- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Anonforthis
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 7 |
| Registered on: | 4/23/2026 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: This SPLC Thing is a Bigger Deal Than Most Realize
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/25/26 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
1. The DOJ believes that they are guilty of multiple crimes.
2. This freezes the $800 million war chest that the SPLC would have used to fund protests and democratic politicians.
It is one of those rare, happy moments in life when doing the right thing also benefits you.
2. This freezes the $800 million war chest that the SPLC would have used to fund protests and democratic politicians.
It is one of those rare, happy moments in life when doing the right thing also benefits you.
1
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/23/26 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
Since you seem intent upon calling me a bot, I will repost the link to the author. I was brought to his site from a posting on another forum. Your willful disbelief does not benefit your allegation.
LINK
LINK
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/23/26 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Not a bot. I am a long time listener, first time poster and submitted a link to the essay in an earlier post in this thread. I’m not making a judgement yay or nay, just posting this essay for thought. Might be a nothingburger, might not.
“ That’s sketchy enough, but the indictment really begins to grip when it describes the scores of fake bank accounts the SPLC created and used to launder money to its “informants” in the hate groups. It would go like this: the SPLC would dream up a preposterous-sounding business that didn’t actually exist. A few examples include: “Fox Photography,” the “Tech Writers Group,” the “Rare Books Warehouse,” and —I am not making this up— the “Center Investigative Agency (CIA).”
Those names! Rare Books Warehouse? Really? Was “Totally Legit Business, LLC” already taken? And … CIA? Are you kidding me? Did all the SPLC’s lawyers have a great laugh over that one? I bet they aren’t laughing now.
Anyway. Next, after brainstorming retarded names for their fake businesses, the SPLC would open a fake account at a bank, fund it, and use the money to pay “informants” and hate groups millions of dollars. We might call that a “left-wing laundromat.” The indictment calls it both “money laundering” and a “conspiracy to commit money laundering.”
Mind you, none of these businesses ever existed. No customers. No vendors. No products or services. To convince the banks to open accounts for their invisible businesses, the SPLC lied on the account applications. In writing. The DOJ now has it dead to rights.
Then —critically for the indictment— in 2021, one of the banks investigated SPLC’s accounts, discovered they were made up, closed them, and got the SPLC to agree in a letter confirming they were all fake and actually owned by the SPLC.
The DOJ has the letter.
The SPLC has lawyers. Lots of lawyers. Its lawyers, it turns out, did not bother to read the Bank Secrecy Act. The SPLC’s lawyers now need lawyers of their own.”
“ That’s sketchy enough, but the indictment really begins to grip when it describes the scores of fake bank accounts the SPLC created and used to launder money to its “informants” in the hate groups. It would go like this: the SPLC would dream up a preposterous-sounding business that didn’t actually exist. A few examples include: “Fox Photography,” the “Tech Writers Group,” the “Rare Books Warehouse,” and —I am not making this up— the “Center Investigative Agency (CIA).”
Those names! Rare Books Warehouse? Really? Was “Totally Legit Business, LLC” already taken? And … CIA? Are you kidding me? Did all the SPLC’s lawyers have a great laugh over that one? I bet they aren’t laughing now.
Anyway. Next, after brainstorming retarded names for their fake businesses, the SPLC would open a fake account at a bank, fund it, and use the money to pay “informants” and hate groups millions of dollars. We might call that a “left-wing laundromat.” The indictment calls it both “money laundering” and a “conspiracy to commit money laundering.”
Mind you, none of these businesses ever existed. No customers. No vendors. No products or services. To convince the banks to open accounts for their invisible businesses, the SPLC lied on the account applications. In writing. The DOJ now has it dead to rights.
Then —critically for the indictment— in 2021, one of the banks investigated SPLC’s accounts, discovered they were made up, closed them, and got the SPLC to agree in a letter confirming they were all fake and actually owned by the SPLC.
The DOJ has the letter.
The SPLC has lawyers. Lots of lawyers. Its lawyers, it turns out, did not bother to read the Bank Secrecy Act. The SPLC’s lawyers now need lawyers of their own.”
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/23/26 at 10:32 am to Anonforthis
“ But even setting aside the SPLC’s highly questionable intentions for the money it funneled into the very same hate groups it was fundraising over, and even dismissing the question of whether it defrauded its gullible donors or not, there still remains the 800-lb gorilla in the briefing room— the financial crimes.
Maybe the CIA can get away with using fake corporations to create bank accounts and launder money. For better or (probably) worse, the Central Intelligence Agency is allowed to do that for national security.
But I can’t do that. You can’t do it, either. Not without getting locked up in chokey.
And the Southern Poverty Law Center definitely can’t launder money through fake corporations and fraudulent bank accounts, not legally. Even though it made up a dumb fake company with the initials “CIA,” and probably wishes it were, the SPLC is not the CIA. Every single payment it made from a fake bank account is wire fraud. It might even be a conspiracy to commit crimes, like the Charlottesville murder, if an Alabama jury concludes the death was reasonably foreseeable.
All that to say: this indictment is very serious. If I had to bet Michelle’s Tahoe, I would bet the SPLC does not survive this case as an organization. It would probably be easier for progressives to just start over from scratch than to scrape the SPLC out of this jam.
But there’s 800 million reasons they will fight to save the SPLC.”
Maybe the CIA can get away with using fake corporations to create bank accounts and launder money. For better or (probably) worse, the Central Intelligence Agency is allowed to do that for national security.
But I can’t do that. You can’t do it, either. Not without getting locked up in chokey.
And the Southern Poverty Law Center definitely can’t launder money through fake corporations and fraudulent bank accounts, not legally. Even though it made up a dumb fake company with the initials “CIA,” and probably wishes it were, the SPLC is not the CIA. Every single payment it made from a fake bank account is wire fraud. It might even be a conspiracy to commit crimes, like the Charlottesville murder, if an Alabama jury concludes the death was reasonably foreseeable.
All that to say: this indictment is very serious. If I had to bet Michelle’s Tahoe, I would bet the SPLC does not survive this case as an organization. It would probably be easier for progressives to just start over from scratch than to scrape the SPLC out of this jam.
But there’s 800 million reasons they will fight to save the SPLC.”
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/23/26 at 10:31 am to SlowFlowPro
“Their intent is completely irrelevant and beside the point.
First of all, it’s 100% legal (though unsavory) for law enforcement agencies to fund criminal informants. Law enforcement trades cash for tips all the time. In theory, when it does happen, it includes records, receipts, is regulated by internal rules and policies, and is under LEO supervision.
But it is not legal for a private citizen or company to fund criminals. Not even as informants. You can’t cosplay as a cop and start making citizen’s arrests when somebody cuts you off in traffic. And you definitely can’t pay neo-nazis to organize violent rallies. Even if you mean well.
Second, their “good intent” is far from clear. One thing is conspicuously missing from the conversation over the SPLC’s “meant-well defense”: any evidence of prosecutions and convictions. If, over decades, the SPLC did use their informants to help shut down hate groups, then where is their track record, their belt of scalps? You would think the SPLC would have already posted that list on its website by now. You would think they’d be feeding allied reporters all the examples of all the bad guys they helped put behind bars using their informant network.
But … there’s nothing. No examples. No bad guys. No scalps. Under the law, when a reasonable person would speak in their own defense, but don’t— it can be inferred as an admission by acquiescence. It doesn’t look good. It looks like the SPLC’s hate-money never helped catch anybody.
So when you see someone claim without evidence that the SPLC was “only” infiltrating hate groups to turn the information over to the FBI or something, just ask: WHO??? Who was arrested? Who was prosecuted? Who was convicted by the SPLC’s heroic efforts?”
First of all, it’s 100% legal (though unsavory) for law enforcement agencies to fund criminal informants. Law enforcement trades cash for tips all the time. In theory, when it does happen, it includes records, receipts, is regulated by internal rules and policies, and is under LEO supervision.
But it is not legal for a private citizen or company to fund criminals. Not even as informants. You can’t cosplay as a cop and start making citizen’s arrests when somebody cuts you off in traffic. And you definitely can’t pay neo-nazis to organize violent rallies. Even if you mean well.
Second, their “good intent” is far from clear. One thing is conspicuously missing from the conversation over the SPLC’s “meant-well defense”: any evidence of prosecutions and convictions. If, over decades, the SPLC did use their informants to help shut down hate groups, then where is their track record, their belt of scalps? You would think the SPLC would have already posted that list on its website by now. You would think they’d be feeding allied reporters all the examples of all the bad guys they helped put behind bars using their informant network.
But … there’s nothing. No examples. No bad guys. No scalps. Under the law, when a reasonable person would speak in their own defense, but don’t— it can be inferred as an admission by acquiescence. It doesn’t look good. It looks like the SPLC’s hate-money never helped catch anybody.
So when you see someone claim without evidence that the SPLC was “only” infiltrating hate groups to turn the information over to the FBI or something, just ask: WHO??? Who was arrested? Who was prosecuted? Who was convicted by the SPLC’s heroic efforts?”
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/23/26 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
“And, in that lens, the fact of Todd Blanche —President Trump’s personal lawyer— replacing Pam Bondi looks a lot different. This doesn’t look like any unforced error, as the trad-media narrative suggests. It looks more like raising up a wartime consigliere on the eve of battle.
You’ll know our theory is on the right track if the DOJ soon also indicts ActBlue, and freezes its assets. What happens to the Democrats’ already-depleted midterm war chest then? With the SPLC sidelined and ActBlue on ice, it would be catastrophic. Depending on who else is involved, it could even be existential.
All the activity on social media over this indictment shows you just how politically thermonuclear it is. Not only is the SPLC institutionally at risk —the Democrat party’s political lawfare hub since 1971— but its $800 million is potentially in the wind as well. Even if DOJ ultimately loses the forfeiture counts, the money could remain tied up, off the table, till after the elections.”
You’ll know our theory is on the right track if the DOJ soon also indicts ActBlue, and freezes its assets. What happens to the Democrats’ already-depleted midterm war chest then? With the SPLC sidelined and ActBlue on ice, it would be catastrophic. Depending on who else is involved, it could even be existential.
All the activity on social media over this indictment shows you just how politically thermonuclear it is. Not only is the SPLC institutionally at risk —the Democrat party’s political lawfare hub since 1971— but its $800 million is potentially in the wind as well. Even if DOJ ultimately loses the forfeiture counts, the money could remain tied up, off the table, till after the elections.”
re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups
Posted by Anonforthis on 4/23/26 at 9:05 am to SantaFe
I’m unsure about arrests. This writer seems to think that the most important matter is the freezing of $800 million 6 months before the midterms.
LINK
LINK
Popular
52
