Investigators When they KNEW Murdaugh lied (Page 112)
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:44 am to Festus
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:44 am to Festus
quote:
EVERYONE I've listened to this morning on trial channels are all stating that they believe he's dead in the water
The two women jurors crying during his testimony isn’t really good news for the prosecution.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:45 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
SLED testified they never asked for the shirt or went looking for it. That's in evidence.
Which is why they obtained so much testimony from AM that he was a friend of SLED and they constantly were trying to cover for him and his family. It had been going on for generations.
quote:
If they believe he murdered them in the blue shirt, why did they test, retest, and retest the white shirt? Why did they spend days of testimony about it in their case in chief?
Again, why did he change shirts?
We can do this all day. I haven't seen the trial from day one, so I'm not familiar with everything and don't want to come across as I do. I'm repeating what every single legal expert was saying this morning.
And I will just say, yesterday, you stated that the state presented "literally" no evidence that would give the jury any reason to convict. And you argued that it's a known positive strategy for defense attorneys to put their client on the stand, as opposed to being more of a desperate move when the state has done a good job of proving their case. When people pointed out most defense counsel try to keep their client off the stand to avoid damaging cross, you argued that was false and exactly opposite, even though most don't put their client on.
I just think you're a bit over the top in favor of Murdaugh, which I guess I find a bit strange.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:46 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Someone remind me what clothes Blanca said she laundered?
She said she saw a pair of jeans and a white shirt near the shower.
SLED inspected the house, looked in the showers and bedrooms, and saw nothing out of the ordinary (aka, no blood or bloody clothes).
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:48 am to SPEEDY
quote:
The two women jurors crying during his testimony isn’t really good news for the prosecution.
Probably not.
But that was prior to cross examination, and when his counsel was trying to drum up sympathy. I doubt that at that point, they tuned out the remainder of the testimony, including tuning out cross examination.
Juries, especially women, probably display quite a bit of different emotions, depending upon the testimony.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:50 am to Festus
I think the prosecutors are spending too much time on his financial crimes and not the Murders
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:52 am to KosmoCramer
quote:Some people binge watched the Murdaugh movies and are just now coming in interested. So I posted the videos for that purpose.
But we've known that since the video came out and was corroborated by 10+ witnesses, that's not a new bombshell.
I am unsure of a lot of things. Was it established AM threw Maggie's cell phone from his car while driving? I missed this part.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:54 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
I think the prosecutors are spending too much time on his financial crimes and not the Murders
I agree. If they don't move on from that fairly quickly this morning, I think they're making a mistake.
He's wanting to make a point that AM looked at people that he loved in the eyes, and completely betrayed them. So why not believe he could do that to his wife and kid. I think everyone in the world knows that he's a complete arrogant douche, and liar. Move on.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:57 am to Festus
quote:
quote:
I think the prosecutors are spending too much time on his financial crimes and not the Murders
quote:
I agree. If they don't move on from that fairly quickly this morning, I think they're making a mistake.
He's wanting to make a point that AM looked at people that he loved in the eyes, and completely betrayed them. So why not believe he could do that to his wife and kid. I think everyone in the world knows that he's a complete arrogant douche, and liar. Move on.
It feels like he's on trail for financial crimes.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:57 am to CU_Tigers4life
Agreed, the seems very personal to Waters. Time to move on.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 8:59 am to Festus
quote:
Which is why they obtained so much testimony from AM that he was a friend of SLED and they constantly were trying to cover for him and his family. It had been going on for generations.
AM has no relationship with SLED. His buddies are local police/sheriff's. It's honestly possible that AM has seen SLED misconstrue evidence in the past that was used to convict innocent people.
quote:
Again, why did he change shirts?
That's what he wore to work, do you often change out of work clothes at some point when you get home?
quote:
We can do this all day. I haven't seen the trial from day one, so I'm not familiar with everything and don't want to come across as I do. I'm repeating what every single legal expert was saying this morning.
I don't think it's unfair to ask why the state presented days of testimony about clothes it's assumed (again, they have no coherent narrative) were worn during the murders, and now suddenly are jumping back to different clothes. I could easily see that jump taking place in an investigation, but not for evidence that required substantial time during the case in chief. More of the state just throwing a bunch of facts against the wall and hoping the jury clings to something.
quote:
And I will just say, yesterday, you stated that the state presented "literally" no evidence that would give the jury any reason to convict.
I said they presented literally no direct evidence.
quote:
And you argued that it's a known positive strategy for defense attorneys to put their client on the stand
It is if the defendant can handle the cross.
quote:
as opposed to being more of a desperate move when the state has done a good job of proving their case.
This certainly does happen. Not what's happening here IMO.
quote:
When people pointed out most defense counsel try to keep their client off the stand to avoid damaging cross, you argued that was false and exactly opposite, even though most don't put their client on.
I argued that the defense trusts AM's ability to avoid pitfalls that prosecutors used to trap people, make them fly off the handle, seem unhinged, etc. That's yet to be the case with AM.
quote:
I just think you're a bit over the top in favor of Murdaugh, which I guess I find a bit strange.
I'm in favor of the state puting together a well though out and cohesive case to put someone away for life or even the death penalty beyond a reasonable doubt. I've yet to see anything close to that yet. I tend to look at it as if I were the one on trial and I didn't do it, I would want others to actually look at the evidence presented and determine guilt based on that evidence (as is the law).
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:01 am to CU_Tigers4life
I am watching it LIVE here
anybody got the link of those lawyers that comment while watching the trial?
anybody got the link of those lawyers that comment while watching the trial?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:02 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Was it established AM threw Maggie's cell phone from his car while driving? I missed this part.
Not in the slightest. The state spent a significant time trying to pinpoint when the last orientations on her phone changed assuming that was when the phone was thrown. That doesn't line up with the OnStar data about when AM left the house to go to Alemeda. That's my point about contradicting evidence that the state itself has presented.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 9:13 am
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:02 am to gravy553
I don't know how many more ways the prosecutor needs to establish he's a liar, crook, addict and general piece of crap. If the Jury hasn't come to that conclusion by now they never will. It's time to wrap this up.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:06 am to CU_Tigers4life
Waters is trying to get Murdaugh to talk about how he lies to people he cares about, and Murdaugh is just dodging it time after time.
I understand why Waters is trying to nail him down on this, but Murdaugh won't give him what he wants and it's just coming off as ineffective and weak the longer it goes on.
Waters better be planning to devote a ton of energy on nailing him down on his lies about where he was during the murders. That's really all that will sway the jury at this point, IMO.
ETA: And now the discussion about his drug use is giving him cover for a "brain fog" explanation about his lies to the cops.
I understand why Waters is trying to nail him down on this, but Murdaugh won't give him what he wants and it's just coming off as ineffective and weak the longer it goes on.
Waters better be planning to devote a ton of energy on nailing him down on his lies about where he was during the murders. That's really all that will sway the jury at this point, IMO.
ETA: And now the discussion about his drug use is giving him cover for a "brain fog" explanation about his lies to the cops.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 9:08 am
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:10 am to Bluefin
quote:
ETA: And now the discussion about his drug use is giving him cover for a "brain fog" explanation about his lies to the cops.
Can a person take 30 oxy pills a day and not die? Is that possible?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:16 am to Bluefin
quote:Exactly. The jury will be enamored of the details of prescription pills addiction.
ETA: And now the discussion about his drug use is giving him cover for a "brain fog" explanation about his lies to the cops.
Being on these same pills for surgeries in the past of the lowest dosage. I can say that even in this stage of the drugs you do and say some goofy assed things and don't have the cognitive skills that something is wrong that is.
It is why all should use these pills sparingly and get off of them ASAP. Not everyone has this will power...
Euphoria and brain fog. yaddah yaddah yaddah. But the jury will get all up in this in sympathy for an addict hearing details.
But did this crafty AM lawyer kill his wife and son? Or pay someone to-is where we are at...
AM will not confess. He is a sociopath I think with many alter egos.
NOTE: he is already calling them all by their nicknames.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:17 am to cajunangelle
This line of questioning is horrible
I still think the prosecution is in bed with defense
I still think the prosecution is in bed with defense
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:21 am to SPEEDY
Can someone update the nicknames?
PauPau is Paul
Mags-Maggie
He just literally switched to not calling them by their nicknames...
I think this guy has a few personalities.
PauPau is Paul
Mags-Maggie
He just literally switched to not calling them by their nicknames...
I think this guy has a few personalities.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:22 am to ILurkThereforeIAm
"Paw paw, Mags, Bus, Ro-Ro"
This dude.

This dude.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 9:26 am to Beef Tips
quote:RoRo is Roland, correct?
"Paw paw, Mags, Bus, Ro-Ro"
Popular
Back to top



1





