- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I think people need to accept that the housing window has closed
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:17 pm to MC5601
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:17 pm to MC5601
quote:
$650k for about 3000 square foot.
You do realize homes are largely priced per square foot? 3000 LA is a lot of space.
quote:
what most would consider a middle of the road home
That's hardly a middle of the road home size in most places.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:18 pm to northgate5
quote:
I’m born and bred in Louisiana. For most of us there is no such thing as a large metro.
Sure, but a lot of the thread was about Nashville and DFW. I would personally consider NOLA somewhat similar.
If you knowingly move to a major metro for a job or just to enjoy living there, most knowingly plan on living in a shitty apt for awhile, usually with roomates, to afford it. This concept is not new.
When I graduated a lot of men moved for a job or back home, then found a job. A lot of women moved to a big city especially if they didn't come from one. Those women had no initial plans on buying a home. They wanted to start a career, meet men, and enjoy the city life. Home buying wasn't even on their radar.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:18 pm to baldona
quote:
I'd say that most DON'T in the DFW area and would prefer to live in an apt downtown.
Ignoring all your idiotic conjecture, the reason this is true is because that’s what they can afford
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:18 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
. Young folks should rent until they're really sure where they're going to be, long-term (or at least intermediate-term). Now, conventional wisdom of the elders does hurt here ("Renting is just throwing money away.") No. It isn't. It isn't a great long-term strategy, but renting works well for younger folks. No maintenance. No taxes. No transaction costs (other than deposits and moving expenses, which you would have a lot of even buying).
But, you're sharing walls with strangers. Lots of *ahem* "interesting" experiences in apartment complexes. It's how most folks should live through their 20s until they have a decent down payment saved up.
Literally no middle class white couple does this anymore, as far as I can see. They over leverage, 97% financed homes with their first real job and then they are truly stuck for decades. It will pay off in the end if they stick with it, but that is a big nut to absorb when interest rates are 6% or so on top of a 3% down, 30-year mortgage. On $350k that's over $400k in interest.
average of the first time home buyer is 40 now. What are you babbling about. Of course people are renting in their 20s.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:21 pm to CPA Yung Boi
quote:
Living within their means includes not owning a home until they’re like 40
BS they are paying rent to someone. They can find a decent house in a decent neighborhood and have the same note.
Or they can believe the mountain of BS that you and others post here daily citing "medians" as a way to prove their point.
It's a shame y'all don't recognize that all of this rhetoric is by design to get young voters to support the socialist/communist wing of the Democrat party.
If interest rates stay elevated the price of housing will eventually come down. It won't be overnight but the market will reset.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:21 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Young folks should rent until they're really sure where they're going to be, long-term (or at least intermediate-term). Now, conventional wisdom of the elders does hurt here ("Renting is just throwing money away.") No. It isn't. It isn't a great long-term strategy, but renting works well for younger folks. No maintenance. No taxes. No transaction costs (other than deposits and moving expenses, which you would have a lot of even buying).
This I agree with. But we aren’t talking about 25 year olds. We’re talking about 35 year olds that would like to settle down and have a family.
First time home buyers average damn near 40 years old.
quote:
Literally no middle class white couple does this anymore, as far as I can see. They over leverage, 97% financed homes with their first real job and then they are truly stuck for decades.
More and more people are renting and as I said, first time home buyer age continues to rise so your anecdote doesn’t reconcile to reality
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:22 pm to CPA Yung Boi
quote:
Damn you are dumb. Just because that’s what something would sell for now doesn’t mean that’s what the people that live there paid for it.
Right. Many if not mostly all of the pre-COVID owners couldn’t afford to buy their their houses today.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:25 pm to armytiger96
quote:
BS they are paying rent to someone. They can find a decent house in a decent neighborhood and have the same note.
They’ll just have to find $50k somewhere in order to do it
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:25 pm to CPA Yung Boi
quote:
Ignoring all your idiotic conjecture, the reason this is true is because that’s what they can afford
Um no, they choose to live there due to the location, price, and many other factors. This may shock you, but a lot of people that come from small towns actually look forward to moving to a big city when they are young to enjoy that big city life. Walking to a bar on a tuesday at 6 for happy hour, seeing friends, close to shopping, concerts, etc.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:25 pm to baldona
quote:
I would personally consider NOLA somewhat similar.
New Orleans, adjusted by income, is one of the worst places in America to be a buyer IMO.
Limited "safe" neighborhoods, shite public schools, high insurance, and relative to the job market high housing prices.
For instances
quote:
Houston and New Orleans offer distinct housing markets with different price points. Houston's median sale price per square foot is roughly \(\$179\), making it generally more affordable per square foot than New Orleans, where the citywide median is about \(\$222\) per square foot
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:26 pm to CPA Yung Boi
quote:
but the point is you thought you were making a point that you really weren’t
My point is that there are affordable houses in decent areas. They just aren't what people have conditioned themselves to want.
You agreed there are likely those houses but like me also admit there are few. I also agree that there are shitty houses and shitty areas that drive home prices down.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:28 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
New Orleans, adjusted by income, is one of the worst places in America to be a buyer IMO.
New Orleans income makes that metric worse than the actual market itself.
Insurance can be really high if you don't take steps to mitigate.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:28 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
My point is that there are affordable houses in decent areas
As a whole, there really aren’t though
quote:
You agreed there are likely those houses but like me also admit there are few.
There MAY be like 2 or 3 out of the couple of hundred you posted. There are almost 9 million people in DFW
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:28 pm to The Baker
quote:
Mine was 320k in 2024 Daycare is $1800 a month per child Student loans are another $1000 a month .... something something avacado toast and starbucks....
How about welcome to adulthood. You think you're the first to experience this? We've all been there . . .
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:29 pm to armytiger96
quote:
How about welcome to adulthood. You think you're the first to experience this? We've all been there . . .
If you are over 50, you have statistically in fact, not been there
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:35 pm to CPA Yung Boi
That's also sub 200k for someone making 140k.
And doesn't include the hundred of condos and townhouses.
And doesn't include the hundred of condos and townhouses.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:36 pm to Geauxld Finger
I’m older and doing well but do agree with the young folks.
1. Nobody builds smaller starter homes anymore. I’m sure that many people here grew up in a home smaller than 1,200 square feet. Nobody has build those homes for 30 years unless you include beach homes.
2. Half the homeowners in the country have a mortgage of 3.4% or less. Even if Charles Manson moves next door they ain’t going anywhere. Half of the alleged inventory is illusory.
3. Growing up there were many poor but safe neighborhoods. Our shameful immigration policies have ended that. Every realtor knows what the phrase “good schools” honestly means.
The Starbucks and avocado toast assholes suffer from a bad memory. In their day it was them buying 2 compact discs of music a week or VHS tapes.
Show the kids some love.
1. Nobody builds smaller starter homes anymore. I’m sure that many people here grew up in a home smaller than 1,200 square feet. Nobody has build those homes for 30 years unless you include beach homes.
2. Half the homeowners in the country have a mortgage of 3.4% or less. Even if Charles Manson moves next door they ain’t going anywhere. Half of the alleged inventory is illusory.
3. Growing up there were many poor but safe neighborhoods. Our shameful immigration policies have ended that. Every realtor knows what the phrase “good schools” honestly means.
The Starbucks and avocado toast assholes suffer from a bad memory. In their day it was them buying 2 compact discs of music a week or VHS tapes.
Show the kids some love.
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:36 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
And doesn't include the hundred of condos and townhouses.
Multi family housing: the American dream personified
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:37 pm to armytiger96
quote:
We've all been there . . .
Posted on 7/31/26 at 2:38 pm to SoDakHawk
quote:
Home values have to increase over time, the alternative would be much worse. Real estate ROI should be around 8% per year. That means every ten years the value should double. Your $28k to $98k in 25 years is about right. $98k over twenty years should be around $400k.
That is completely absurd and unsustainable. Housing prices should be increasing no more than the general rate of inflation, and treating single family homes as investments is why we are here.
Popular
Back to top


0



