- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Anonforthis
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 30 |
| Registered on: | 4/23/2026 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: I think people need to accept that the housing window has closed
Posted by Anonforthis on 8/2/26 at 5:43 pm to armytiger96
A few comments.
1. Stretching to pay for a home is not the end of the world assuming that you are in the military or have some type of unionized government job. Layoffs, downsizing, and right sizing can hit at any time as anyone who has been paying attention for the last few decades can attest. With AI coming, a number of people with well paying jobs might become unemployed. The only thing worse than paying $500,000 for a starter home that needs work 40 minutes from your office is losing your job.
If you lose your house because you lost your job, greater than 50% chance your wife will be gone too.
2. The hard costs associated with the permits and studies and wetlands, etc.., that accompany a new house ensure that only an expensive one will have the profit that builders require. I have heard estimates of $40,000 for hard costs after the land is purchased but before the ground is broken for a foundation.
1. Stretching to pay for a home is not the end of the world assuming that you are in the military or have some type of unionized government job. Layoffs, downsizing, and right sizing can hit at any time as anyone who has been paying attention for the last few decades can attest. With AI coming, a number of people with well paying jobs might become unemployed. The only thing worse than paying $500,000 for a starter home that needs work 40 minutes from your office is losing your job.
If you lose your house because you lost your job, greater than 50% chance your wife will be gone too.
2. The hard costs associated with the permits and studies and wetlands, etc.., that accompany a new house ensure that only an expensive one will have the profit that builders require. I have heard estimates of $40,000 for hard costs after the land is purchased but before the ground is broken for a foundation.
re: I think people need to accept that the housing window has closed
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/31/26 at 4:00 pm to CPA Yung Boi
1. There are another 50 million people in America than 30 years ago, only half of them legal. That leaves a big mark on the housing market.
2. Homeowners are generally more law abiding and invested in the community than renters. We want a society of mainly homeowners.
2. Homeowners are generally more law abiding and invested in the community than renters. We want a society of mainly homeowners.
re: I think people need to accept that the housing window has closed
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/31/26 at 2:36 pm to Geauxld Finger
I’m older and doing well but do agree with the young folks.
1. Nobody builds smaller starter homes anymore. I’m sure that many people here grew up in a home smaller than 1,200 square feet. Nobody has build those homes for 30 years unless you include beach homes.
2. Half the homeowners in the country have a mortgage of 3.4% or less. Even if Charles Manson moves next door they ain’t going anywhere. Half of the alleged inventory is illusory.
3. Growing up there were many poor but safe neighborhoods. Our shameful immigration policies have ended that. Every realtor knows what the phrase “good schools” honestly means.
The Starbucks and avocado toast assholes suffer from a bad memory. In their day it was them buying 2 compact discs of music a week or VHS tapes.
Show the kids some love.
1. Nobody builds smaller starter homes anymore. I’m sure that many people here grew up in a home smaller than 1,200 square feet. Nobody has build those homes for 30 years unless you include beach homes.
2. Half the homeowners in the country have a mortgage of 3.4% or less. Even if Charles Manson moves next door they ain’t going anywhere. Half of the alleged inventory is illusory.
3. Growing up there were many poor but safe neighborhoods. Our shameful immigration policies have ended that. Every realtor knows what the phrase “good schools” honestly means.
The Starbucks and avocado toast assholes suffer from a bad memory. In their day it was them buying 2 compact discs of music a week or VHS tapes.
Show the kids some love.
re: Trump bringing back P.E. To schools.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/29/26 at 5:53 am to MondayMorningMarch
I’m unsure that this would work today. When I was in high school over 40 years ago, the female students essentially refused to change clothes and engage in PE class. Seems they wouldn’t have time at the end of class to do their hair and makeup again the way they liked.
re: What were some of Bill Clinton's weaknesses when running for reelection in 1996?
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/27/26 at 5:53 am to McChowder
The Republican Congress and Newt had Bill on a string. Bill didn’t have core beliefs concerning government, he just wanted to be liked.
Three retired politicians or cabinet officials have stated that Newt was pressing Bill hard to can social security and move to some kind of 401k program (details were not provided). In fact they had a final meeting in the Oval Office and agreed upon the structure of the system and how they would sell it to the people.
48 hours later the Drudge Report posted their story and the plan died on the vine.
Three retired politicians or cabinet officials have stated that Newt was pressing Bill hard to can social security and move to some kind of 401k program (details were not provided). In fact they had a final meeting in the Oval Office and agreed upon the structure of the system and how they would sell it to the people.
48 hours later the Drudge Report posted their story and the plan died on the vine.
Forget the official economic statistics. This is the definition of a rich man.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/20/26 at 7:35 am
Simple. A rich man is a man who makes $1,000 more in salary per year than his wife’s sister’s husband.
re: FBI Rolling Deep on Graham's Residence
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/13/26 at 3:57 pm to texas tortilla
Yeah Ladybugs surely has a lot of stuff around his house that the government wouldn’t want publicized.
You know. The usual reams of blank NDA forms for his male escorts, hard drives of gay porn, etc….
You know. The usual reams of blank NDA forms for his male escorts, hard drives of gay porn, etc….
re: Question about Jim Crow laws from a Yankee.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/11/26 at 12:58 pm to rltiger
I have read and believe that racism was different in the north vs the south.
In the south, whites didn’t want blacks to get too successful. In the north, whites didn’t care how successful blacks got as long as they didn’t live near them.
But this isn’t about denigrating any group or claiming that northerners were better than southerners. Just seeking the true catalyst for Jim Crow laws. I find it hard to believe that hordes of poor white farmers were storming the castle demanding new laws.
But again, I’m a Yankee so what do I know about the south 140 years ago?
In the south, whites didn’t want blacks to get too successful. In the north, whites didn’t care how successful blacks got as long as they didn’t live near them.
But this isn’t about denigrating any group or claiming that northerners were better than southerners. Just seeking the true catalyst for Jim Crow laws. I find it hard to believe that hordes of poor white farmers were storming the castle demanding new laws.
But again, I’m a Yankee so what do I know about the south 140 years ago?
re: Question about Jim Crow laws from a Yankee.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/11/26 at 12:54 pm to UptownJoeBrown
I have not written anything insulting about southerners or blacks. My intent was to seek opinions about whether Jim Crow laws were driven by poor whites (the majority of the population) 20 years after the end of the civil war or by a wealthy minority who feared a multiracial populist political block that was gaining power.
This isn’t a white vs black or Yankee vs southerner thing.
This isn’t a white vs black or Yankee vs southerner thing.
re: Question about Jim Crow laws from a Yankee.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/11/26 at 12:34 pm to Kafka
Thank you,
What is the consensus opinion among southerners concerning why Jim Crow laws were enacted and who was lobbying for them?
What is the consensus opinion among southerners concerning why Jim Crow laws were enacted and who was lobbying for them?
re: Question about Jim Crow laws from a Yankee.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/11/26 at 12:19 pm to OysterPoBoy
I would imagine that poor whites (the majority of the population) had more in common with poor blacks than rich white. The poor were all farmers. They lived next to each other, met with each other, ate with each other. Obviously the southern aristocracy could not abide with that so Jim Crow laws were enacted to divide and conquer.
Question about Jim Crow laws from a Yankee.
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/11/26 at 12:11 pm
I read an article that claimed that Jim Crow laws were introduced at the tail end of the 1800’s because poor whites and the newly freed slaves were becoming too friendly and forming a populist political block that frightened the economic elite. Is this true?
If white southerners hated free blacks one would expect Jim Crow laws to be enacted immediately after the civil war instead of 20 years later when William Jennings Bryan was gaining power.
What are the opinions of southerners on this topic?
If white southerners hated free blacks one would expect Jim Crow laws to be enacted immediately after the civil war instead of 20 years later when William Jennings Bryan was gaining power.
What are the opinions of southerners on this topic?
re: Update on Seth Rich
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/7/26 at 12:23 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Here is what I have read about the case and believe.
Seth was a Bernie supporter and very upset about the Democrats stealing the 2016 primary from him.
Seth has a brother and Seth either worked with him on the data theft (it was theft) or involved him after the fact. Wikileaks adjacent sources have stated that Seth originally contacted them and wanted to sell the data to them. They were in negotiations and Seth sent them part of the files to give them a taste. Wikileaks was then able to get the remainder of the files (not sure if Seth sent the whole thing by accident or Wikileaks hacked the hacker.
Anyhow, Seth was killed and some independent folks started looking into it and asking questions. The family made a public statement asking for privacy and respect in the time of grief and everything ground to a halt.
Here is the kicker. The family was approached by the government to make that statement. They agreed because otherwise Seth’s brother, their sole surviving son, would be charged as an accessory. Add in that the parents are democrats and revealing the truth would throw the election to Trump and their reticence was understandable.
So here we are. Seth did it and worked with his brother on the Wikileaks part of the crime. Seth was murdered by powerful people and the family clammed up to save their remaining son from 30 years in prison and half the country hating them forever.
Sounds plausible to me. Your thoughts?
Seth was a Bernie supporter and very upset about the Democrats stealing the 2016 primary from him.
Seth has a brother and Seth either worked with him on the data theft (it was theft) or involved him after the fact. Wikileaks adjacent sources have stated that Seth originally contacted them and wanted to sell the data to them. They were in negotiations and Seth sent them part of the files to give them a taste. Wikileaks was then able to get the remainder of the files (not sure if Seth sent the whole thing by accident or Wikileaks hacked the hacker.
Anyhow, Seth was killed and some independent folks started looking into it and asking questions. The family made a public statement asking for privacy and respect in the time of grief and everything ground to a halt.
Here is the kicker. The family was approached by the government to make that statement. They agreed because otherwise Seth’s brother, their sole surviving son, would be charged as an accessory. Add in that the parents are democrats and revealing the truth would throw the election to Trump and their reticence was understandable.
So here we are. Seth did it and worked with his brother on the Wikileaks part of the crime. Seth was murdered by powerful people and the family clammed up to save their remaining son from 30 years in prison and half the country hating them forever.
Sounds plausible to me. Your thoughts?
re: Off-shoot...what rights do men have that women don't in this country?
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/4/26 at 6:52 pm to Broadside Bob
I believe that medical care for women is more expensive than for men due to pregnancy, plumbing and other reasons. Yet women are not charged more.
re: Stephen A. rant Lakers ‘bunch of white dudes’ is unacceptable – racist much?
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/2/26 at 3:39 pm to CDawson
First things first.
I love sports but must admit something. These dime a dozen, undifferentiated sports talk shows are nothing but grown men who make a living gossiping about other grown men who make a livings bouncing a ball.
This tard in question came out a week ago against black culture during the Karmelo Anthony trial. Inevitability he got some blowback and is now over correcting the other way. Nothing more, nothing less.
Television, the news media, and politics are professional wrestling in a suit.
I love sports but must admit something. These dime a dozen, undifferentiated sports talk shows are nothing but grown men who make a living gossiping about other grown men who make a livings bouncing a ball.
This tard in question came out a week ago against black culture during the Karmelo Anthony trial. Inevitability he got some blowback and is now over correcting the other way. Nothing more, nothing less.
Television, the news media, and politics are professional wrestling in a suit.
re: Ca Dem Senator Wiener casually labels sex offenders as “minor crimes”
Posted by Anonforthis on 7/1/26 at 6:37 pm to LuckyTiger
I have seen a few guys with a body like his at 47 years old. Iggy Pop and numerous other drug addicts. Heroin? Meth? What do you think?
re: Sen. Lisa Rochester (DE, D) asked a simple question: "Where has socialism ever worked?"
Posted by Anonforthis on 6/26/26 at 11:41 am to Anonforthis
If I won $100 million in the lottery I would do the following within a matter of months.
1. Gift the local fire station a 90 inch tv so they can watch when they have some downtime on a long shift.
2. Gift the local police with a college scholarship for the children of any cop killed in the line of duty.
3. Gift the local senior citizen’s center 3 of those high dollar Japanese massage recliners so they can rest their tired bones.
4. Buy a new scoreboard and dugouts for the local baseball field.
You spend this $300,000 because you are a good person who realizes that your current position is due to dumb luck.
Or you do it because you are a scheming sociopath who just wants to make sure that no member of your family will ever be convicted of anything in town.
Either will suffice. Just do it.
1. Gift the local fire station a 90 inch tv so they can watch when they have some downtime on a long shift.
2. Gift the local police with a college scholarship for the children of any cop killed in the line of duty.
3. Gift the local senior citizen’s center 3 of those high dollar Japanese massage recliners so they can rest their tired bones.
4. Buy a new scoreboard and dugouts for the local baseball field.
You spend this $300,000 because you are a good person who realizes that your current position is due to dumb luck.
Or you do it because you are a scheming sociopath who just wants to make sure that no member of your family will ever be convicted of anything in town.
Either will suffice. Just do it.
re: Sen. Lisa Rochester (DE, D) asked a simple question: "Where has socialism ever worked?"
Posted by Anonforthis on 6/26/26 at 11:30 am to AUCom96
I agree with this post. I love capitalism but I don’t think much of our current crop of capitalists.
We had large wealth disparities a century ago but those at the top had the horse sense to give back to the poor. Rockefeller and Carnegie built universities and libraries. Rockefeller had a PR firm tell him to hand out shiny new dimes to kids on the street. These aspie tech tards today like Bezos spend their money putting Katy Perry and Gayle King into space. If American oligarchs (sorry, only foreigners are oligarchs. Americans are successful entrepreneurs) spent 5% of their wealth on children’s hospitals or funding a free college, they would be bulletproof.
I’m doing fine but I can understand why some of those who aren’t are upset.
We had large wealth disparities a century ago but those at the top had the horse sense to give back to the poor. Rockefeller and Carnegie built universities and libraries. Rockefeller had a PR firm tell him to hand out shiny new dimes to kids on the street. These aspie tech tards today like Bezos spend their money putting Katy Perry and Gayle King into space. If American oligarchs (sorry, only foreigners are oligarchs. Americans are successful entrepreneurs) spent 5% of their wealth on children’s hospitals or funding a free college, they would be bulletproof.
I’m doing fine but I can understand why some of those who aren’t are upset.
re: Mayweather faces felony charges for passing bad check
Posted by Anonforthis on 6/16/26 at 2:36 pm to gumbo2176
Floyd was used as a beard by a professional gambler to get his bets down. Not saying that he isn’t a moron with his other spending habits. Just that his gambling has been overstated.
The gambler made $50 to $60 million over 10 years solely by betting the over under on halftime scores for NBA games. Seems that two coaches always bucked the trend of choosing which side to shoot at for the first half. This means that two coaches were on the side where there team was on defense for the first half and could yell instructions to their players. This unnoticed was easily worth one or two baskets below expectations.
Yes, Floyd is stupid.
The gambler made $50 to $60 million over 10 years solely by betting the over under on halftime scores for NBA games. Seems that two coaches always bucked the trend of choosing which side to shoot at for the first half. This means that two coaches were on the side where there team was on defense for the first half and could yell instructions to their players. This unnoticed was easily worth one or two baskets below expectations.
Yes, Floyd is stupid.
re: Friend of mine married >35 years, and his wife leaves him for another man.
Posted by Anonforthis on 6/15/26 at 6:38 am to Dawgfanman
Could it be said that online dating apps are video games for women?
re: Japanese Reporter: Why didn't you tell us before you struck Iran?
Posted by Anonforthis on 5/31/26 at 10:51 am to stlslick
You would have a very hard time finding someone in any of a half dozen Asian countries who thinks that the Japanese got what they deserved.
They would universally say they got off easy. Only Americans believe that.
By the way. The death rate of American POWs in Germany was 3%. In Japan it was 33%.
Do you doubt that if the situation was reversed, the Japanese would have hesitated for a moment to drop atomic bombs in New York, Chicago or Los Angeles? :rotflmao:
They would universally say they got off easy. Only Americans believe that.
By the way. The death rate of American POWs in Germany was 3%. In Japan it was 33%.
Do you doubt that if the situation was reversed, the Japanese would have hesitated for a moment to drop atomic bombs in New York, Chicago or Los Angeles? :rotflmao:
Popular
1












