- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How far will the TV industry go with screen sizes?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:08 pm to olemc999
Posted on 7/14/26 at 2:08 pm to olemc999
quote:
I can’t wait for projectors to have the same quality as a high end tv.
Unless or until there is a paradigm shift in projector technology, they will always be behind high-end emissive displays in certain areas. PJs do size really well; pretty much every other objective criterion lags behind high-end TVs. Now you can close the gap significantly by going out and buying a Christie or Barco projector, but you are going to end up with an HT that costs more than the median US house price.
The PJ market is small compared to TVs, which drives TV development at a much faster rate. Every year at CEDIA tons of new tech comes out for TVs; very little usually comes out for projectors.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 3:02 pm to Gorilla Ball
quote:
Why do you think Qled or mini led are that much cheaper than Oled screens??
Not sure if you are asking a question or using a rhetorical question to try to make a point.
The simple answer is OLED technology is more expensive to produce and it has a smaller economy of scale. It is very analogous to the differences between plasma and LED from the past. Plasma lit each individual pixel and was better at a lot of things and was more expensive due to the same economy of scale and complexity. Plasma died because it couldn't be miniaturized for 4K.
OLED is an easy button if you have the budget. It produces a great picture and does pretty much everything well except light output. In a room with high ambient light like most living rooms in the daytime a similarly priced QLED with a high population mini-LED backlight will beat it in overall quality because light output is so important there.
Keep in mind OLED and LED are not just a single types of displays. Both have been increasing quality and trying to make up the gaps to the other in the areas they lag.
If you are considering an OLED then you have OLED, QD-OLED, WOLED and Tandem OLED each has pros and cons.
With LED you have the backlight type (eg edge lit, local area dimming and mini-LED) and the panel type you have standard LED and QLED.
All these types have pros and cons and depend heavily on your budget.
I still stick with my general assessment if you do most of your watching in controlled light get the best OLED you can afford, if you do most of your watching in high ambient light then go with LED. This is solid advice for anyone that doesn't know what nits, REC 2020, and HDR10+ are off the top of their head.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 3:51 pm to High C
I have an 85” and wish I had the 100”
Watched ZS Justice League sunday and the imax formatting really reduced the overall picture even with the 85
Watched ZS Justice League sunday and the imax formatting really reduced the overall picture even with the 85
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:07 pm to Obtuse1
Thanks for clarifying
We just installed a 83” Samsung Oled from Costco for $2499 Gen 3 or 4 processor- I can’t remember.
It includes a 5 year warranty through Costco.
I found one similar on Amazon for $2200, a year old and older processor, didn’t include the extended warranty.
Thanks for your input
We just installed a 83” Samsung Oled from Costco for $2499 Gen 3 or 4 processor- I can’t remember.
It includes a 5 year warranty through Costco.
I found one similar on Amazon for $2200, a year old and older processor, didn’t include the extended warranty.
Thanks for your input
Posted on 7/14/26 at 5:20 pm to Obtuse1
quote:If by "certain areas" you're referencing ambient light, or BFTB, you're certainly right. If you are talking theater experience .... not a chance.
Unless or until there is a paradigm shift in projector technology, they will always be behind high-end emissive displays in certain areas.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:31 pm to Obtuse1
very informative. thanks.
definitely LED (mini-LED) for me then.
definitely LED (mini-LED) for me then.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 6:35 pm to High C
My tv is 60 something close to 70 but it’s cheap 1080p sort. I’m looking into those QLED types. Size i have is fine. But that nice picture I see at the store looks unreal
Posted on 7/15/26 at 12:27 am to NC_Tigah
If by "certain areas" you're referencing ambient light, or BFTB, you're certainly right. If you are talking theater experience .... not a chance.
Certain areas are every objective metric besides size. Some people have less eye fatigue, but I don't find that to be an issue for me.
There is an interesting effect with PJs in the area of immersion. Even when I sit at the proper distance from my PJ screen and TV to give the same viewing angle there is still an increase in subjective immersion from my PJ in my HT. Some of that is certainly other aspects of a purpose-built HT with a massive screen, but there is something magical about a large display even if none of the objective characteristics are as good as a high-quality panel.
In the end, when you can buy emissive displays in the 120 (wide) range, and the price settles into the upper middle range of high-quality PJs/screens (say $20k) PJ will begin to die at a rapid rate.
Certain areas are every objective metric besides size. Some people have less eye fatigue, but I don't find that to be an issue for me.
There is an interesting effect with PJs in the area of immersion. Even when I sit at the proper distance from my PJ screen and TV to give the same viewing angle there is still an increase in subjective immersion from my PJ in my HT. Some of that is certainly other aspects of a purpose-built HT with a massive screen, but there is something magical about a large display even if none of the objective characteristics are as good as a high-quality panel.
In the end, when you can buy emissive displays in the 120 (wide) range, and the price settles into the upper middle range of high-quality PJs/screens (say $20k) PJ will begin to die at a rapid rate.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 1:08 am to High C
I got a free 65" tv. So that is the right size tv.
Posted on 7/15/26 at 3:32 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
One of the first things I bought after getting married and moving into our first house was a 32” Sony. That thing was HEAVY and awkward as frick to lift.
That at the armoire it went in are relics.
Been there, we had a 32" with a nice oak armoire. The 32" stayed in that amoire 2 years after we bought our first flat screen because it was too damn heavy to carry to the street. It finally made it.
The amoire was too damn heavy also but did re-purpose. It's now in my garage and holds various car parts, small engine parts, repair manuals, etc... It was too nice to go to the street.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:52 pm to Klark Kent
The Samsung oled 83” was reduced by $500
To $1999
At Costco
To $1999
At Costco
Posted on 7/16/26 at 12:52 pm to High C
The Samsung oled 83” was reduced by $500
To $1999
At Costco
To $1999
At Costco
Posted on 7/16/26 at 1:55 pm to wm72
Console televisions were the best. There was nothing like lying in front of the tv with a pillow and blanket, watching Saturday morning cartoons.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 2:16 pm to High C
quote:
Now, I have a 55
I need glasses to watch a tv that small.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 2:28 pm to High C
Video walls and full immersion.
Posted on 7/16/26 at 3:10 pm to High C
They'll soon have a TV that takes up a whole house.
Popular
Back to top


1










