- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you had to choose, which one would you restore? '67 Mustang Coupe or Fastback?
Posted on 9/17/19 at 5:42 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 9/17/19 at 5:42 pm to finchmeister08
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/21/21 at 1:16 pm
0
Posted on 9/17/19 at 5:47 pm to finchmeister08
Fastback would get my balls.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 5:53 pm to HempHead
Ehh I much prefer the fastbacks on the 65 and 66
65-66:
67-68:
GOAT fast back of course is 69-70:
65-66:
67-68:
GOAT fast back of course is 69-70:
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:39 pm to finchmeister08
Fastback
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:42 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
Fastback
All day, every day.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:44 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:47 pm to finchmeister08
IIRC, the very first Mustangs were 64 1/2, coupe only. Then in 65 you had coupes and fastbacks.
I've been drinking though, so I could be wrong.
I've been drinking though, so I could be wrong.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:49 pm to N2cars
quote:
These guys are doing it right:
Those prices are comical.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:50 pm to Panny Crickets
"Right" costs money, but yeah, they're high.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 6:56 pm to finchmeister08
Fastback. The Steve McQueen version in Bullitt.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:01 pm to finchmeister08
Coupe will be less expensive to buy, and less expensive to restore, typically.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:07 pm to Napoleon
quote:
To be honest that 289 was not that quick.
Doesn’t take much to wake a 289 right up. A decent cam, headers, intake, and carb, and you can run with anything from that era, outrun most.
quote:
Also had front drum brakes, so when it was raining I would have to either stop fully then turn or drive into a curb in the turn back up and then go.
At this point it’s pretty obvious that all you were good for was turning the key, and pushing the gas pedal. Drum brakes aren’t great, but they aren’t anything like you’re describing.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:10 pm to KingOrange
quote:
The Steve McQueen version in Bullitt.
The Bullitt Mustang was a 1968 with a 390.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:14 pm to N2cars
This is the color of my neighbors.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:15 pm to troyt37
That 390 was slow.
The Charger was killing it so badly that McQueen was having to really over drive the Mustang.
The Charger was killing it so badly that McQueen was having to really over drive the Mustang.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:20 pm to N2cars
quote:
That 390 was slow.
The Charger was killing it so badly that McQueen was having to really over drive the Mustang.
You ever ride in an early Mustang with an FE? Pretty sure you haven’t. I have one, and I’ve seen many a 390 ruin a Chevy 396’s day.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:26 pm to finchmeister08
Fastback and I wouldn't put anything Eleanor
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:30 pm to troyt37
quote:
I’ve seen many a 390 ruin a Chevy 396’s day
I had a 1969 Mach 1 with a 390. The low end torque was incredible. I blew the doors off many GM muscle cars on the road in front of Acadiana High.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:30 pm to finchmeister08
Idk that’s tuff probably reg ... I had a 65 when I was 17
Posted on 9/17/19 at 7:32 pm to HempHead
Fastbacks are for rednecks
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News