Started By
Message

re: Income limit for stimulus checks and rewarding the poor for shitting out more babies

Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44051 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:21 pm to
I honestly don't have a problem with the income limit. What I do have a problem with is if people already subsisting on taxpayer dollars, who are under zero threat to their government provided income, also get these checks.



Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

I love the sentiment in this thread that a family making over 100k per year are considered the "takers"


Two people making $50,000 each are two people who probably should have paid more attention in school.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
37064 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

I honestly don't have a problem with the income limit.



I do. Its a crock of shite. If you're gonna give it to "everyone" then give it to everyone. and quite frankly, $1000.00 isn't going to do much if this goes on for much longer.
So its basically a big waste of tax payer money
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
57906 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

What I do have a problem with is if people already subsisting on taxpayer dollars, who are under zero threat to their government provided income, also get these checks.

i agree with this.

people are going to get mad about this but there's no easy, perfect way to distribute a stimulus to 320 million people. there's no playbook for this and all things considered, i think trump is doing a pretty good job
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85128 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Two people making $50,000 each are two people who probably should have paid more attention in school.


2 civil engineers on the first job
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39157 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Latest proposal is that you will get a check if you made under $99K.

$75K-$99K just wouldn’t receive as much as those who made less then $75K.

Also talking about issuing $1200 instead of $1000.



That's more like it. 75K will get you a 3 BR house in Mississippi and it will get you a closet in the tenderloin district in San Fran.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
51920 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Right, but how does it make sense that a couple with a gross AGI of 149k gets a 2k check and a couple that makes 150.001k gets nothing?

Like I said, I think it's dumb. The government wants this done so quickly (by government standards) that they have no time to assess the impacted.

Also, 150k in Seattle is a hell of a lot less than it is in Pine Bluff.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35386 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Latest proposal is that you will get a check if you made under $99K.
Is this gross or AGI?

Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
213994 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:25 pm to
Then run for office if you could do better.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
19859 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:26 pm to
This is such a great representation of the OT.

People making $75k or $150k combined income are poor, leeches, and “shitting” out kids they can’t afford.
This post was edited on 3/19/20 at 2:26 pm
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
57906 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Two people making $50,000 each are two people who probably should have paid more attention in school.

ok sure

but that has nothing to do with what you quoted
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6694 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:26 pm to
frick yeah, going straight to the Kangaroo and getting some scratch offs.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
57906 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

People making $75k or $150k combined income are poor, leeches, and “shitting” out kids they can’t afford.

and i got blasted for saying adults should have some money saved for a rainy day

this board is hilarious
Posted by BayouCatFan
Member since Jul 2008
4580 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

they need a floor more than a ceiling. if you are on unemployment or SS then you shouldn't be getting a check.


Why is that? Anyone who is on unemployment, Social Security or disability buys good and services. This stimulus package is more about propping up the economy then individual Americans paying their bills. The best way to do that is to give everyone money to spend. Additionally, why should someone who has worked for years and paid taxes but has reached retirement, lost a job or been injured be penalized? We are all in this together.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
51920 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

in other income threads everyone says 100k is upper middle class

It's not that terribly far off for a married couple. Consider that 48.5k for a family of 4 is middle class.

Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
8426 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

My issue with this is that POTUS announced that ALL Americans will be getting money before he laid out the plan. If he goes back on his word, then people will be upset.


I’m not sure but I want to say there are 2 packages. 1 is a straight economic stimulus package planned before covid19, 1 is a covid19 package.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
57349 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:29 pm to
So now they get 10k tax returns and now throw in another 3k. Merica


I dont qualify it would be nice to get something since my wife maybe out of work at the end of the month if this Corona keeps going. Oh well I guess I am used to it.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28713 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Uncle Sam doesn’t know what we made in 2019 yet


He knows what i made. I filed my taxes already.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
35386 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Like I said, I think it's dumb. The government wants this done so quickly (by government standards) that they have no time to assess the impacted
IMO, it should be like our tax brackets, but in reverse. The more you make, the less you get, but not 100% or 0% based upon a dollar difference in income.

Also, think it's absurd that non-earners would get money that they haven't missed.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
213994 posts
Posted on 3/19/20 at 2:30 pm to
Yes. Both my wife and I are on disability. We should be part of this.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram