- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How real is a water scarcity threat, re: Building Data Centers?
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:38 am to Oates Mustache
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:38 am to Oates Mustache
quote:So if Republican politicians don’t care, then does that mean voters shouldn’t either?
but it's the Bernie/AOC push and i don't see much support in Washington from the republican side.
That’s backwards. Politicians should get their marching orders from the public, not the other way around.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:41 am to OweO
quote:
I asked ChatGPT if we will ever run out of drinking water.
Not if the globalist reduce the world population by half like they plan to do.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:41 am to OweO
I use it. It's just funny you don't see the irony in you asking ChatGPT to basically tell you if ChatGPT is going to damage the earths water supply.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:43 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
. Nobody is going to use raw river water for anything except, maybe, the cold side of single large centralized heat exchangers
Ding ding ding....
You'll be shocked to learn that the cooling system is complicated.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:44 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
*sigh*
From your own link:
quote:
Technologies already in production and ready for 2026 projects:
95–99% on-site water recycling using reverse osmosis + crystallization
Direct-to-chip and single-phase immersion cooling (reduces evaporative load 70–90%)
Co-location adjacent to municipal wastewater treatment plants (fast-growing trend in Ohio, Iowa, Virginia)
Atmospheric water generation systems now operating at scale in desert regions
Hence why most of the uproar about water usage is simply incorrect and based on outdated information.
Your article also details this.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:49 am to Supermoto Tiger
It removes the need for water intensive cooling systems, sure. The only way to reject heat in space is radiation, which is nowhere near as effective as conductive or convective cooling.
It's been a good long minute since I took heat transfer class but if I remember correctly, a vacuum is the ultimate insulator. Maybe being an ultra cold vacuum is enough to offset the loss of convective cooling, but I don't see in my tiny little mind how having the machinery in space would eliminate the need for liquid cooling.
It's been a good long minute since I took heat transfer class but if I remember correctly, a vacuum is the ultimate insulator. Maybe being an ultra cold vacuum is enough to offset the loss of convective cooling, but I don't see in my tiny little mind how having the machinery in space would eliminate the need for liquid cooling.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:50 am to Centinel
quote:
Hence why most of the uproar about water usage is simply incorrect and based on outdated information.
It is not incorrect. Hence why the uproar and the regulations and innovation to correct the water usage issue.
Without the uproar, none of the above happens.
And even then, I'm dubious of the regulations and self reporting. I've been on the regulatory side of corporations too long to know the work arounds for this.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 10:54 am
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:53 am to Oates Mustache
Elon is going to put them all in space, where they don’t need water to cool them:
If successful with this the problem eventually goes away, in the meantime there will be pain
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. If successful with this the problem eventually goes away, in the meantime there will be pain
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:53 am to Salmon
quote:
Without the uproar, none of the above happens.
It was happening regardless. On-die closed-loop cooling is far more efficient for GPUs which power most AI-focused datacenters now coming online or being planned, which is what groups are freaking out over.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:54 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:\
Elon is going to put them all in space
Sure, Jan
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 10:55 am
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:57 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Elon is going to put them all in space, where they don’t need water to cool them:
How are things cooled in space?
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:59 am to Centinel
You getting rich off these data center builds baw?
All of this is still happening right now.
Again, to act like water consumption of data centers is a non issue is disingenuous. We are debating the definition of rape. The use of aquifer water for cooling anything is rape, IMO. Exxon needs to fix their shite as well. This isn't isolated to data centers, but they are egregious offenders and thankfully are being reigned in on new builds. The old builds are still there and they are not all being refitted for alternative cooling methods.
quote:
Biggest Hyperscaler Water Users: 2024-2025 Rankings Latest disclosed or reliably estimated annual direct water consumption: Microsoft: 7.8 billion gallons (2024, +34% YoY) Google: 6.3–6.8 billion gallons Amazon Web Services: estimated 5.5–7 billion gallons Meta: 1.1 billion gallons Oracle Cloud: 600–900 million gallons and rising rapidly Notable facility extremes: Google Council Bluffs, Iowa: >1 billion gallons in a single year Google The Dalles, Oregon: historically consumed >25% of local municipal supply Microsoft Quincy, Washington air-cooled campuses: <50,000 gallons/year (versus new liquid-cooled campuses targeting <0.1 L/kWh using reclaimed water)
All of this is still happening right now.
Again, to act like water consumption of data centers is a non issue is disingenuous. We are debating the definition of rape. The use of aquifer water for cooling anything is rape, IMO. Exxon needs to fix their shite as well. This isn't isolated to data centers, but they are egregious offenders and thankfully are being reigned in on new builds. The old builds are still there and they are not all being refitted for alternative cooling methods.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:04 am to Oates Mustache
Nobody has been able to answer where all the water is coming from for the ones being built here in TX panhandle. One even has plans for nuke plant to supply power in addition to the 3 NG trains. Initial use is around 2M gals a day in desert. Amarillo was able to suck the local reservoir to dead pool on its own. Unless they can figure out a way to use the saltwater, it’s going to be a problem.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:06 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
You getting rich off these data center builds baw?
No. I in fact have a 960k square foot one coming online this year about five miles down the road from me, which prompted me to do research on the impact.
Not to mention professional interest based on what I do for a living.
Power consumption is a far larger issue than water consumption, which I stated in my initial post in this thread. Water consumption is nowhere near the issue it once was. For reasons that I and others in this thread have pointed out. It's being used as a scare tactic by groups opposed to data center construction, either for NIMBY reasons, or political reasons.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:08 am to Ghost of Colby
quote:
So if Republican politicians don’t care, then does that mean voters shouldn’t either?
I never said, nor did I insinuate that. It's why I posted the thread. In a lot of these types of partisan fights, there's massive misinformation or even disinformation on both sides.
I was trying to understand this issue from a water consumption angle, and curious why only the left side is pushing this, at least for now.
It seems that locally, where communities are impacted, you have a much more united pushback on this.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 11:09 am
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:09 am to SECretariat
quote:
Yup, industry makes the decision that maximizes shareholder value unless their is a reason not to... This can often result in "irrational" or "harmful" long term decisions in favor of short term savings. Local government and potential future liability can serve as the only checks on this process by ensuring that the long term needs are accounted for and weighed at the outset of a project.
And frankly a huge portion of local government has no material knowledge about this level of tech or environmental impact
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:13 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Raw water sucks as coolant.
Raw water would should be used under emergency conditions. A rubust clarifier system does a fairly good job. But when there’s an upset, the exchangers get fouled.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:19 am to man in the stadium
quote:
for Louisiana specifically, we have no recent studies or estimates on what our state water budget is, and thus, have no real way of knowing if data center proposals are going to overdraw a particular aquifer or not.
We should have something like a campus to study water. They would surely produce a water budget for us.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:19 am to Oates Mustache
AI is making people dumber, less capable, more angry, and less employed. Why would any normal, rational thinking person want these AI data centers being built fricking EVERYWHERE? These ugly arse eyesores serve no benefit to the people living near them. Quite the opposite.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:19 am to TigerGman
quote:
What more do you need other than realize it's all liberal B.S. than the fact Bernie Sanders opposes them?
Ah yes, socialism is when water clean.
You have to be pro dirty water to be a Republican these days.
Popular
Back to top



1








