Started By
Message

re: How real is a water scarcity threat, re: Building Data Centers?

Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:38 am to
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
15634 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:38 am to
quote:

but it's the Bernie/AOC push and i don't see much support in Washington from the republican side.
So if Republican politicians don’t care, then does that mean voters shouldn’t either?

That’s backwards. Politicians should get their marching orders from the public, not the other way around.
Posted by Kingpenm3
Xanadu
Member since Aug 2011
9915 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

I asked ChatGPT if we will ever run out of drinking water.


Not if the globalist reduce the world population by half like they plan to do.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
42256 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:41 am to
I use it. It's just funny you don't see the irony in you asking ChatGPT to basically tell you if ChatGPT is going to damage the earths water supply.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78341 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:43 am to
quote:

. Nobody is going to use raw river water for anything except, maybe, the cold side of single large centralized heat exchangers


Ding ding ding....

You'll be shocked to learn that the cooling system is complicated.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45911 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:44 am to
quote:

*sigh*


From your own link:

quote:

Technologies already in production and ready for 2026 projects:

95–99% on-site water recycling using reverse osmosis + crystallization
Direct-to-chip and single-phase immersion cooling (reduces evaporative load 70–90%)
Co-location adjacent to municipal wastewater treatment plants (fast-growing trend in Ohio, Iowa, Virginia)
Atmospheric water generation systems now operating at scale in desert regions


Hence why most of the uproar about water usage is simply incorrect and based on outdated information.

Your article also details this.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72061 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:49 am to
It removes the need for water intensive cooling systems, sure. The only way to reject heat in space is radiation, which is nowhere near as effective as conductive or convective cooling.

It's been a good long minute since I took heat transfer class but if I remember correctly, a vacuum is the ultimate insulator. Maybe being an ultra cold vacuum is enough to offset the loss of convective cooling, but I don't see in my tiny little mind how having the machinery in space would eliminate the need for liquid cooling.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86106 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Hence why most of the uproar about water usage is simply incorrect and based on outdated information.


It is not incorrect. Hence why the uproar and the regulations and innovation to correct the water usage issue.

Without the uproar, none of the above happens.

And even then, I'm dubious of the regulations and self reporting. I've been on the regulatory side of corporations too long to know the work arounds for this.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 10:54 am
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21867 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:53 am to
Elon is going to put them all in space, where they don’t need water to cool them:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



If successful with this the problem eventually goes away, in the meantime there will be pain
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45911 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Without the uproar, none of the above happens.


It was happening regardless. On-die closed-loop cooling is far more efficient for GPUs which power most AI-focused datacenters now coming online or being planned, which is what groups are freaking out over.

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86106 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Elon is going to put them all in space
\

Sure, Jan
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 10:55 am
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78341 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Elon is going to put them all in space, where they don’t need water to cool them:


How are things cooled in space?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72061 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 10:59 am to
You getting rich off these data center builds baw?

quote:

Biggest Hyperscaler Water Users: 2024-2025 Rankings Latest disclosed or reliably estimated annual direct water consumption: Microsoft: 7.8 billion gallons (2024, +34% YoY) Google: 6.3–6.8 billion gallons Amazon Web Services: estimated 5.5–7 billion gallons Meta: 1.1 billion gallons Oracle Cloud: 600–900 million gallons and rising rapidly Notable facility extremes: Google Council Bluffs, Iowa: >1 billion gallons in a single year Google The Dalles, Oregon: historically consumed >25% of local municipal supply Microsoft Quincy, Washington air-cooled campuses: <50,000 gallons/year (versus new liquid-cooled campuses targeting <0.1 L/kWh using reclaimed water)


All of this is still happening right now.

Again, to act like water consumption of data centers is a non issue is disingenuous. We are debating the definition of rape. The use of aquifer water for cooling anything is rape, IMO. Exxon needs to fix their shite as well. This isn't isolated to data centers, but they are egregious offenders and thankfully are being reigned in on new builds. The old builds are still there and they are not all being refitted for alternative cooling methods.
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13665 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:04 am to
Nobody has been able to answer where all the water is coming from for the ones being built here in TX panhandle. One even has plans for nuke plant to supply power in addition to the 3 NG trains. Initial use is around 2M gals a day in desert. Amarillo was able to suck the local reservoir to dead pool on its own. Unless they can figure out a way to use the saltwater, it’s going to be a problem.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45911 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:06 am to
quote:

You getting rich off these data center builds baw?


No. I in fact have a 960k square foot one coming online this year about five miles down the road from me, which prompted me to do research on the impact.

Not to mention professional interest based on what I do for a living.

Power consumption is a far larger issue than water consumption, which I stated in my initial post in this thread. Water consumption is nowhere near the issue it once was. For reasons that I and others in this thread have pointed out. It's being used as a scare tactic by groups opposed to data center construction, either for NIMBY reasons, or political reasons.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

So if Republican politicians don’t care, then does that mean voters shouldn’t either?


I never said, nor did I insinuate that. It's why I posted the thread. In a lot of these types of partisan fights, there's massive misinformation or even disinformation on both sides.

I was trying to understand this issue from a water consumption angle, and curious why only the left side is pushing this, at least for now.

It seems that locally, where communities are impacted, you have a much more united pushback on this.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 11:09 am
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12680 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Yup, industry makes the decision that maximizes shareholder value unless their is a reason not to... This can often result in "irrational" or "harmful" long term decisions in favor of short term savings. Local government and potential future liability can serve as the only checks on this process by ensuring that the long term needs are accounted for and weighed at the outset of a project.


And frankly a huge portion of local government has no material knowledge about this level of tech or environmental impact

Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13665 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Raw water sucks as coolant.


Raw water would should be used under emergency conditions. A rubust clarifier system does a fairly good job. But when there’s an upset, the exchangers get fouled.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8417 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

for Louisiana specifically, we have no recent studies or estimates on what our state water budget is, and thus, have no real way of knowing if data center proposals are going to overdraw a particular aquifer or not.


We should have something like a campus to study water. They would surely produce a water budget for us.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
56840 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:19 am to
AI is making people dumber, less capable, more angry, and less employed. Why would any normal, rational thinking person want these AI data centers being built fricking EVERYWHERE? These ugly arse eyesores serve no benefit to the people living near them. Quite the opposite.
Posted by Defenseiskey
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2010
2140 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

What more do you need other than realize it's all liberal B.S. than the fact Bernie Sanders opposes them?


Ah yes, socialism is when water clean.

You have to be pro dirty water to be a Republican these days.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram