
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How long till we get lockdowns for something other than COVID?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:43 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:43 am
The media seems to be trying to pump up some new disease in order to impose lockdowns for it every year now. Two or three years ago, it was monkeypox. Last year, it was bird flu. This year, it was hantavirus.
The media used to do this about once every five years, like with swine flu in 2009 or 2010 and Ebola in 2014 or 2015. But now they do it every year.
How long until they actually succeed with one of these disease panics and install more lockdowns?
The media used to do this about once every five years, like with swine flu in 2009 or 2010 and Ebola in 2014 or 2015. But now they do it every year.
How long until they actually succeed with one of these disease panics and install more lockdowns?
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 10:46 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:44 am to UFFan
I for one will fight against it happening again
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:45 am to Harry Caray
The MSM.
The MSM promoted COVID lockdowns because it left us with nothing to do except sit at home watching the MSM all day. Now, of course, they want more lockdowns.
The MSM promoted COVID lockdowns because it left us with nothing to do except sit at home watching the MSM all day. Now, of course, they want more lockdowns.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:46 am to UFFan
quote:
They seem to be trying to pump up some new disease in order to impose lockdowns for it every year now. Two or three years ago, it was monkeypox. Last year, it was bird flu. This year, it was hantavirus.
When were these lockdowns you speak of?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:48 am to thejuiceisloose
The MSM didn't actually end up succeeding, but that was their goal in pushing the monkey pox, bird flu, etc. panics.
They're going to push some disease panic every year until they actually succeed in getting a lockdown one of these years.
They're going to push some disease panic every year until they actually succeed in getting a lockdown one of these years.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:49 am to UFFan
quote:
The media seems to be trying to pump up some new disease in order to impose lockdowns for it every year now. Two or three years ago, it was monkeypox. Last year, it was bird flu. This year, it was hantavirus.
No they didn't.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:50 am to UFFan
quote:You know there are other things to do at home than watch fox news, right?
because it left us with nothing to do except sit at home watching the MSM all day.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:53 am to UFFan
If no one's health is at risk there will never be a lockdown (well I know.. never say never), but then again, it seems like the younger generations are being groomed to be a bunch of pussies and being aggressive is "toxic masculinity".. So there will be more people less likely to push back and unable to survive on their own because if their phone ever goes out, they might lose it (their mind, not the phone).
I would think everyone learned something from Covid, but I doubt it. My question is.. How different would Covid have been if it wasn't during an election year?
I would think everyone learned something from Covid, but I doubt it. My question is.. How different would Covid have been if it wasn't during an election year?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 10:54 am to OweO
quote:Our election year didn't impact (affect, for our semantics autists) all of the rest of the developed world having their own shutdowns.
How different would Covid have been if it wasn't during an election year?
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 11:16 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:01 am to UFFan
quote:
The media used to do this about once every five years
Nah, it's the same as always. You are just hyper sensitized to it and assume the worst every time they report ANY disease.
For instance, every step of the way for hantavirus every article ive read talked about how they don't expect this to spread, that it doesn't spread well from person to person at all.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:05 am to UFFan
quote:
How long till we get lockdowns for something other than COVID?
Did you lockdown for COVID?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:06 am to Harry Caray
quote:
didn't impact
You mean “affect”.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:07 am to UFFan
quote:
The MSM
I just sprayed a large section of Virginia buttonweed with some of this. Hopefully it wasn’t locked down and masked up bc I really need to get rid of it.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:07 am to UptownJoeBrown
Impact means affect, but nice try
quote:
Verb Usage
To affect or influence directly.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:09 am to Harry Caray
quote:
Impact means affect, but nice try
No shite. Why say “impact” like it’s some kind of corporate meeting?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:09 am to UFFan
quote:
They're going to push some disease panic every year until they actually succeed in getting a lockdown one of these years.
I had a theory that COVID was a rope-a-dope for vaccines.
It would get the conservatives to refuse ANY vaccine going forward and that’s when China will deploy a legit virus, killing off all the free-willed.
THEN they can have their way with the USA.
This post was edited on 9/15/26 at 11:10 am
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:10 am to UptownJoeBrown
Because I'm at work and in a corporate mindset
Why give a shite, especially when it's still correct?
Why give a shite, especially when it's still correct?
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:14 am to Harry Caray
quote:
Why give a shite, especially when it's still correct?
Because it’s a stupid buzzword that everybody says now when they don’t know whether to say “effect” or “affect”. So instead if risking making a mistake they say “impact” always. It’s a sign of low intelligence and trying to sound smart on a topic.
Not that long ago no one said “impact” with the frequency they do now.
Posted on 9/15/26 at 11:16 am to UptownJoeBrown
It's not that serious man
but I fixed it for you

Popular
Back to top

26












