Started By
Message

In hindsight was it a mistake for the US to ally with the Soviet Union during WW2.

Posted on 2/25/23 at 1:59 pm
Posted by bdavids09
Member since Jun 2017
632 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 1:59 pm
With the Cold War and iron curtain and even today the us and Russia relations are really bad. should the us have just let Germany and Soviets fight each other or was it just more important to defeat Germany as fast as possible?
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22448 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:00 pm to
Yeah we should have just let the world end and not become a super power
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145180 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:01 pm to
Lol
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99093 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:03 pm to
We should totally have let Nazi Germany invade and occupy most of Europe. And exterminate even more people. Totes.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
33118 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:04 pm to
The mistake was not taking out Stalin after ww2
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31097 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:16 pm to
Should have let Patton take care of them in WW2.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71191 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:18 pm to
We were fighting Hitler. Literally Hitler.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:21 pm to
The OT is probably not the best place for a serious discussion of historical revisionism.
Posted by Tiger Attorney
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2007
19665 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:25 pm to
You act like that would have been easy. The Red Army was a force to be reckoned with and was willing to sustain unlimited casualties.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124349 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

We should totally have let Nazi Germany invade and occupy most of Europe. And exterminate even more people. Totes.



Yeah! Can you believe!?




Instead we let Soviet Russia invade and occupy most of Eastern Europe and exterminate even more people.




Totes.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98202 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:36 pm to
Germany controlled nearly all of Europe and had the USSR on the ropes. They were the bigger threat at the time. If Germany wins, we're locked into a cold war with a much more capable adversary. There's a good alternate history novel called Fatherland which explores this premise.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11815 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:39 pm to
Patton said we need to keep going through Berlin to Moscow….
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55496 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Patton said we need to keep going through Berlin to Moscow….



That and his opinion of the liberated Jews are what caused his assassination. He also didn't de-Nazify the local governments he was in charge of as much as some others would have liked.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124349 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Patton said we need to keep going through Berlin to Moscow…


Easy to say when it's not your sons on the frontlines of the slaughter.

We'd have needed more A-bombs to force Russia to submit.

More senseless slaughter
Posted by lowspark12
nashville, tn
Member since Aug 2009
22370 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:47 pm to
It’s just nonsensical… the US was supplying the red army through lend lease… we’re then gonna turn around and push on east fighting against our own equipment and munitions?… it’s silly.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65132 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:56 pm to
Hindsight is always 20/20.

While there were politicians who might have been half-serious when they expressed a desire to continue passed Berlin and on toward Moscow, there wasn't anyone within the Allied high command who ever entertained serious inclinations to do such a thing. By May 1945 the citizens of the United States and those of her allies were tired of war. There would have been no justifying to them an invasion of Soviet territory right after the surrender of Nazi Germany.
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11270 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 2:56 pm to
The take: the world would be a better place with Nazi Germany as a global super power
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98202 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 3:06 pm to
Yeah there was a near mutiny over plans to send troops from Europe directly to the Pacific. In those guys minds, and the minds of their families, they had done what they were asked to do and it was time to come home.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18425 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

The take: the world would be a better place with Nazi Germany as a global super power


Yeah things were going swimmingly there during the Nazi regime.
This post was edited on 2/25/23 at 3:08 pm
Posted by Kurt Eichenwald
Tentacle, USA
Member since Oct 2017
265 posts
Posted on 2/25/23 at 3:07 pm to
That Russia/Ukraine thread is doing a real number on people’s brains around here. Guess who did most of the heavy lifting to defeat the Nazis?

“Thanks for your help. Now die.”
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram