- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/28/18 at 1:39 pm to crazycubes
quote:
Why does player B have to show his hand if he doesn't want to?
Because player A put the same amount of money into the pot as player B. If it goes all the way to the showdown he has a right to see it. It's dumb to request this though when they are pushing you the pot.
This post was edited on 1/28/18 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 1/28/18 at 1:43 pm to PeteRose
Cards have to hit the muck most places
That's sweet vengeance for a super pretty move (asking to flip the hand). Once you release, it's over. Show some respect
That's sweet vengeance for a super pretty move (asking to flip the hand). Once you release, it's over. Show some respect
Posted on 1/28/18 at 1:44 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Player B folded.
No he didn't. Player B mucked his cards but the bet was called.
Either way player A should have been awarded the pot. Hopefully they got management involved and the dealer got run off.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 1:45 pm to Ham Solo
quote:
Any player who was dealt into that hand has a right to request seeing those hands because there was a bet and a call. This is a rule to avoid possible cheating. It is bad poker etiquette to make that request unless you actually suspect collusion.
As for who gets the pot it depends on if the dealer had touched the folded hand to the muck pile. If not cards speak and player B wins the pot. This is the danger of requesting to see a folded hand.
All
Of
This
Posted on 1/28/18 at 1:55 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
No he didn't. Player B mucked his cards but the bet was called.
Either way player A should have been awarded the pot. Hopefully they got management involved and the dealer got run off.
Once again, this is wrong. Once player B says call his cards are a loaded weapon until they reach the muck. Player A stopped them from reaching the muck by requesting to see them.
Action is binding. His action was call. It is entirely binding until those cards are lost in the muck.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:14 pm to LCA131
quote:
you're acting like a condescending prick.
It's not an act little girl
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:14 pm to TSLG
quote:
Player B gets the pot. The hand isn't killed if A asks to see the hand, but it would have been killed if any other player had asked.
It is why you never see a regular asking to see player B's hand in that situation
100% spot on.
This post was edited on 1/28/18 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:20 pm to foshizzle
quote:
then you're a dumbass for even wanting to see.
Why? Sometimes seeing how someone plays a hand is worth more than the actual pot
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:21 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
Player B mucked his hand. The hand is over. The dealer shouldn’t and can’t show a mucked hand. Player A wins, dealer gets fired.
This
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:25 pm to PeteRose
Cards talk.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:51 pm to PeteRose
Player A wins that pot. Dealer was correct. If you fold, you fold. No one else's fault.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 2:52 pm to AUstar
quote:
Player A wins that pot. Dealer was correct. If you fold, you fold. No one else's fault.
Nope.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 3:29 pm to dkreller
quote:
The dealer shouldn’t and can’t show a mucked hand. Player A wins, dealer gets fired.
Some casinos require you to show your hand at showdown. I believe most pro tournaments do it that way as well (to prevent chip dumping).
Posted on 1/28/18 at 3:30 pm to CoachChappy
quote:
The hand is over. The dealer shouldn’t and can’t show a mucked hand.
Player A wins, dealer gets fired.
This is objective and inarguable. Why is this thread longer than this response?
Posted on 1/28/18 at 3:36 pm to Breesus
quote:
This is objective and inarguable.
This is the OT, NOTHING is inarguable.
The majority here feel like B wins. Sorry, you're incorrect.
FWIW, I enjoyed your comments in the ADHD/Ritalin thread the other day.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 3:45 pm to LCA131
quote:
This is objective and inarguable. Why is this thread longer than this response?
Because there are rules Donny. Some here don't seem to understand them. Now mark it zero.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 4:22 pm to LCA131
quote:
FWIW, I enjoyed your comments in the ADHD/Ritalin thread the other day.
Look, I'm not that into dudes. But I appreciate the compliment. I'd probably let you do stuff to me, if you wanted, but don't plan on me reciprocating or anything.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 4:25 pm to shawnlsu
quote:no. That’s not how this works
Either way player A should have been awarded the pot. Hopefully they got management involved and the dealer got run off.
Posted on 1/28/18 at 4:26 pm to PeteRose
Player B is a fricking moron and shouldn’t be allowed to keep his money
Sorry bout your luck OP
Sorry bout your luck OP
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News