- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:21 pm to CAD703X
I went in 1997 and don’t recall any lines anywhere
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:25 pm to CAD703X
Wouldn't join a line for such.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:25 pm to CAD703X
I wouldn’t stand in line to see it. I’ve seen it and while it is cool to have seen it, definitely not worth it unless you have some special connection with either the piece or DaVinci. But for the majority of people your time would be better spent exploring the rest of the Louvre collection. There is a lot there that is much more impressive or awe inspiring than La Jaconde.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:26 pm to CAD703X
I just walked around the line on the side. You still get a plenty good enough glimpse
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:33 pm to TigerTitleHunter
quote:
First time seeing it? Maybe like 15-20 minutes. After that? 1-2 minutes. It's underwhelming.
I was going to saw 1st time - 25-30 minutes max. After that I'm good.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:32 pm to CAD703X
quote:
Mona Lisa painting heading to the basement at the Alamo
The Alamo?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:37 pm to CAD703X
I wouldn't go to France so zero.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:35 pm to CAD703X
I'd pass it by if I was in that wing. It's pretty underwhelming relative to the hype.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:42 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
Yep. It’s not a very big painting, it’s covered in a protective case. And you aren’t getting close to it. It’s basically like: “Hey you were in the same room as the Mona Lisa!”
It's always entertaining to see these types of photos considering how "small" the Mona Lisa. On the opposite wall you have the wedding feast at Cana which is humongous but overlooked because of the Mona Lisa.

Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:48 pm to CAD703X
I have absolutely no interest in seeing the Mona Lisa in person. Is it different in person than all the pictures of it?
I don't care who painted it or what its a painting of or when it was painted that doesn't interest me at all..
I don't care who painted it or what its a painting of or when it was painted that doesn't interest me at all..
Posted on 4/26/24 at 3:13 pm to OweO
I dont care but Im gonna post about my disinterest cause it makes me seem so edgy and above it all 

Posted on 4/26/24 at 3:16 pm to carhartt
quote:
The painting itself is definitely underwhelming. With all the hype behind the painting, you’d expect it to be a huge painting. But nope, it’s barely a life size portrait. Now the Sistine Chapel is a different story. It’s not as big as you expect. But it’s amazing.
All of this
The Sistine chapel was the most incredible thing I’ve ever seen with my own eyes
Popular
Back to top
