Started By
Message

re: How Can You Explain OJ’s Blood Found at the Crime Scene?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:30 pm to
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49497 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

How Can You Explain OJ’s Blood Found at the Crime Scene?


He did it.
Posted by jfootball14
Member since Nov 2013
1532 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:33 pm to
I remember hearing he didn’t take his rheumatoid arthritis meds and his hands swelled
Posted by Allyn McKeen
Key West, FL
Member since Jun 2012
4285 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

Why in Gods name the prosecution didnt then produce a brand new, exact match of the gloves, and have him try those on, boggles the mind


They did, but only after the first pair SNAFU. It was too late.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22387 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

For me, the DNA evidence was irrefutable.



Irrefutably planted.


quote:


OJ’s blood was found at the crime scene.


But not the night of the crime. OJ was compelled by the court to give a blood sample. That blood sample was then treated with a preservative called EDTA. OJ's blood was then handed over to Det. Phillip Vanatter who was supposed to deliver it straight to the crime lab but instead kept it in his possession overnight during which time he visited the crime scene. And what do you know? The very next morning they found OJ's blood all over the crime scene. And not only did that blood contain EDTA but the crime lab could not account for the quantity of blood that was drawn from OJ. The night they impounded the Bronco they didn't find any blood in the back seat. Three days later they find large quantities of the victims' blood.. The bloody sock had stains of near identical size and shape on either side. How likely is blood to actually land that way if there was an actual foot in the sock? That blood was clearly applied to an empty sock and soaked through. People want to remember the two assclowns Cochrane and Bailey but it was Barry Scheck who crushed the prosecution's case. But don't take any of that as me believing OJ was innocent. He murdered those people and the LAPD let him get away with it through a foul mix of incompetence and corruption.

Some people say that it might have been the son but I don't buy it mostly because the kind of monster who could do that to his own mother would almost certainly have more incidents down the line and to my knowledge he's never been in trouble.

ETA: Wrong son.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 8:34 pm
Posted by bott18240
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
563 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:43 pm to
One extra tidbit is the shoe marks left in blood were to a very distinct brand that was very hard to find. Low and behold who was wearing the shoes in a pregame nfl show, good ole OJ. They used that info in the civil case.
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15384 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Some of my colleagues are still torn on whether or not OJ is guilty.


Speaks volumes about your colleagues. Don’t ever forget that.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 7:53 pm
Posted by Z Cavaricci
Member since Jun 2020
1029 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:52 pm to
The jury consisted of 8 blacks, 2 Hispanics, 1 half-Caucasian, half Native American, and 1 Caucasian female.

OJ probably could’ve shot a few people on the way to the courthouse and this bunch would’ve still found him innocent
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22387 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

One extra tidbit is the shoe marks left in blood were to a very distinct brand that was very hard to find



That one's easy to explain. OJ murdered those people. But he got away with it because the LAPD planted evidence
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28226 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:56 pm to
Your colleagues aren't very bright.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17724 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:58 pm to
mostly an all black jury oh I dont know what really could have happened with all that data.
Posted by jorconalx
alexandria
Member since Aug 2011
8613 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Is that why it didn’t fit?



He also had arthritis, Cochran knew they were going to get him to try on the glove and told him to quit taking his medicine so his hands would swell
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Antarctica
Member since Aug 2018
9271 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Some people say that it might have been the son but I don't buy it mostly because the kind of monster who could do that to his own mother


Jason Simpson's mother is Marguerite Whitley, not Nicole Brown Simpson.
Posted by Coach Yo
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2004
392 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:04 pm to
I wish Ford still made the old Bronco
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10212 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:04 pm to
They put that on him.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22387 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:04 pm to
Ah, didn't remember that. He had a son by Nicole too, right? Son and daughter?
Posted by Sl0thstronautEsq
Antarctica
Member since Aug 2018
9271 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

He had a son by Nicole too, right? Son and daughter?


He had 3 children with Marguerite: Arnelle Simpson, Aaren Simpson, and Jason Simpson.

He had 2 children with Nicole: Sydney Brooke Simpson and Justin Ryan Simpson.

The "son" theory relates to Jason though.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 8:07 pm
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
29600 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:08 pm to
If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14784 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:09 pm to
The most irrefutable evidence to me is the bloody Bruno Magli shoeprints on the driver's side floorboard in OJ's crookedly-parked locked vehicle. Later tested, it had only Nicole & Ron's blood in the prints.

Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and/or cast suspicion on his son as the actual killer, where the frick was OJ when he was traipsing through human blood, before he started driving & parked crooked in a rush, as he admitted to police?
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
38933 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

The glove didn’t fit


The blood shrank it
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22387 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:27 pm to
quote:



Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and



This is not a conspiracy theory. It is proven fact. Phillip Vanatter planted OJ's blood that had been treated with ETDA at the crime scene. And the prosecutors didn't give a single shite. Again, I have never doubted that OJ was the killer but ignoring what actually happened in favor of this fairytale of "black tribalism" annoys me. The jury made a reasonable decision in light of the LAPD's actions.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram