Started By
Message

re: If you had to choose, which one would you restore? '67 Mustang Coupe or Fastback?

Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:17 pm to
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14688 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:17 pm to
If you say so. You hear a lot about stuff like that, but you don’t see many videos of it happening. I currently own a ‘67 Fairlane with a 390, and a C-6. I have surprised the hell out of several new cars that are supposed to be fast. I’m sure I built my 390 better than Ford ever built one, partly because some of the cam, piston, intake, and carburetor options simply didn’t exist, but still.

The times they want to use for these old cars just aren’t realistic for several reasons, the most obvious being tire technology. I guess each generation doesn’t really respect the ones who came before, but prepare to be embarrassed if you’re stepping to a big block car from the muscle car era, expecting the best they can do is 14’s in the quarter. I ran mid 12’s in my 390 Mustang, and high 12’s in my Fairlane.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40519 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:21 pm to
you've kinda informed alot. i was expecting those muscle cars to smoke anything. sounds like the drive like mini van.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31163 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

foot pedal wiper control,


They had those rubber bags for wiper fluid that rotted out quickly. In HS and college, I would use the foot pedal to convince people the car had rain-sensing wipers.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
59449 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:24 pm to
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35970 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:27 pm to
Is this the thread where we post gratuitous pics of our rides?

Posted by Dissident Aggressor
Member since Aug 2011
5813 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:31 pm to
Had a 69’ fastback with a 390 / 4 speed in it back in the day.
Man I miss that car...
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31163 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

I guess each generation doesn’t really respect the ones who came before


I grew up sweeping floors and learning to build engine in Gene Fulton's and Budd Moore's shops. Gene's house/shop was (and still is) next door to house I grew up in. I simply have no delusions about old muscle cars, I built them, drove and raced them for much of my life.

Further, I am talking about showroom stock vehicles. You rarely see an old muscle car restored to stock. There is no question in the modern world they have far more potential than they did then. I would love to run my E46 M3 track car against either your Mustang or Fairlane, it is faster with a smaller engine while being set up primarily to stop and turn. Cars are just more efficient (that C6, for example, eats a ton of power, a built C4 is a much better option) today, even a stock Mustang GT runs high 11s and traps at about 120. Don't get me wrong I still love muscle cars but stock today's cars are just significantly quicker.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14688 posts
Posted on 9/17/19 at 11:24 pm to
LINK

Sounds like showroom stock I would gap you pretty bad, with either.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram